Nvidia Estimates $100-$300 Million in Q4 Revenue from Miners

GPU
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

Nvidia is raking in cash in the midst of ongoing graphics card shortages, but there isn't a lot of good news for gamers on the near horizon. Nvidia released its Q4 and fiscal 2021 earnings today, notching an impressive record of $5 billion in quarterly revenue, up 61% over the prior year, as it powered its way to net earnings of $1.457 billion, but the company's comments on the current mining boom paint a dire picture.

Like most semiconductor manufacturers, Nvidia has suffered from a string of crushing shortages fueled by pandemic-induced supply chain disruptions. To make matters worse for gamers searching for a graphics card, the sudden reemergence of cryptocurrency mining, particularly Ethereum, has severely worsened the situation. Nvidia doesn't expect the situation to end any time soon, either, saying that it expects shortages in the channel to last throughout the quarter.

TOPICS
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • jkflipflop98
    I really hate to even mention this. . . but Nvidia would make way more money just using their own chips to mine instead of selling them.
    Reply
  • Jim90
    Looking through the smokescreen bullcrap, deliberately selling direct to miners - and (clearly) 'encouraging' AIB's to do the same - is certainly profitable...isn't it Ngreedia?
    Let's hope every affected non-mining consumer takes note - and takes their business elsewhere when 'stocks' improve!
    Reply
  • bernieo
    To my mind, It does not make sound business sense .to upset and alienate a very large sector of your buying market .For the sake of a quick buck from miners.
    the gaming and data sales are your bread and butter. keep them happy ,they will keep coming back. Upset them they have long memories.
    Nvidia need to start selling directly to the public, with a presence from Asus Gigabyte etc etc .A combined shop as it were. (obviously 1 per customer :-) )
    Nvidia should be viewing this as a PR disaster.
    we need more stiff competition in the Gpu market .at the moment its a 2 horse race
    Reply
  • sizzling
    Jim90 said:
    Looking through the smokescreen bullcrap, deliberately selling direct to miners - and (clearly) 'encouraging' AIB's to do the same - is certainly profitable...isn't it Ngreedia?
    Let's hope every affected non-mining consumer takes note - and takes their business elsewhere when 'stocks' improve!
    Take business where? AMD are no better or worse, they just have smaller market share.
    Reply
  • This is a perfect time for Intel to mass produce their new video card and get some business
    Reply
  • MarsISwaiting
    jkflipflop98 said:
    I really hate to even mention this. . . but Nvidia would make way more money just using their own chips to mine instead of selling them.

    Well , maybe they are doing it and not telling anyone .
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    Mandark said:
    This is a perfect time for Intel to mass produce their new video card and get some business
    If it can make a meaningful amount of chips.

    Intel has been slow ramping up 10nm and 7nm got delayed by a couple of months at the very least, could be a long time before Intel catches up with demand if it ever manages to do so. We're a solid three years into Intel deploying 10nm and Intel still doesn't have enough 10nm volume to shift the desktop CPU market over at least until the end of year, slowest transition to a new process in Intel's history by multiple years.
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    InvalidError said:
    If it can make a meaningful amount of chips.

    Intel has been slow ramping up 10nm and 7nm got delayed by a couple of months at the very least, could be a long time before Intel catches up with demand if it ever manages to do so. We're a solid three years into Intel deploying 10nm and Intel still doesn't have enough 10nm volume to shift the desktop CPU market over at least until the end of year, slowest transition to a new process in Intel's history by multiple years.
    Even worse, isn't TSMC supposed to be producing Intel GPU's on their 7nm? I wouldn't expect any massive volume for Intel GPU's if they're sharing the same fabs that everyone else can't get enough capacity from.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    spongiemaster said:
    Even worse, isn't TSMC supposed to be producing Intel GPU's on their 7nm?
    There was that too.

    Practically all fabs of consequence have been maxed out for a while, are maxed out now and will remain maxed out for the foreseeable future. Doesn't matter what gets manufactured where, supplies will still be limited.
    Reply
  • usiname
    InvalidError said:
    Intel has been slow ramping up 10nm and 7nm got delayed by a couple of months at the very least, could be a long time before Intel catches up with demand if it ever manages to do so. We're a solid three years into Intel deploying 10nm and Intel still doesn't have enough 10nm volume to shift the desktop CPU market over at least until the end of year, slowest transition to a new process in Intel's history by multiple years.
    More like slowest transition in their history.
    Reply