
Price might be one thing holding people back from upgrading to Intel's latest Core Ultra 200S (codenamed Arrow Lake) series, which rivals some of the best CPUs on the market. But there's good news on that front! The Core Ultra 3 205 (thanks to momomo_us) could finally offer a friendly $150 option for more consumers to hop on the Arrow Lake bandwagon.
The Core Ultra 3 205 was initially spotted in a Reddit post seven months ago. It is a eight-core, eight-thread Arrow Lake processor featuring four P-cores and four E-cores. This processor has two fewer P-cores than the Core Ultra 5 225, which occupies the lowest position in Intel's desktop Arrow Lake product lineup and is currently priced at approximately $200 following recent price reductions.
The reduction in P-cores has provided Intel with greater flexibility to optimize the base clock speed of the eight-core processor. Consequently, the Core Ultra 3 205's P-core and E-core exhibit base clocks that are 15% and 19% higher, respectively, than those of the Core Ultra 5 225. However, it is important to note that, owing to the configuration, the latter possesses 33% more L3 cache.
Core Ultra 3 205 Specifications
Processor | Current Pricing | MSRP | Cores / Threads (P+E) | P-Core Base / Boost Clock (GHz) | E-Core Base / Boost Clock (GHz) | L3 Cache (MB) | PBP / MTP (W) | Memory |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Core Ultra 5 225 | $193.79 | $236 - $246 | 10 / 10 (6+4) | 3.3 / 4.9 | 2.7 / 4.4 | 20 | 65 / 121 | DDR5-6400 |
Core Ultra 5 225F | $211.24 | $221 - $231 | 10 / 10 (6+4) | 3.3 / 4.9 | 2.7 / 4.4 | 20 | 65 / 121 | DDR5-6400 |
Core Ultra 3 205 | $150.33 | ? | 8 / 8 (4+4) | 3.8 / 4.9 | 3.2 / 4.4 | 15 | 57 / 76 | DDR5-6400 |
Considering the reduced core count, the Core Ultra 3 205 exhibits significantly lower power consumption metrics compared to the Core Ultra 5 225. This is advantageous, as budget-conscious consumers are not required to allocate funds for an expensive cooling solution to manage the Core Ultra 3 205. The eight-core component demonstrates a 12% lower PBP and a 37% lower MTP relative to the Core Ultra 5 225.
Consumers are likely to be attracted to the Core Ultra 3 205 due to its pricing. That said, there may not be an MSRP since the Core Ultra 3 205 could be an OEM-exclusive part. French retailer PC21.fr has listed the forthcoming eight-core processor for $150.33, excluding value-added tax (VAT). This price is $50 lower than that of the Core Ultra 5 225.
PC21.fr specifically describes the Core Ultra 3 205 as a tray processor, which is a chip typically supplied in bulk to system integrators or OEMs. Regrettably, Intel does not seem to offer the Core Ultra 3 205 directly to individual consumers. Nevertheless, with some effort, consumers can readily locate tray chips from Intel or AMD for purchase, so that won't likely change with the Core Ultra 3 205.
Update 8/11/2025: Corrected typo from quad-core to eight-core.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

Zhiye Liu is a news editor and memory reviewer at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.
-
bit_user
This statement doesn't make sense. If it has 4P + 4E, then it's an 8-core, 8-thread processor.The article said:The Core Ultra 3 205 ... is a quad-core, eight-thread Arrow Lake processor featuring four P-cores and four E-cores.
The only way it can be 4 core/8 thread is if it has 4 older P-cores that still had Hyperthreading. That means it'd be either another Alder/Raptor Lake rebrand, or the Intel 3 port of Meteor Lake. If you knew what lithography it used (which Intel normally says, in their product database), that would tell you which. -
HideOut
you are correct, but what is most important here is that if you click on the link toms gets a cut of the sale.bit_user said:This statement doesn't make sense. If it has 4P + 4E, then it's an 8-core, 8-thread processor.
The only way it can be 4 core/8 thread is if it has 4 older P-cores that still had Hyperthreading. That means it'd be either another Alder/Raptor Lake rebrand, or the Intel 3 port of Meteor Lake. If you knew what lithography it used (which Intel normally says, in their product database), that would tell you which. -
bit_user So, I found leaked specs that say Lithography is N3B and that it's indeed a 4P + 4E CPU (i.e. 8 cores / 8 threads).Reply
https://www.techpowerup.com/331503/intel-accidently-publishes-core-ultra-3-205-arrow-lake-s-cpu-specs
That also lists the packaging specifications (LGA 1851). Along with the lithography, that further supports the idea that it's a true Arrow Lake and not a rebadged prior-gen CPU.
The burning question I have is how big the compute tile is. Is Arrow Lake known to have different sized compute tiles? -
usertests
I guess what you're getting at is: is this disabled from 8+16? I haven't heard about other dies. Even the 225 is apparently 6+4 all the way down from 8+16, which is a large cut in E-cores.bit_user said:The burning question I have is how big the compute tile is. Is Arrow Lake known to have different sized compute tiles?
IF there's a limitation that Intel must disable one E-core cluster for a bad core, I guess that explains why 3 whole clusters get disabled on a budget part.