Intel’s entire turnaround plan hinges on this one new chip family – Clearwater Forest pictured, Intel’s first 18A chip slated for high-volume manufacturing
Clearwater Forest is key to Intel’s future.
Forget Lunar Lake; If there's one chip family that serves as the lynchpin for Intel’s entire turnaround plan, it's this – the company’s coming Clearwater Forest Xeon that it revealed for the first time at a recent event. The chip family is exceedingly important because this is the first high-volume chip to be fabbed on the Intel 18A process node, a node so critical that Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger has said he has bet the entire company on it.
Yes, Intel will make plenty of other processors with the 18A node, but mass-producing the Clearwater Forest chips on time is paramount to building confidence in Intel Foundry for potential customers, and that's the key to Gelsinger's entire turnaround plan. It also marks the culmination of Gelsinger’s audacious and now seemingly last-ditch effort to develop five nodes in four years to spark a resurgence at the ailing chipmaker.
Intel displayed the Clearwater Forest chip for the first time at its Enterprise Tech Tour event in Portland, Oregon, last week, but it won't come to market until sometime next year. Intel also unveiled its latest Xeon 6 Granite Rapids data center chips at the event, and they do look promising — Intel has now matched the number of cores in AMD’s competing data center processors for the first time since EPYC launched in 2017.
However, while Xeon 6 comes with Intel’s competitive ‘Intel 3’ node, the underlying process node still lags behind the 3nm TSMC transistors that will power AMD’s EPYC Turin processors that launch next month.
Intel plans for its 18A process to overtake TSMC's tech in several key criteria, thus propelling the company to a historic comeback – and that’s where Clearwater Forest comes in. As the first chip fabbed on 18A in high volumes, it is critical not only for Intel’s products but also for its Intel Foundry subsidiary to become a contract chipmaker for other companies, much like its rival TSMC. Gelsinger’s plan ultimately hinges on making chips for other companies to sustain the cash flow it needs to continue developing leading-edge chip technology.
Earlier this month, Intel canceled its interim 20A process, a pipe cleaner node that provided a development platform for the disruptive tech that powers the 18A node. That means the onus is now even more so on 18A to save the company than when Gelsinger conceded, “I’ve bet the whole company on 18A,” in an interview with TechTechPotato six months ago.
In fact, things have only gotten worse for the company since that interview. Intel has now dropped to a mere $96 billion market cap while companies it routinely thrashed in the past have risen to new heights, like AMD, which now sports a $250 billion market cap, and Nvidia, which hovers just shy of a stunning $3 trillion cap. Amazingly, even memory vendors like SK hynix and Samsung are apparently poised to generate more revenue in the third quarter than Intel, a once unthinkable feat as the memory vendors capitalize on the AI boom.
Intel continues to axe programs – so many that I’ve lost count – and has recently begun to lay off more than 15% of its workforce, or 15,000 workers. It even issued yet another emergency restructuring plan last week that includes pausing several fab projects.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
The situation has apparently become so dire that what was completely inconceivable a few short years ago, Qualcomm reportedly making overtures to take over Intel, now dominates the headlines.
Looking back over history finds Intel missing out on several revolutions, like rejecting the chance to make smartphone chips for Apple, killing its nascent Larabee GPU project that could have placed it in the driver’s seat for the AI revolution, and even reportedly passing on the chance to own a piece of OpenAI before the current AI hype cycle took hold, among others.
But while those missed opportunities were painful, they obviously weren’t fatal blows. Perhaps none of the company’s missteps have brought it to its knees like its then-uncharacteristic delays to its 10nm node. That shortcoming weakened the company as AMD barreled in with suddenly class-leading TSMC nodes powering its chips in both the consumer and enterprise markets, slowly eating away at Intel’s market share and, perhaps more importantly, taking massive chomps out of Intel’s margins.
Intel’s stagnation has even helped breathe new life into Arm, which is arguably now becoming even more of a threat than AMD in the data center and consumer market. Meanwhile, TSMC has risen to be the predominant leading-edge chipmaker for the entire world, leaving the US in the tenuous position of not having a domestic supply chain capable of taking over if the long-simmering China and Taiwan tensions boil over into a war.
Because 18A is Intel Foundry’s premiere node, now the entire plan hinges on the transistors found in the Clearwater Forest chips that the company revealed at the event for the first time. If Intel can produce those chips economically, they will be the key to its turnaround, particularly because it will entice other companies to have their own chips made at Intel Foundry. If Intel can’t punch these chips out in high volume or is beset by delays, we could be looking at a future that doesn’t include an Intel that resembles its current form.
As unbelievable as it sounds, it really has come down to this. For now, all signs point to Intel’s 18A being a healthy, production-class node. That's a good sign, as the market needs competition to keep prices in check, not to mention that, for the sake of national security, the US needs a domestic chipmaker punching out leading-edge nodes.
Paul Alcorn is the Managing Editor: News and Emerging Tech for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.
-
dalek1234
That's my bet, too. The only question is how exactly will Intel implode in a few years? I mean, someone is going to buy Intel once its dirt cheap, for their x86 license, but who will be the new x86 owner?vanadiel007 said:I don't think any of this is going to matter. -
passivecool Every empire falls eventually.Reply
I'm a long disappointed Intel fan, but I hope they corner-pocket this, truly. -
Gururu Aside from TSMC 1.6nm in 2026, who is going to manufacture the 18A (1.8nm) chips? Is this limited to the spin-off foundry? If production lands on solid ground, this will bode well for U.S. tech.Reply -
Eximo Supply and Demand at the moment. Doesn't matter if other silicon is more power efficient, cheaper, or generally better. There just isn't enough out there for all these SaaS, Cloud, and AI infrastructure being built. If Intel can launch viable products, people will buy them if they can get them at volume on time.Reply
I don't think Intel Design or Intel Foundries will go under. IFS may split off, but that still leaves Intel with some nodes for making mobile/desktop chips, network, etc. People always concentrate on compute, but they make a lot of stuff compared to AMD. Nvidia has branched out quite a bit in recent times on that front. AMD not so much.
TSMCs older nodes are also beneficial and could be a really good stop gap for Intel, AMD, and Nvidia. Remember when all GPUs were stuck on TSMC 40nm and 28nm for several generations? We could see more of that coming as AI takes over the next gen fabs relegating consumer hardware to optimized versions of what we have now. -
ottonis Didn't Broadcom recently complain about how disappointing they found first test drive productions of their chips on Intel's 18A process?Reply -
redgarl Good old Intel trying to GASLIGHT everyone with desperation within PowerPoint presentations.Reply
Intel is at a moment that they cannot justify their operating margins. They need the necessary revenue to justify their work force, but they can't. Their monopoly days are over and they are not agile due to the shear size of the company.
To add to the irony, they are challenging TSMC which is probably the dumbest move from them I have seen since their 5G modem endeavor against QCOM.
The company valuation is making them vulnerable for a takeover and I don't foresee anyone being able to avoid the giant from collapsing in the end. This will be a painful and slow fall. -
bit_user OMG, that headline image looks so janky. I know the dies must be precisely positioned, but the ones at either end that are shifted alternately up and down from the ones next to them + the discoloration elsewhere make it look like a mockup, rather than an actual engineering sample.Reply -
bit_user
Intel 4 is also virtually non-existent. It's only used for the CPU tiles on Meteor Lake and isn't very profitable due to poor yields.joeer77 said:5 nodes in 5 years doesn't count if you outsource one node (20A) to TSMC.