Soft Machines Startup Promises 'Virtual Cores' Twice As Fast As Physical Cores

46

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Contributor

Lucian Armasu is a Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He covers software news and the issues surrounding privacy and security.

  • TechyInAZ
    This type of CPU is exactly what I've always thought of since I was a child. What I thought of is an octo core CPU that could virtually turn into one single core when necessary and separate into dual, triple, 5, hexa, 7 and octo core environments when needed.

    Basically, their doing exactly what I thought of years ago. So cool that we can actually start making cpus that can do this!
    Reply
  • qlum
    If this tech was used on amd it could seriously help them get back into business with their multicore cpu's being quite good at multithreaded performance but sucking at single threaded.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    With the extra complexity and latency of making out-of-order decisions in software, I would be skeptical about the conditions under which performance scaling can actually be achieved and how power-efficient the overall process would be. I find it ironic that putting OoE in the Atom is how Intel drastically improved Atom's performance per watt. Putting HT back in did not hurt either.

    At least seeing the industry fork in three different paths should make things entertaining for a while.
    Reply
  • yumri
    will it still be able to run windows 7, 8, 8.1, and 10? also will it be able to run all the programs made with the mind set of a x86 instruction set?
    Reply
  • TechyInAZ
    14444341 said:
    will it still be able to run windows 7, 8, 8.1, and 10? also will it be able to run all the programs made with the mind set of a x86 instruction set?

    We won't know until soft machines makes a x86 version.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    14444341 said:
    will it still be able to run windows 7, 8, 8.1, and 10? also will it be able to run all the programs made with the mind set of a x86 instruction set?
    Since Intel has not granted any other company a license for the x86 instruction set and AMD only has a non-transferable license, Soft Machine's CPU is almost certainly non-x86.

    That thing probably runs the ARM instruction set on their proprietary non-ARM back-end, much like what Transmeta used to do with x86.
    Reply
  • shafe88
    I've been waiting for something like this. I've had a similar idea, but never thought it was possible.
    https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/model.html?id=6fd603d6eca6ea958f217d4aca5abdac
    Reply
  • Mike Friesen
    14444477 said:
    14444341 said:
    will it still be able to run windows 7, 8, 8.1, and 10? also will it be able to run all the programs made with the mind set of a x86 instruction set?
    Since Intel has not granted any other company a license for the x86 instruction set and AMD only has a non-transferable license, Soft Machine's CPU is almost certainly non-x86.

    That thing probably runs the ARM instruction set on their proprietary non-ARM back-end, much like what Transmeta used to do with x86.

    Doesn't VIA still have an x86 licence? I doubt it's transferable, but I would't be too surprised for a band of chip veterans joining with VIA to make a new low-powered SoC. More likely though, it'll be very different from x86 or arm, because I think x86 is CISC and arm is RISC. Very different from VISC, I would assume, and if based on either, they would really just "become VISC" because if the thing that describes VISC is that it uses virtual cores.
    Reply
  • Shin-san
    It should work with any architecture. If it won't work on the x64 instruction itself, it may work on the micro-ops
    Reply
  • Ori25
    ounds a little like backward progress. Software should use more cores not make one again. We will live and see how it goes...
    Reply