Raja Koduri Flashes 'Petaflops Scale' GPU, 4-Tile Xe HP at Hot Chips

Raja Koduri shows Intel Xe HP 4-tile GPU
(Image credit: Intel (Hot Chips))

Over the past several months, Intel's Raja Koduri has been slowly revealing portions of the upcoming Xe Graphics architecture and lineup. The Xe family will span everything from low power integrated and entry level graphics solutions under the Xe LP Graphics brand, up through data center multi-chip solutions with die stacking. The latter is we're talking about.

As discussed last week, Intel's Xe HP Graphics will come in three variants. The base model, which has been shown several times, has a single tile with 512 EUs (Execution Units) and most likely two HMB2e stacks. Intel hasn't confirmed exact specs, but it did show performance scaling for a computational workload of the 1-tile, 2-tile, and 4-tile variants:

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Jarred Walton
Senior Editor

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • nofanneeded
    That guy worked for AMD as we know :)

    4 tiles ... wonderful , he is stealing AMD Technology in ThreadRipper/Epyc design ... I think AMD is waiting for the Release , and then "Court Time" ...
    Reply
  • JayNor
    David Blythe presented a chart that showed GPU clock speeds can approach 1.7GHz at high end of voltage range of the SuperFin process.
    Reply
  • JayNor
    The CC info was that the CPUs planned for 7nm were delayed. The 7nm process was low yield. There was no mention of delaying the only 7nm GPU scheduled for 2021, which was Ponte Vecchio.

    btw, the HPG Xe chip which was listed as being fab'd externally was stated to be back in the lab already in David Blythe's presentation. Looks like this was not a last minute decision. They just didn't announce it.
    Reply
  • velocityg4
    nofanneeded said:
    That guy worked for AMD as we know :)

    4 tiles ... wonderful , he is stealing AMD Technology in ThreadRipper/Epyc design ... I think AMD is waiting for the Release , and then "Court Time" ...

    Doesn't really matter. They'd fight it in court for many years as Intel rakes in the money. Then maybe get a billion dollar slap on the wrist.
    Reply
  • PapaCrazy
    nofanneeded said:
    That guy worked for AMD as we know :)

    4 tiles ... wonderful , he is stealing AMD Technology in ThreadRipper/Epyc design ... I think AMD is waiting for the Release , and then "Court Time" ...

    There's a difference between an idea and a technology. The first multi-core CPU was made by IBM, the first dual GPU made by 3DFX. Stacking silicon is not a new idea.
    Reply
  • vinay2070
    nofanneeded said:
    That guy worked for AMD as we know :)

    4 tiles ... wonderful , he is stealing AMD Technology in ThreadRipper/Epyc design ... I think AMD is waiting for the Release , and then "Court Time" ...
    AMD themselves dont have a tiled GPU yet. How can you be so sure the technology came from the CPU department of AMD when he was working on the GPU division? This might be a totally different design internally for all you know.
    Reply
  • jefferzbooboo
    nofanneeded said:
    That guy worked for AMD as we know :)

    4 tiles ... wonderful , he is stealing AMD Technology in ThreadRipper/Epyc design ... I think AMD is waiting for the Release , and then "Court Time" ...

    Did you forget Intel used tiles (chiplets) 25 years ago with the Pentium Pro? Or Clarkdale also had tiles 10 years ago.
    I understand fanboys gotta fanboy, but at least get your info straight.
    Reply
  • Endymio
    The best thing about that humongous quad-tile chip is it will double as a liferaft, should you ever be caught at sea with one.
    Reply
  • Endymio
    jefferzbooboo said:
    Did you forget Intel used tiles (chiplets) 25 years ago with the Pentium Pro?
    The Pentium Pro merely packaged its cache separately; there was no core separation. If you're going to define the issue so loosely, then "chiplets" began all the way back in the 1970s, by IBM.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    Endymio said:
    The Pentium Pro merely packaged its cache separately; there was no core separation. If you're going to define the issue so loosely, then "chiplets" began all the way back in the 1970s, by IBM.
    And there's your problem,if you define it too tightly then intel's method is going to be different enough and if you define it too loosely then you can't defend it as a patent/IP.
    Unless intel copied any part of AMDs design 1:1 there will be no case to be had.
    Reply