Intel co-CEO David Zinsner says 'core strategy remains intact' — Intel will continue to be a products and foundry company

(Image credit: Intel)

While it is widely believed that Intel's board of directors ousted chief executive Pat Gelsinger earlier this week as they did not agree with his strategy and tactics, interim co-CEO David Zinsner said at a conference that the company's core revival strategy would remain intact. The BoD still believes that Intel should continue developing its products and maintain its manufacturing capacity to produce its own products as well as make chips for others.

"I mean, the Board was pretty clear that the core strategy remains intact," Zinsner said at the UBS Global Technology Conference this week. "We still want to be a world-class foundry, and we want to be the Western provider of leading-edge silicon to customers. That remains our goal."

One of the objections that the Board had against Pat Gelsinger was his execution on the product side of the business, as Intel Foundry can only be successful if Intel's products are successful and the chip designer can guarantee a high utilization rate for the manufacturing unit. Apparently, the BoD was not particularly happy with product delays in general and the failure to get into the AI game in particular.

Given that by now the board of directors has outlined that it needs a chief executive who can successfully execute on the product side of the business while also continuing to develop the foundry business, it is at least more or less clear what kind of person the BoD is looking for. In fact, there are very few people in the industry who have the right experience to run Intel at this point, which makes letting Pat Gelsinger go seem even more shocking. But apparently, the board somehow lost hope in Gelsinger.

"I would not read into the fact that the Board wants to focus on making sure we build out the products business and continue to execute there while standing up a foundry business as something related to Pat and the Board deciding that now is the right time," said Zinsner. "That was for personal reasons specific to Pat and the Board."

The good news is that Intel's board of directors does not seem to have immediate plans to spin off manufacturing. However, with Gelsinger out, it will be hard to find someone who has experience with executing product development and developing the foundry business.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • EzzyB
    Apparently, the BoD was not particularly happy with product delays in general and the failure to get into the AI game in particular.

    And there you go. Everyone is AI crazy and from Intel we got this recently. So, not chips, not foundry, but AI.
    Reply
  • User of Computers
    EzzyB said:
    And there you go. Everyone is AI crazy and from Intel we got this recently. So, not chips, not foundry, but AI.
    People will pay billions for Nvidia's technology. As much as it may be a bubble, they still lost out on significant market share and money because of their generally uncompetitive products.
    Reply
  • Jimbojan
    Intel board should be fired, not Gelsinger.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    I wonder what the board was expecting from the product side that Gelsinger is to blame for. All of the strategies in client and AI were set before he even stepped in the door. Of course given how ignorant of how the business works some recent board members are it could just be unrealistic expectations.

    Just a note on the Reuters article linked as a source in this article:
    Intel's foundry business, which was at the center of Gelsinger's turnaround plan, will also start to see better margins by the next year, mostly influenced by its Lunar Lake processors, Zinsner said.
    I found a transcript of the Q&A and he said no such thing so this is unfortunately shoddy reporting which seems to be happening more.
    Reply
  • Notton
    I don't think there was a single thing Gelsinger could have done to jump in on the AI bandwagon, and it was unreasonable of the BoD.

    Gelsinger was CEO starting on 2021-Feb-15.

    Arc launched in 2022, just when AI was starting to catch on.
    And this was on the heels of the NFT scams, which itself was on the heels of GPU mining for crypto.
    Arc had poor driver support at the time, and it suffered a major blow due to their global nature.
    So, no viable GPU to repurpose for AI stuff.

    Intel fabs are proprietary, so not viable for producing AI chips for other companies without a major rework.

    The entire lineup of CPUs, that's laptops, desktops, and servers, needed an overhaul. The last guy in charge did a bang up job of wasting time and resources.

    Intel managed to pump out a 40TOPS consumer NPU in the same year, 2024, as everyone else in the market did.

    I wouldn't be surprised if this decision ends up sealing the fate of Intel.
    Reply