Tim Berners-Lee Calls For Strong EU Net Neutrality Laws, Ban Of 'Positive Discrimination'

Tim Berners-Lee, the father of the Web, recently spoke in favor of net neutrality in a blog post on the European Union (EU) Commission's website. In his post, he called net neutrality "critical for Europe's future."

Last year, the EU Parliament managed to pass a strong net neutrality law, which was part of a larger package of laws that also included the elimination of roaming fees in EU countries. One amendment in the net neutrality law defines the term and the principle behind it:

"Net neutrality" means the principle according to which all internet traffic is treated equally, without discrimination, restriction or interference, independently of its sender, recipient, type, content, device, service or application.

The law also includes amendments that ban Internet providers from blocking competing services or throttling them. Although the EU net neutrality law allows for "specialized services," it says quite clearly that those services can't be "Internet services" but services that are sold separately from Internet access and can't interfere with the speed of the "regular" Internet. For instance, Internet providers may offer TV services that are delivered digitally through the same Internet cables, but not as part of the "Internet" package.

All in all, the EU was one of the first regions to adopt such clear and strong net neutrality laws. However, the law also needs to be approved by the individual countries inside the EU. Some countries, such as Tim Berners-Lee's own UK, isn't too fond of the idea of a strong net neutrality law. Berners-Lee seems interested in preserving the net neutrality law as is and wants to push the momentum forward for it to be adopted fully by all the EU countries, including UK.

“When I designed the Web, I deliberately built it as a neutral, creative and collaborative space, building on the openness the Internet offered. My vision was that anyone, anywhere in the world could share knowledge and ideas without needing to buy a license or ask permission from myself or any CEO, government department or committee. This openness unleashed a tidal wave of innovation, and it is still powering new breakthroughs in science, commerce, culture and much more besides," said Berners-Lee on the EU Commission's website.

Berners-Lee also discussed the hidden dangers of "positive discrimination," as he called it. He was referring to the idea of letting the Internet providers favor one service over another, which would allow them to become gatekeepers and have too much power over the content on the Internet.  

Internet users may be tricked by their Internet providers into agreeing with this positive discrimination, because they could get a certain service for free. Everyone loves free stuff, so it would be hard to resist such an offer, especially if they don't see any immediate danger in it.

However, allowing this could distort the competition in the services market, as most users would just naturally gravitate towards the "free" offer from their Internet provider instead of using a competitor's service. Internet providers would also be the ones to decide winners and losers. This is why Berners-Lee proposed that all countries explicitly ban this sort of behavior from ISPs.

The European Council, which is comprised of the heads of states of individual EU countries, is the entity that has to ultimately adopt the net neutrality law that the EU Parliament has passed. The group will conclude the net neutrality discussions in March 2015. Berners-Lee hopes the public will keep the pressure up to get the Council to accept the strong net neutrality legislation.

Follow us @tomshardware, on Facebook and on Google+.

This thread is closed for comments
10 comments
    Your comment
  • zfreak280
    I usually don't applaud anything that the EU does, but I have to applaud them on their steps towards net neutrality. It may not have as large of an impact as they desire, but at least they are trying unlike our lousy politicians here in the US.
  • Solandri
    1431429 said:
    but at least they are trying unlike our lousy politicians here in the US.

    Ahem. Not only are the U.S. politicians not trying, they're the cause of our net non-neutrality woes. They're the ones who granted Comcast, Verizon, etc. local monopolies. And it's only because of these monopolies that they can pull off this non-neutrality crap.

    Imagine if people had been able to choose between Comcast and other ISPs, and Comcast tried to throttle Netflix. They would've bled customers and put themselves out of business, as word got around that Netflix sucked on Comcast but worked great on Joe's ISP. The only reason they were able to throttle Netflix was because they knew they had a monopoly and there was no competitor their customers could flee to.
  • Sirme91
    if the EU touches net neutrality or rather doesnt reinforce that it should never ever be touched and as protected as our free speech then i wan`t my country (sweden) out of it, the corporations already have enough control around the world, the E.U needs to put it`s foot down and show they will not be compremised by them, but im still worried, we got good laws against corruption in sweden but i`m not as confident in the E.U parliment:/,

    the internet is the last and only refugee for people around the world who are opprossed , whose governments wont give them free speech,
    so they can talk to eachother online, the world will be worse off for it if it`s touched and the scariest part is how it is a real world possibility to be used as a propaganda weapon, the unrestricted internet is the whole point of the internet and it`s strongest selling point.

    And that is what make`s it more than just another media outlet, the fact that i can speak with anyone in the world, at least in the english speaking part of it, and share ideas, experinces and thoughts makes it one of the greatest inventions for mankinds furtherment of intellect in our history:)

    that`s not to say i´m not worried about how net neutrality will fare in the us, because
    i´m pretty sure it will affect everyone if net neutrality is butchered in the there. since many sites i enjoy come from the us, but i can only speculate though, who knows how it will affect me, but more importantly i`m worried about how it will affect the americans;/ it would be a sad day and a pretty big nail in the coffin of the internet`s possibilities to see it happen to the US,

    so im worried for both and it`s an unsettling thought to see it fail anywhere:)