Core Ultra 9 285 65W CPU beats Core i9-14900K in early Geekbench benchmark — Arrow Lake chip shows 15% better multi-threaded performance than predecessor despite lacking Hyper-Threading
Arrow Lake is expected to deliver significant efficiency improvements over the last generation.
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is neck and neck against the unlocked Core i9-14900K, based on leaked benchmarks over at Geekbench. As highlighted by Benchleaks on X, the Core Ultra 9 285 is an upcoming Arrow Lake processor with a TDP of 65W, falling in the non-K category of CPUs. Despite being power-limited, the Core Ultra 9 285 easily catches up to the last generation's flagship Core i9-14900K.
The Core Ultra 9 285 packs 24 cores, divided into eight P-cores based on Lion Cove and 16 E-cores based on Skymont. Much like its unlocked counterpart, the 285 hosts a total of 76MB of total cache (40MB L2 + 36MB L3). In line with a previous benchmark, the Core Ultra 9 285 has a boost clock of 5.6 GHz, which is quite the feat as it is just 100 MHz lower than its K-equivalent.
The test bench sports GIGABYTE's Z890 UD motherboard and 32GB of DDR5-5600 memory, which should increase to DDR5-6400 if you opt for CUDIMM sticks, so there's still room for improvement.
The Core Ultra 9 285 amasses 3,247 points in the single-core category, beating the Core Ultra 7 265K. Compared to its predecessor, the Core i9-14900, the Core Ultra 9 285 is roughly 12% faster and 5% faster than the Core i9-14900K. In multi-core, the Core Ultra 9 285 breaches the 20k barrier by scoring 20,204 points, a 13% lead over its last-generation equivalent.
This is an awe-inspiring result, no matter how you look at it. The Core Ultra 9 285 has a PL1 of 65W, which can temporarily reach 182W (performance preset PL2). Even so, Intel's pivotal selling point with Arrow Lake is efficiency, and initial results hold onto that promise. These non-K CPUs should be great for power-conscious gamers and OEM machines. Likewise, seeing how well Arrow Lake scales with the 35W "T" family will be exciting whenever it launches or gets leaked.
It also indicates that Arrow Lake might have a lot of room for tuning and undervolting, giving enthusiasts another fun toy with which to tinker. The Core Ultra 200S K-series lineup will hit shelves on October 24. Following tradition, Intel might be eyeing CES 2025 to launch the mobile and non-K Arrow Lake lineups.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.
-
TheHerald True, the 35w T lineup will be the go to for efficiency oriented people. Every gen Intel sets the efficiency bar higher and higher, excited to see what they managed with arrow lake. Will they increase their lead, will they still lose to the 14900t, it's gonna be interesting. .Reply -
yahrightthere Not sure about this being true, the 14900K results isn't not showing this to be true, or am i missing something?Reply
https://browser.geekbench.com/search?q=14900khttps://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8377555 -
YSCCC
All early leaks can be some sort of propaganda one way or the other, so better wait till the mass reviews come out before becoming overly optimistic or vice versayahrightthere said:Not sure about this being true, the 14900K results isn't not showing this to be true, or am i missing something?
https://browser.geekbench.com/search?q=14900k -
jasonf2 With the 14++++++ node stick Intel just kept figuring out how crank every mhz out by bumping up TDP. It is nice to see that Intel appears to recognize that if they don't get power efficiency back to par they will ultimately lose the whole game to AMD/ARM/RISC-V.Reply -
TheHerald
It is true if you compare stock vs stock. The results you are linking might have oced memory. My 12900k can hit 20k at stock just with fast memory.yahrightthere said:Not sure about this being true, the 14900K results isn't not showing this to be true, or am i missing something?
https://browser.geekbench.com/search?q=14900khttps://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8377555
In any case, geekbench is largely useless anyways. Only the ST portion is somewhat okayish, the MT part just doesn't scale with cores. -
Alvar "Miles" Udell 50-75% faster than my 5950X. A few years ago before the GPU became more expensive than the motherboard and CPU combined, I might be tempted to upgrade.Reply -
diminishedfifth Excuse the ignorance but why would you want power efficient desktop CPU?Reply
I built a gaming PC about a year ago, so that's my baseline for things. I always assumed the purpose getting a desktop was to push maximum values, with little to no care for efficiency? -
Pigpig looks like this version is non k version, wonder why the RAM speed set to 5600mhz? suppose non k version support up to 7200mhz ram speed , at least should use 6400mhz in stead of using 5600mhzReply