Intel could be removed from Dow Jones due to stark stock price drop: Report
Nvidia or Texas Instruments could replace Intel in the DJIA index.
Intel and Microsoft were the first high-tech giants to be included in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) index in the late 1990s. Their growth happening at the same time as that of the PC market. But times have changed. Microsoft is now the world's second largest company by market cap due to its cloud business and supremacy in the AI sector, whereas Intel is now facing possible removal from the index due to a severe drop in its stock price this year, says analysts and investors in a Reuters report.
For the first time in 30 years, Intel's market capitalization has fallen below $100 billion, marking a significant drop from its peak in 2000. This year alone Intel's stock has plummeted nearly 60% and the company is now the poorest performer in the prestigious DJIA index. After the company announced a $1.6 billion loss for the second quarter its stock price dropped further to the lowest level among the index's constituents, prompting analysts to suggest that its removal is likely imminent.
The company's decline is partly due to missed opportunities in the rapidly growing AI sector, declining revenue and unit share on the traditional datacenter CPU market, and massive spending on manufacturing capacity amid lack of clear business prospects on the foundry market. In an attempt to reverse its fortunes, Intel has implemented several drastic measures: the company announced layoffs impacting 15% of its workforce and suspended payments of its dividends. However, some experts believe these steps may be too little, too late.
The removal of Intel from the Dow would not only impact the company's reputation but could also lead to a further decline in its stock price. Meanwhile, the Dow's selection criteria prioritize stock price over market capitalization. The highest-priced stock in the index is currently UnitedHealth Group, which is priced nearly 29 times higher than Intel, according to Reuters.
If Intel is removed from the DJIA, potential replacements include Nvidia and Texas Instruments, according to an analyst cited by the Reuters report.
Nvidia, which the world's third largest company by market capitalization, has seen its stock rise 160% this year alone. However, its volatility might be a concern for the Dow's selection committee.
On the other hand, there is Texas Instruments known for its stable performance and significant manufacturing presence in the U.S. TI's stock price has risen over 20% this year, is more in line with the average price of current Dow components.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
Kondamin Market cap lower than their assets - debt, if that isn't a sign something is fundamentally wrong with the market I don't know what would be.Reply
Maybe it's a good thing that they are out of the index as that would make them a far less interesting target for bots -
vanadiel007 And there are still commenters who insist Intel is not going bankrupt.Reply
Well, it's happening step by step in front of our eyes, if you follow the news.
They are in very serious trouble and will end up folding. -
Marlin1975 vanadiel007 said:And there are still commenters who insist Intel is not going bankrupt.
Well, it's happening step by step in front of our eyes, if you follow the news.
They are in very serious trouble and will end up folding.
I don't think they will go bankrupt. They would be bailed out or at least broken up and absorbed.
Their stock price is still to high and their manufacture side is still a mess with more broken promises everyday. "We're about to catch up... we promise the next node will not have problems..." -
Eximo An asset rich company. They can do a lot before needing to file for actual bankruptcy.Reply
Selling Altera off seems to be top of the list at the moment. -
bit_user
Stock prices are mostly based on belief in future performance.Kondamin said:Market cap lower than their assets - debt, if that isn't a sign something is fundamentally wrong with the market I don't know what would be.
Yeah, in the situation you describe, a private equity firm could theoretically acquire the company, strip it of its assets, then sell off the smoldering husk and walk away with a pocket full of cash. I'm not sure we're at that point, just yet. The assets on Intel's books aren't all so easy to unload and would depreciate in the time it took to do it.
A lot of the assets they have are necessary for their business. Sure, they had some investments (many, for strategic reasons), but those are being unwound. For the majority of their assets, liquidating them would impact their revenues, since it'd mean closing fabs, R & D facilities, etc.Eximo said:An asset rich company. They can do a lot before needing to file for actual bankruptcy. -
Avro Arrow I'm actually surprised that Intel is even on the DJIA to begin with. I thought tech companies were all listed on the NASDAQ Index.Reply -
bit_user
The Dow Jones Industrial Average is an index of 30 large companies. I gather they're generally bellwether companies, though I'm not sure there's such a simple formula determining who gets admitted.Avro Arrow said:I'm actually surprised that Intel is even on the DJIA to begin with. I thought tech companies were all listed on the NASDAQ Index.
NASDAQ is an exchange, not an index. A comparable exchange would be NYSE. It's true that lots of tech companies (including Intel) are listed on NASDAQ.
I think a lot of mutual funds and other types of investors buy a certain share of the DJIA stocks, as a matter of course. If Intel gets dropped, expect their share price to immediately tumble at least a few points. -
Nyara
This is just partly true. Most investors for example agree that Intel will pick up in some 4-6 years from now. That is future, for example, yet, it is not affecting current stock prices.bit_user said:Stock prices are mostly based on belief in future performance.
Intel right now is diverting all profits (a whopping nearly 50% margin over a huge revenue base) into investment. It needs to, it is the correct movement, Intel 7 products aren't going to sell in the near future and production rate for the newer nodes needs massive investment, one that even TSMC is struggling to make and hence why 3nm is taking forever to pick up in production rate despite the astronomical investments.
The real issue why Intel stocks are this low is not due to future belief, but due current lost of trust in the current CEO, since he literally lied and hid information to investors three times in a row.
Normally, he would get immediately changed (and in fact is getting his butt heavily filled in demands), but a tech company in a tech roadblock in an investment crunch needs of somebody with the technological knowledge to navigate that problem, and that is Pat.
So the market is stuck with an Intel that has a CEO that cannot be trusted but cannot be changed for the time being, and everyone deeply hates that, and thus hates Intel stocks due the uncertainty that a CEO that cannot be trusted brings.
Investors are forcing him to reduce the spending and bring back dividends as soon as possible as a way to alleviate the uncertainty, alongside forcing him to make a plan that includes overseers to his work in the finances of the company. Stocks will remain very low until those demands are obeyed + Arrow/Lunar Lake sales starts showing up. And everyone meanwhile are debating if Pat will even follow through or not, hence the DJIA index questioning, among other things.
Pat might even be doing this intentionally to make stock crashes, as he is using all his wage to buy Intel stocks at the moment. He is also being demanded for market manipulation. -
bit_user
This is not something you should idly speculate about. It would be hard for him to pull off such a heist (i.e. making unnecessary decisions that so greatly damage the share price), and any stock purchases he makes right now would get an incredible amount of scrutiny. If true, this is the kind of thing that can lead to jail time.Nyara said:Pat might even be doing this intentionally to make stock crashes, as he is using all his wage to buy Intel stocks at the moment. He is also being demanded for market manipulation.