Nvidia VSR Testing: AI Upscaling and Enhancement for Video

Nvidia VSR Enhancement, totally fake and exaggerated!
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
32

Nvidia Video Super Resolution — Nvidia VSR — officially becomes available to the public today. First previewed at CES 2023, and not to be confused with AMD's VSR (Virtual Super Resolution), Nvidia VSR aims to do for video what its DLSS technology does for games. Well, sort of. You'll need one of Nvidia's best graphics cards for starters, meaning an RTX 30- or 40-series GPU. Of course, you'll also want to set your expectations appropriately — the above lead image, for example, is faked and exaggerated and not at all representative of VSR.

By now, everyone should be getting quite familiar with some of what deep learning and AI models can accomplish. Whether it's text-to-image art generation with Stable Diffusion and the like, ChatGPT answering questions and writing articles, self-driving cars, or any number of other possibilities, AI is becoming part of our everyday lives.

YouTube YouTube
Watch On
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Jarred Walton
Senior Editor

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • Jake Hall
    So it only works in a browser?
    Reply
  • DataPotato
    A 2.9 watt algorithm restricted to only the newest 2 generations of only their card. "Nice" job Nvidia.

    Now it's AMD's turn: go make a 0.5 watt screen-space filter that runs on every card since 2004 and no one will adopt.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    Jake Hall said:
    So it only works in a browser?
    Yes, as far as I understand it, at least for now, this is purely for browsers. I wouldn't be shocked to see Nvidia offer a final version (or at least, RTX 20-enabled version) for use in other utilities like VLC, but we'll have to wait and see. I'll check with Nvidia as well to see if that's officially in the works.
    Reply
  • Jake Hall
    Yeah, I'd love to use it in Firefox, and especially VLC!
    Reply
  • PlaneInTheSky
    https://i.postimg.cc/sXf0ccX2/ghfhfhfhf.jpg

    Cool 240p image.

    This might have been interesting in the 90s when people were watching 360p cat videos.

    But video content is now 1080p+ and 4k. Video upscaling tech isn't relevant anymore.

    And this tech also comes at a cost, it drains battery life. Simply not worth it.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    PlaneInTheSky said:
    Cool 240p image.

    This might have been interesting in the 90s when people were watching 360p cat videos.

    But video content is now 1080p+ and 4k. Video upscaling tech isn't relevant anymore.

    And this tech also comes at a cost, it drains battery life. Simply not worth it.
    As noted in the text, it's an exaggerated picture to illustrate the idea — no one uses nearest neighbor interpolation unless it's for effect these days. Also, it's 360p.

    There's plenty of 720p stuff still out there, sports streams for example are regularly 1080p or lower. Also, lower bitrate can cause blocking, which the AI algorithm is also trained to at least mostly remove.

    And battery life? I guess if you're only watching videos on unplugged laptops, yes, it might drop a bit. Based on the 3050 results and a 50Wh battery, you might go from four hours of video playback to 3.3 hours if you turn on VSR and watch 720p upscaled to 4K. Except then you're on a laptop with a 1080p display most likely, which changes the upscaling requirements — there's no point in upscaling 1080p to 1080p, though perhaps the deblocking and enhancement stuff would still be useful.

    Is it a panacea? No. But is it potentially useful if you already have an RTX GPU? Sure.
    Reply
  • RTX 2080
    PlaneInTheSky said:
    Cool 240p image.

    This might have been interesting in the 90s when people were watching 360p cat videos.

    But video content is now 1080p+ and 4k. Video upscaling tech isn't relevant anymore.

    And this tech also comes at a cost, it drains battery life. Simply not worth it.

    Not all online video is 1080p or up. Many videos only go up to 1080p; upscaling to 4K would be useful.

    Additionally, if you have a bad internet connection but ample GPU power and no battery life issues (think trying to watch something in a public place using slow public wifi, but you're plugged in or have plenty of battery life) being able to upscale a lower bitrate stream into a higher one almost for free would be worthwhile to most people.

    There are also plenty of use cases out there with people wanting to watch older content that is only available at 480p.

    If you really have no use case where you find any of this at all beneficial, then just don't use it. Nobody is forcing you. There are a lot of people out there though who have use cases in which this will be helpful.
    Reply
  • garrett040
    Will this become a feature I can simply use for video files on my computer? why the browser requirement? I already bought the overpriced card.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    Thanks for the initial impression of the tech.

    How does this play when playing games and watching YT on the side? How much grunt does it take away from the GPU?

    Regards.
    Reply
  • ComputePronto
    While this is not the best AI upscaling I have seen, it is pretty good when considering that it is done with only an extra 4-8 W in real time. The browser requirement is pretty limiting, though...
    Reply