TSMC's N2 process reportedly lands orders from Intel — Nova Lake is the likely application
It remains to be seen how much of Nova Lake is built in-house.

Intel has reportedly placed orders with TSMC for its bleeding-edge 2nm-class N2 process technology, according to Economic Daily News. This news comes shortly after AMD officially confirmed its Zen 6 'Venice' server chips, likely the CCDs, will be fabricated using the same node. If the report is accurate, these wafers are likely intended for Intel's Nova Lake lineup of CPUs. While this might put into question 18A's capabilities, Intel officially declared a dual-sourcing strategy for Nova Lake as early as last November.
Nova Lake serves as the successor to Arrow Lake, and is rumored to feature up to 52 hybrid cores (16P+32E+4LPE) segmented into two blocks of eight Coyote Cove P-cores, 16 Arctic Wolf E-cores, with four LPE cores likely in a separate SoC Tile. Rumor has it that Nova Lake will transition to a new LGA1954 socket, meaning existing 800-series motherboards won't be compatible.
We are seeing several architectural jumps here as the expected progression is Lion Cove (ARL/LNL), then Cougar Cove, and Coyote Cove for Performance (P) cores. Similarly, Arctic Wolf is suggested to follow Darkmont, which comes after Skymont (ARL/LNL) for Efficiency (E) cores. With 18A already in risk production, the shift to TSMC is probably driven by capacity needs, rather than performance or yield concerns.
Intel 18A should power some of Intel's most ambitious products in recent history: Clearwater Forest and Diamond Rapids (rumored), the former of which has been delayed to H1 2026 citing packaging concerns. To ease pressure on its 18A production line and prevent delays with consumer products, Intel, under interim CEO Michelle Holthaus, announced outsourcing some Nova Lake dies to partners like TSMC and Samsung.
As insinuated by leaker Kepler on X, high-end Nova Lake products will, allegedly, be built using N2 while 18A will be designated for the lower-end parts. This isn't Intel's first time partnering up with TSMC for CPU production, as the company's latest Arrow Lake CPUs (using N3B, N5P, and N6), Lunar Lake (using N3B and N6), and for GPUs Alchemist (using N6), and Battlemage(using N4) have all leveraged TSMC's process technology. This increases Intel's spending, requiring a careful balance between expediting product launches via external foundries or facing delays with its internal manufacturing.
To some extent, even Arrow Lake is dual-sourced with Arrow Lake-U (for low-power devices) using the Intel 3 process. While Arrow Lake had minimal in-house production, ex-CEO Pat Gelsinger reported that Intel will produce most of Nova Lake internally. Relying on TSMC isn't inherently bad if 18A can land a handful of external customers. Analysts have also suggested Nvidia might be eyeing Intel's nodes for its consumer GPUs in the future. Either way, Nova Lake is slated to be a 2026 product, so we're likely looking at the second half with how Intel launches usually proceed.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.
-
bit_user
Not really. What you're talking about is a Meteor Lake refresh, involving a port from Intel 4 to Intel 3. Other than the name, it has nothing more in common with the rest of the Arrow Lake lineup than Meteor Lake did.The article said:To some extent, even Arrow Lake is dual-sourced with Arrow Lake-U (for low-power devices) using the Intel 3 process. -
thestryker Dual sourcing with N2 seems like a really odd strategy in general unless it's enough better than 18A without BSPDN and the comparative cost makes sense. It also seems unlikely that high end products (at least non-mobile) would be made using a TSMC node given the mediocre high clock scaling their nodes have had (unless there's a problem here with 18A which would be bad for Intel). I'm also working on the assumption that Intel will not start making Xeons externally.Reply
I can certainly see a reasonable argument for Intel sourcing other parts of the CPU from TSMC since they have nothing that covers N7/N5 and derivatives. It just seems like Intel 3 and 18A should be able to reasonably cover the compute side of whatever is being made. -
DS426 I'm chalking this up as a risk management strategy. If 18A does continue to improve yields and ramp prod numbers, along with being sufficiently competitive with TSMC N2, they could go all-in for the successor to Nova Lake (I forget what that is). If it doesn't, they have TSMC to fall back on, or even "defaulting" to as they will with Nova Lake. Indeed production capacity is probably key as well, with 18A being prioritized for server chips and probably not expected to match the needed prod numbers for mid to high-end Intel desktop for this go-around.Reply -
usertests I smell disaster.Reply
Imagine if all we get on Intel 18A is cheap Wildcat Lake chips. I'll be dancing in the streets. -
bit_user
Keep in mind the timeframe, though. Nova Lake is due out in 2026. I assume mid or late in the year, but I could be wrong about that. The Nova Lake CPU tiles are pretty much the only ones it seems like would need/warrant N2. So, this is really confounding, especially if Panther Lake ships on time, using 18A, and has similar-size tiles to the CPU tiles in Nova Lake.DS426 said:I'm chalking this up as a risk management strategy. If 18A does continue to improve yields and ramp prod numbers, along with being sufficiently competitive with TSMC N2, they could go all-in for the successor to Nova Lake (I forget what that is).
