Intel Announces Cascade Lake-X With up to 50% Price Cut, More PCIe (Updated)

Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • mdd1963
    I'd be more than a little irked if I'd just paid $1900+ for a 9980XE anytime within the last several months....; that is an even worse case of 'buy at the wrong time-syndrome' than when the 6950X ($1799+) was replaced by the 7900X ($999) 18-20 months ago...
    Reply
  • kinggremlin
    mdd1963 said:
    I'd be more than a little irked if I'd just paid $1900+ for a 9980XE anytime within the last several months....; that is an even worse case of 'buy at the wrong time-syndrome' than when the 6950X ($1799+) was replaced by the 7900X ($999) 18-20 months ago...
    Oh well. The tech industry has been like this since its beginning. Just another example of unnecessarily dwelling on the negative. Complain when prices are too high. Then complain when prices that were too high are dropped.
    Reply
  • GetSmart
    These new Intel CPUs can only compete with AMD's mainstream Ryzen desktop CPUs, and certainly not against AMD's current Threadripper HEDT CPUs because still lagged behind in term of maximum core counts and the number of PCI Express lanes. To challenge AMD's current Threadripper HEDT CPUs, at least those Intel workstation class Xeons. Additionally that Intel Core i9-10900X could make the current Intel Core i9-9900K's position kinda precarious. Update: Anandtech's article also mentions similar scenario about Intel Core i9-10900X and Intel Core i9-9900K.
    Reply
  • redgarl
    Intel earnings are going to suffer, Investors should be spooked.
    Reply
  • GetSmart
    Years ago, Intel's HEDT is a niche segment. How many can afford any Intel CPUs with 8 cores and above? Nowadays high core count CPUs are no longer a niche anymore. Times have changed.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    GetSmart said:
    These new Intel CPUs can only compete with AMD's mainstream Ryzen desktop CPUs, and certainly not against AMD's current Threadripper HEDT CPUs because still lagged behind in term of maximum core counts and the number of PCI Express lanes.
    In terms of core count per dollar or dollars per core, the new Intel CPUs are perfectly fine compared to current prices on TR2 CPUs. The PCIe lane count argument may have been a big thing back when Intel's HEDT started at only 28 PCIe lanes but at 48 lanes, I doubt it is even a remote concern to most potential buyers.
    Reply
  • Murissokah
    Kudos to AMD for bringing back competition. The last decade has been disappointing in terms of CPU innovation.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    Murissokah said:
    Kudos to AMD for bringing back competition. The last decade has been disappointing in terms of CPU innovation.
    Don't celebrate too soon, prices are still trending up for a given relative performance tier in the mainstream instead of trending down (rather sharply at that) as they used to back when we had price wars between AMD and Intel every year until ~12 years ago.

    I'm not going to declare victory for consumers until I see AMD and Intel trying to one-up each other for domination at every price point instead of releasing the bare minimum they can get away with for a given product cycle.

    I'm glad that AMD finally put a check on Intel's greed, not so pleased with AMD getting greedier while Intel is at a disadvantage.
    Reply
  • FurryVengence
    All I do on my rig is play games, those CPU prices are STILL way to rich for my blood. I'll save that money and use on a better GPU
    Reply
  • MasterE
    I noticed that the AMD Threadripper 2950X was conspicuously missing from the comparison table... I guess because for an article talking up the Intel processor lines coming, no one wanted too many AMD processors pushing out the intended Intel "supremacy" announcements.

    Says the man running an Intel Core i7 4790K but secretly wanting a TR 2990WX
    Reply