GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Reportedly Shows Up In Nvidia Driver

Imagine an Intel CPU, running CUDA via ZHUDA.
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

Now that AMD's Radeon RX 6900 XT is out, things are getting heated up in the high-end graphics card space. Nvidia may be rushing to release the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti to counterattack the Radeon RX 6900 XT. A new PCI ID has emerged via pci-ids.ucw.cz of an HP OEM 452.56 graphics driver that lends credence to the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti's rumored launch next month. As this is a rumor, a degree of healthy scepticism and a large pinch of salt are required.

The current consensus is that the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti could potentially be a lesser version of the flagship GeForce RTX 3090 part. The most important specifications, such as the 10,496 CUDA cores, 328 Tensor cores and 82 RT cores are rumored to remain intact with the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. The only differentiation between the GeForce RTX 3090 and the RTX 3080 Ti comes down to the latter arriving with less memory but an identical TDP to the GeForce RTX 3080.

Zhiye Liu
News Editor, RAM Reviewer & SSD Technician

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • Colif
    blind Freddy already guessed this would exist.
    Reply
  • nofanneeded
    I ve been waiting forever for this . I hope I can get one (lol)
    Reply
  • neojack
    ahah it's all about Hubris. they want to have the bigger one.

    both competitors sells all of their stock anyways, why do they try to undercut each other i don't know, but it's good for the consumers.
    Reply
  • Gavin Greenwalt
    Will they include the NVlink connector or will they reserve that as a 3090 exclusive? That's the real question. 40GB would make for a great pair of GPUs.
    Reply
  • neojack
    Since this feature is now heavily oriented to pros / workstations, i think they would reserve it for the 3090s


    Ps : i believed vram was not cumulative in a sli setup. It has changed ?
    Reply