Could we be seeing something like a repeat of Meteor Lake? So, like maybe Intel couldn't get clock frequencies high enough on 18A and that's why it's viable for Panther lake but not Nova Lake? However, instead of simply cancelling it, they're moving Nova Lake to TSMC N2?
Otherwise, I think it's very worrying news for their server CPUs.
I think layout is too expensive for them to do this simply as a hedge. I believe like a couple $B. I think they wouldn't undertake it, unless/until they're reasonably certain they can't use 18A, for whatever reason.DS426 said:If it doesn't, they have TSMC to fall back on, or even "defaulting" to as they will with Nova Lake. -
TerryLaze
It's a random off hand comment from a leaker on X that was made two moths ago.bit_user said:Keep in mind the timeframe, though. Nova Lake is due out in 2026. I assume mid or late in the year, but I could be wrong about that. The Nova Lake CPU tiles are pretty much the only ones it seems like would need/warrant N2. So, this is really confounding, especially if Panther Lake ships on time, using 18A, and has similar-size tiles to the CPU tiles in Nova Lake.
Could we be seeing something like a repeat of Meteor Lake? So, like maybe Intel couldn't get clock frequencies high enough on 18A and that's why it's viable for Panther lake but not Nova Lake? However, instead of simply cancelling it, they're moving Nova Lake to TSMC N2?
Otherwise, I think it's very worrying news for their server CPUs.
Take your salt pill and stop rubbing your hands together and twirling your mustache. -
jp7189 Simple explanation.. 18A doesn't scale frequency, so it'll be for mobile parts and low end desktop with 2N reserved for high-end desktop.Reply -
Mr Majestyk
Nova Lake successor is Razer Lake IIRC but it is supposed to use 14A, not 18A. Nova Lake will be barely able to paper launch in 2026, so if 18A isn't mature and of great yields by then, it would a huge indictment of Intel's foundry business. They will pay a fortune for TSMC's N2 which sees another ~30% price rise per wafer over N3. Apple is already mulling price rises for iPhone 18 due to using N2. They would be better using N2 for Clearwater Forest, where pricing isn't as crucial for desktop.DS426 said:I'm chalking this up as a risk management strategy. If 18A does continue to improve yields and ramp prod numbers, along with being sufficiently competitive with TSMC N2, they could go all-in for the successor to Nova Lake (I forget what that is). If it doesn't, they have TSMC to fall back on, or even "defaulting" to as they will with Nova Lake. Indeed production capacity is probably key as well, with 18A being prioritized for server chips and probably not expected to match the needed prod numbers for mid to high-end Intel desktop for this go-around. -
bit_user
I was agreeing with you, until this part. Five years ago, sure. But, today, Intel's server business is in trouble. AMD is beating them on data center revenue and they're having to slash prices, in order to stay relevant. But, it's not just AMD they have to worry about. There's also that other 3-letter company, starting with an A. https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/for-the-first-time-ever-amd-outsells-intel-in-the-datacenter-space https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intel-quietly-slashes-prices-of-xeon-6-cpus-by-up-to-usd5-340 https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/arm-aims-to-capture-50-percent-of-data-center-cpu-market-in-2025Mr Majestyk said:They would be better using N2 for Clearwater Forest, where pricing isn't as crucial for desktop.
I think servers and laptops are Intel's two most important markets. With the rise of mini PCs, which are based on laptop chips, the mainstream socketed desktop PC is less important than ever, and only ranks above dGPUs and workstations in importance to the company.