Intel aims at AMD's Threadripper with its new Granite Rapids-WS CPU — chip armed with core count approaching the flagship AMD Threadripper 9995WX, boasts a 4.8GHz boost clock
Granite Rapids-WS has the chance to outdo Threadripper 9000WX in core count, similar to what the architecture has done for Intel on the server side.

It looks like Intel is getting ready to launch a new branch of Granite Rapids processors designed to compete directly with AMD’s Ryzen 9000WX series parts based on Zen 5. Resident X poster Momomo_us found an openbenchmark.org listing featuring an 86-core CPU codenamed Granite Rapid-WS.
The only specs we have are the cores, threads, and clock speed, featuring the aforementioned 86 cores and 172 threads operating at up to 4.8GHz. But being based on the Granite Rapids architecture, it is very likely that this chip is a much higher clocking offshoot of the Xeon 6787P, which also boasts 86 cores across two compute tiles, but peaks at a 3.8GHz peak turbo clock speed.
At 86 cores, this new chip is approaching the core count of AMD’s current Threadripper flagship, the 9995WX with 96 Zen 5 cores. This SKU might not even be the flagship part since Granite Rapids can scale up to 128 cores. Only time will tell if this is the case — to reach 128 cores, Intel has to use three compute dies, whereas with its 86-core Granite Rapid SKUs, it only needs to use two. Limiting Granite Rapids-WS to 86 cores has the potential to reduce manufacturing costs for Intel.
Rumors have been circulating about a workstation-offshoot of Granite Rapids for months. In February, we covered a Granite Rapids-W leak, allegedly stating these new workstation parts will come with up to 128 PCIe 5.0 lanes, feature eight-channel DDR5 memory support, and support Intel’s outgoing W890 chipset.
Granite Rapids is Intel’s latest generation server architecture, and one of its most competitive yet, featuring core count parity with AMD EYPC processors for the first time since 2017, when it launched in the Xeon 6900P series late last year. Similar to Arrow Lake-S, Granite Rapids is based on a tile-based architecture, featuring several I/O and compute tiles to reach previously untouchable core counts.
Intel hasn’t had a serious CPU lineup that has been able to compete with AMD’s Threadripper WX-series parts over the past two generations. Its outgoing W-3500 Sapphire Rapids Refresh chips only scale up to 60 cores, while AMD has had 96-core trims since the Threadripper 7000WX series and 64-core chips dating all the way back to the Threadripper 3000 series. With Granite Rapids-WS, Intel has its first opportunity in years to approach or outpace AMD on core count in the HEDT/workstation segment, similar to the server market.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.
-
DS426 Might actually help get AMD's TR prices a little more reasonable; sounds competitive.Reply
Limiting Granite Rapids-WS to two compute dies makes sense to me as many workstation workloads would probably prefer the higher clocks rather than having another 10 cores or even more. Need 128 cores? Just go full server CPU. -
bit_user
The main downside is that the cores are little more than a port of Raptor Cove to Intel 3.User of Computers said:Looks to be quite strong.
Looking at Granite Rapids vs. Turin benchmarks should be a fairly good guide to how well the respective workstation products will compare.
Regardless, I'm glad to see Intel staying in the workstation game. I expect they'll bring MRDIMM support, which will be a good thing. -
bit_user
But 4.8 GHz still isn't all that high-clocking.DS426 said:Limiting Granite Rapids-WS to two compute dies makes sense to me as many workstation workloads would probably prefer the higher clocks rather than having another 10 cores or even more. -
User of Computers
Raptor Cove is a quite strong core, especially when paired with the efficiency improvements that were brought about by Intel 3 (not to mention the additional cache).bit_user said:The main downside is that the cores are little more than a port of Raptor Cove to Intel 3.
Looking at Granite Rapids vs. Turin benchmarks should be a fairly good guide to how well the respective workstation products will compare.
Regardless, I'm glad to see Intel staying in the workstation game. I expect they'll bring MRDIMM support, which will be a good thing. -
bit_user
I didn't say it's bad, but the main thing you're getting over the cores in Sapphire Rapids is better efficiency. Of course, that can enable higher multi-core clock speeds, but my point was that IPC is nearly the same.User of Computers said:Raptor Cove is a quite strong core, especially when paired with the efficiency improvements that were brought about by Intel 3 (not to mention the additional cache).
As I said, there are already plenty of benchmarks between Turin and Granite Rapids, in case someone wants an idea of what to expect. -
A Stoner Competition is good. About time Intel reentered this category.Reply
Hopefully AMD can reenter the high end graphics game. -
DS426
True. My point was mainly about getting the most out of a two-compute-die Granite Rapids workstation chip. Hopefully this isn't the best that Intel can do.bit_user said:But 4.8 GHz still isn't all that high-clocking. -
derekullo
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence !User of Computers said:Looks to be quite strong. -
crumpycampbell Lolz intel like we can rip thread's too see if they can this time what's it like their 4th of 5th try now 😅Reply