Intel Kills Optane Memory Business, Pays $559 Million Inventory Write-Off

Intel
(Image credit: Lenovo)
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • USAFRet
    Good.
    Reply
  • cirdecus
    This is a shame. Optane runs client apps and games far better than anything today and at extreme reliability. I'm using the 1.5TB drive for steam games and windows apps and i love it. That being said, I know they're looking to focus on their chip business and as NAND improves, the cost for the technology just can't keep up. Great innovation though.
    Reply
  • maestro0428
    Damn right its a shame. Optane drives are the fastest on the planet and will be for some time. They also last for ever (tons of writes) and noone can match it. I have four in my workstation and love em. Mine (900p) arent the fastest at sequential reads and writes but still dominate benches in everyplace that actually matters.
    Reply
  • jeremyj_83
    maestro0428 said:
    Damn right its a shame. Optane drives are the fastest on the planet and will be for some time. They also last for ever (tons of writes) and noone can match it. I have four in my workstation and love em. Mine (900p) arent the fastest at sequential reads and writes but still dominate benches in everyplace that actually matters.
    This was Optane memory and not Optane SSD.
    Reply
  • LikeClockwork64
    Some poor IT guy is going to get fired because its going to take a day instead of an hour to troubleshoot someone's business
    Reply
  • we_are_theBorg
    Shouldn't that subtitle be:

    "3D XPoint at the last Xroad."🤔

    But seriously, it's a shame. I only ever used it seriously in one system but it was incredibly useful when you really needed that memory density, or an intermediate caching layer with extremely durable writes. It's failure kinda psychologically entrenches NAND just that much deeper and disincentivises future productization of any competing or creative high performance storage technologies.

    XPoint, you will be missed (a little bit, by a handful of hardcore nerds) 🥀
    Reply
  • escksu
    Oh, been a long time. Optane is not bad but its simply way too expensive. It ended up as a product which is neither here nor there.

    Unlike Optane, NAND is making leaps and bounds in terms of progress. This is mainly due to a very competitive market and massive demand for NAND.
    Reply
  • 2Be_or_Not2Be
    jeremyj_83 said:
    This was Optane memory and not Optane SSD.

    I feel the irony in how Intel wants now to get back more local manufacturing/fabrication, but they let a local one of their own creation go previously. It's still a shame to me that they left Optane storage first, which was its best performer - more so than Optane memory. Optane was great for virtual hosts & database servers in the enterprise, but they couldn't bring the price down to make it become profitable to everyone. Between them and Micron, they would have had the highest performing standard for storage, not only for servers, but even for client PCs. Also, they would have dominated it as being the sole providers of the storage at first, before they started licensing it out more. Intel was making billions; they should have kept it longer, even while they were losing on it. The long-term potential for the future could have made that the loss back. Instead, NAND still dominates, and we're faced with lower stuff like QLC & PLC. Ugh...

    Oh well... such is life.
    Reply
  • Kamen Rider Blade
    Intel making bone head moves again.

    They should license the Optane technology to ALL the competing memory manufacturers and let them innovate on it.

    Just like Intel contributing ThunderBolt Interface to USB IF.

    Intel trying to make this "Proprietary", kills off very good technology by being too expensive to sustain or innovate on.

    Damn, such good technology going down the drain because of mismanagement for the top getting too greedy.
    Reply
  • slash3
    jeremyj_83 said:
    This was Optane memory and not Optane SSD.

    Ryan Smith over at AnandTech has since confirmed with Intel that it is in fact Optane in its entirety that is being discontinued.

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/17515/intel-to-wind-down-optane-memory-business
    "Update: 6:40pm ET
    Following our request, Intel has sent out a short statement on the Optane wind-down. While not offering much in the way of further details on Intel's exit, it does confirm that Intel is indeed exiting the entire Optane business.

    We continue to rationalize our portfolio in support of our IDM 2.0 strategy. This includes evaluating divesting businesses that are either not sufficiently profitable or not core to our strategic objectives. After careful consideration, Intel plans to cease future product development within its Optane business. We are committed to supporting Optane customers through the transition."
    Reply