Intel Opens Chinese Chip Innovation Center for Developing AI, Custom Chips

Intel
(Image credit: Intel)
3

Intel has launched a new innovation center in Shenzhen, China. The center will work on artificial intelligence (AI), chips, and edge computing applications for the local market. As reported by The Register. Essentially, Intel wants to develop products for China in the People's Republic. Meanwhile, the decision by the U.S. company somewhat contradicts the harsh U.S. stance against Chinese high-tech industries.

The innovation center would utilize "Intel's existing technologies and products to continuously enable the application innovations of our partners and customers with an open ecosystem, with a focus on applications in artificial intelligence (AI), chip applications and edge computing etc to address the local market demand," a statement from Intel published by The Register reads.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • bit_user
    Let's hope it works out better than ARM's Chinese subsidiary did.
    Reply
  • NinoPino
    But what will be the opinion of the US government after all the anti-Chinese efforts ?
    Reply
  • bit_user
    NinoPino said:
    But what will be the opinion of the US government after all the anti-Chinese efforts ?
    Or, you could ask whether China will allow the use of the IP generated at that lab in products for the US market. Since the lab is setup as a partnership, it's probably either a subsidiary or maybe Intel doesn't even have exclusive ownership, given how it was described as a "collaborative effort between Intel, Nanshan district government in Shenzhen, and local technology firms".

    However it's setup, I'm sure the Chinese government would have more say over their activities. All the US can do is act upon the parent Intel corporation, potentially restricting its involvement, but not directly on the subsidiary.
    Reply