64-core Ryzen Threadripper 9985WX spotted in shipping manifests — 16- and 12-core siblings also spotted

Threadripper
(Image credit: AMD)

Several new Ryzen 9000 Threadripper CPUs have been spotted at trade data aggregator NBD.ltd, thanks to Everest at X. These entries include 64-core, 16-core, and 12-core models, which are reportedly actively being shipped to different facilities, likely for validation and testing. This development does not indicate an imminent launch but rather suggests these CPUs are likely in their final development stages. It's best to approach this leak with some skepticism. Either way, we're still missing a few models, but every leak adds another piece to the Threadripper puzzle.

The Ryzen 9000 Threadripper family, codenamed "Shimada Peak", is set to be built using AMD's latest Zen 5 microarchitecture. As the core and cache configuration per CCD remains consistent with Zen 4, we can infer the flagship will offer up to 96 cores / 192 threads (12 CCDs). This would also mean a total of 384MB of L3 cache (32MB per CCD) and 96MB of L2 cache (1MB per core). There's a usual one-year cadence between AMD's desktop/server and HEDT/workstation counterparts, so Shimada Peak might be set for a reveal at Computex or later in the second half of 2025.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Hassam Nasir
Contributing Writer

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.

  • SonoraTechnical
    Could they do a Threadripper 9985 WX3D w/ 3D Cache on all 8 CCDs?
    Reply
  • Eximo
    That was the rumor late last year. The ability to disable it showed up in software. However, that doesn't mean it wasn't just a test sample or just recycled code from the desktop chips.

    High core count chips already have a large cache pool, and presumably the vast majority of workloads would not benefit from it.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    AMD, please make me regret buying AM5 and the 9950X3D with a solid value for any of these 16C+ TR platform. Show me you do have a platform that I will jump into because of plenty of lanes and cores for me to use for whatever I want. Also, decent support, please.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • jp7189
    SonoraTechnical said:
    Could they do a Threadripper 9985 WX3D w/ 3D Cache on all 8 CCDs?
    I wish, but not likely. It doesn't seem like even Epycs will get stacked cache this gen.
    Reply
  • newtechldtech
    -Fran- said:
    AMD, please make me regret buying AM5 and the 9950X3D with a solid value for any of these 16C+ TR platform. Show me you do have a platform that I will jump into because of plenty of lanes and cores for me to use for whatever I want. Also, decent support, please.

    Regards.
    Wont be cheap ... The motherboard price will be the problem , even if they sell the 16cores threadripper CPU for something like $800 , the PCIe lanes and more slots will cost alot , at least $600 for entry level Motherboard upto $2000 if all lanes and slots are used.
    Reply
  • newtechldtech
    SonoraTechnical said:
    Could they do a Threadripper 9985 WX3D w/ 3D Cache on all 8 CCDs?
    For what ? This is not a gaming CPU at all .
    Reply
  • usertests
    SonoraTechnical said:
    Could they do a Threadripper 9985 WX3D w/ 3D Cache on all 8 CCDs?
    newtechldtech said:
    For what ? This is not a gaming CPU at all .
    Unspecified workloads could benefit since there are Epyc chips like the 9684X (96 cores, 12 CCDs all with V-Cache). It's obviously not intended for any normal consumer or gamer, but neither is Threadripper, and it can exist if AMD wants to sell it.

    -Fran- said:
    AMD, please make me regret buying AM5 and the 9950X3D with a solid value for any of these 16C+ TR platform. Show me you do have a platform that I will jump into because of plenty of lanes and cores for me to use for whatever I want. Also, decent support, please.
    Value will be atrocious as long as Intel isn't releasing competitive and cheap workstation chips. If you really need those lanes and cores for your home server or whatever, you will have to reach deep into your wallet.

    In an ideal world, Threadripper and Epyc would be merged, and there would be entry-level motherboards and SKUs. Still more expensive, but reasonable.
    Reply
  • Hooda Thunkett
    "Wont be cheap ... The motherboard price will be the problem , even if they sell the 16cores threadripper CPU for something like $800 , the PCIe lanes and more slots will cost alot , at least $600 for entry level Motherboard upto $2000 if all lanes and slots are used."

    OMG! That's almost as much as a high-end GPU!
    /s
    Reply
  • Vanderlindemedia
    SonoraTechnical said:
    Could they do a Threadripper 9985 WX3D w/ 3D Cache on all 8 CCDs?

    Actually, the whole X3D cache is a Epyc cutdown.

    7H4eg2jOvVwView: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7H4eg2jOvVw

    X3D came from high end customers who needed chips with higher amounts of cache instead of cores or just speed. AMD designed certain line of EYYC's with additional cache as we're seeing in the X3D.

    Some EPYC chips did not make it, AMD hardware engineering team had to come up if the additional cache would be helpful in certain things. So the X3D was born since the extra cache helps games a lot.

    There's no benefit other then a fat flat super expensive chip for no reason, with a absurd power requirement if you would slap 8X the amount of cache onto a chip like that. Due to CCD's having to communicate with one and another the latency involved would kind of destroy the purpose of the X3D in the first place.

    Stop idolizing about a Dual CCD X3D chip - they have internally tested that and came up with, there's barely any benefit.
    Reply
  • Firestone
    People obsessing over 3D Cache don't get the point of these chips
    Reply