Modular Motherboard? An April Fools' Joke With Actual Promise

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Michael Justin Allen Sexton is a Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He covers hardware component news, specializing in CPUs and motherboards.
  • jimmysmitty
    While interesting this would be very hard. Problem is the pinouts for Intel and AMD are different as are what they support on chip vs on chipset. If you wanted to switch from Intel to AMD or vice versa you would also have to swap out most of the other modular parts to get it to properly work.

    Would be cool though just very hard.
    Reply
  • Turb0Yoda
    And what about BiOS. That would also have to be switched out, and that would most likely cause problems with the host OS.
    Reply
  • tiagoluz8
    Just remember old days where even CPUs were expansion cards.
    Reply
  • gggplaya
    Bios wouldn't have to be swapped out. Bios manufacturers would simply need to implement code for either case and have autodetection to implement the correct code.

    The modular motherboard will have other challenges in performance and bandwidth. Seperating everything into modular peices will introduce noise and more latency. You won't be able to clock things as high and the motherboard will be slower.
    Reply
  • tiagoluz8
    let's go back to this then: http://vintagecomputer.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/IMSAI-8080-inside.jpg
    Reply
  • IInuyasha74
    17751061 said:
    And what about BiOS. That would also have to be switched out, and that would most likely cause problems with the host OS.

    Like gggplaya said, the BIOS wouldn't need changed really, but things would be different. It would need some serious UEFI BIOS innovation to make it able to autodetect all the different hardware components. Essentially what they would do is make a primary BIOS on the same slice as the chipset, and then they would put simpler chips containing universal firmware information on all of the other slices. The primary BIOS would need to load and configure it all, but it is very possible.

    @gggplaya: It wouldn't hamper performance or bandwidth at all. Nearly all of the connections already exist as hard wires, they would just need to put a break in the wire, and then have the base slice complete the connection. It would work exactly the same as current motherboards in that way. It also wouldn't have any effect on clock speed at all. There might be slightly higher latency because of the firmware changes that need made, but it is doubtful that it would have any significant impact.
    Reply
  • The Wizzard
    What you're almost describing is PICMG:
    https://www.picmg.org/openstandards/shb-express/

    It's a modular CPU carrier which connects to a backplane / bus for all PCI/PCIe connections (in PICMG 1.3). It's capable of full or half size (roughly eATX width, to ITX width) and doing a "platform" upgrade only consists of swapping one card for another. Basic I/O could easily be migrated to the carrier board via PCIe.

    I doubt you'll see modular RAM carrier sockets in the consumer world, but they do exist for servers for sure.
    Reply
  • roger smith
    we have modular motherboards. they are called motherboards.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    In the 90s, I think it was Gateway which actually had a modular motherboard: the top half holding the CPU socket, chipset, rear IOs, memory, cache, BIOS and a few other things, the other part providing all of the IOs over PCI and power.
    Reply
  • turkey3_scratch
    This is a really fascinating concept.
    Reply