Intel CEO: Sandy Bridge to Bring $125B This Year

However, the fo

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Douglas Perry
Contributor

Douglas Perry was a freelance writer for Tom's Hardware covering semiconductors, storage technology, quantum computing, and processor power delivery. He has authored several books and is currently an editor for The Oregonian/OregonLive.

  • dogman_1234
    This sounds dangerous for even consumers.
    Reply
  • warezme
    "VentureBeat reported. The publication quoted the executive stating that the Sandy Bridge "processor graphics is outperforming 40% to 50% of the discrete (stand-alone) graphics chips in the market today.”

    Which proves executives are idiots since SB can only outperform when decoding and decoding video streams because chip dedicated hard coated programming to do this. When gaming, which is what discrete video cards are for, SB is not much better than the old Intel deceleraters of old. Video encoding and decoding on GPU's has only recently been a feature and not the sole purpose of the GPU. I see the general public buying this crap and companies like Apple telling their minions to blindly believe this kind of garbage statements to sell their junk.
    Reply
  • warezme
    I meant encoding and decoding video and hard coded programming functions. I was pissed so I typed quickly.
    Reply
  • treefrog07
    I'm upgrading...as soon as I win the lottery!
    Reply
  • ProDigit10
    lol!
    8000?

    I can make my own for just under $1000!
    One corei5 2600k processor, and a Radeon HD 6850 should give a formidable gaming pc, especially for older games (of 2 years and more old).
    Reply
  • cookoy
    which makes intel processors roughly account for 10-12% of total system cost
    Reply
  • ares1214
    otacon72Try an make it hit 5Ghz on $1k...read the article..sheesh.
    I could get it to 5 GHz on a $1000 budget...its not like the budget really changes much.
    Reply
  • joytech22
    $125 Billion :o

    I can bet only $20 000 of that will go to charity or something.
    Reply
  • jimmysmitty
    warezme"VentureBeat reported. The publication quoted the executive stating that the Sandy Bridge "processor graphics is outperforming 40% to 50% of the discrete (stand-alone) graphics chips in the market today.”Which proves executives are idiots since SB can only outperform when decoding and decoding video streams because chip dedicated hard coated programming to do this. When gaming, which is what discrete video cards are for, SB is not much better than the old Intel deceleraters of old. Video encoding and decoding on GPU's has only recently been a feature and not the sole purpose of the GPU. I see the general public buying this crap and companies like Apple telling their minions to blindly believe this kind of garbage statements to sell their junk.
    Actually most benchmarks show that the HD 3000 IGP on Sandy bridge are about 2x better than what was on Clarksdale (Nehalem based) and is keeping up with most entry level discrete GPUs. Add in Quick Sync and probably much lower power usage and it is a winner.

    Power usage from THG alone was showing it being more efficient than Clarksdale CPUs with just 2 cores as well as much more efficient than Phenom II CPUs. This will translate into major power savings for laptops while also allowing for some lower end gaming that a lot of people want without having to have a battery killing discrete GPU.

    Most OEM PCs with a GPU that are not specifically gaming PCs have a entry level GPU like a HD4550 or GTS 230.
    Reply
  • blarneypete
    joytech22$125 Billion I can bet only $20 000 of that will go to charity or something.
    You can't really expect a corporation to be charitable like an individual person.

    This is where I tip my hat to Bill Gates. Like Bill, I plan to be charitable and die broke.
    Reply