Trump administration reportedly mulling a 10% stake in Intel — CHIPS Act funding could be reworked into the purchase amount

Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan in a dark suit in the shade.
(Image credit: Getty Images / Bloomberg)

President Trump's administration is reportedly in talks to acquire a 10% stake in Intel, according to Bloomberg.

Intel stock dropped on the news, but we now have further insight into how this deal may work. Sources close to the matter revealed to Bloomberg that the Trump administration will turn the rewards granted to Intel as part of the CHIPS Act into the purchase amount. Intel’s current valuation is around $100 billion, and the company has been set to receive about $10 billion in funding through the CHIPS Act. If you do the math, 10% of 100 is 10, making it a pretty clean conversion that could arrive more quickly for Intel than expected.

The CHIPS Act works on a milestone-based incentive system, meaning a company has to reach projected targets in order to unlock more funding. Intel had only received $2.2 billion up until January of this year, before Trump took office. We don’t know whether that $2.2 billion will be counted as part of the larger $10 billion that would otherwise be needed for the 10% stake.

The White House declined to comment to Bloomberg on this matter. If confirmed, this would make the U.S. government the largest stakeholder in Intel by far. Such an act wouldn’t be unprecedented either, as the U.S. Department of Defense recently invested $400 million in MP Materials Corp., a rare-earth producer, making the Pentagon its largest shareholder.

Lip-Bu Tan was installed as Intel CEO in March of this year, and since then the company has largely been on the cusp of ending its instability. Despite repeated commitments to U.S. soil and plans to bolster its fabs, Intel has faced consistent scrutiny, including Trump’s call for Tan’s resignation. Afterward, Tan visited the White House to discuss issues, including Tan’s former ties to China.

Intel has been on a downward spiral for the past two years. Where it once held a $200 billion market capitalization, it now sits at around $100 billion. Following former CEO Pat Gelsinger’s exit, Tan came in and quickly restructured the company, trimming the fat and laying off thousands of workers to focus on what matters: x86 and its ecosystem. Despite that, multiple reports have pointed toward struggles with the upcoming 18A and 14A nodes, which are Intel’s Hail Marys in the bleeding-edge semiconductor manufacturing industry.

Regardless of the specifics, this move would make Intel an even more critical player in U.S. geopolitics — going beyond just a semiconductor company and edging closer to being a lifeline for homegrown chips.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

TOPICS
Hassam Nasir
Contributing Writer

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.

  • hotaru251
    Would hope it would be read over w/ fine tooth comb making sure its the Gov investing and not a specific part (or persons) of the gov investing who could carpet pull later.
    Reply
  • SonoraTechnical
    you mean like what will happen with the Qatar 747-8i once the Trump Presidential library is established?
    Reply
  • Tanakoi
    SonoraTechnical said:
    you mean like what will happen with the Saudi 747-8i once the Trump Presidential library is established?
    You mean the Qatar 747? No one knows what will happen then, as it will depend on the current President, but if they transfer it to the Trump Presidential Library, it will remain the property of the US Government (The National Archives administers all Presidential Libraries) and would be present as a non-functional display, just as the Boeing 747 is on display in the Reagan Library.
    Reply
  • Tanakoi
    hotaru251 said:
    Would hope it would be read over w/ fine tooth comb making sure its the Gov investing and not a specific part (or persons) of the gov investing who could carpet pull later.
    From a strict economic viewpoint, such investments are a poor idea, but the view is different from a national security perspective. The US having to ask China to make the chips required for its smart weapons is probably not a good idea.
    Reply
  • SonoraTechnical
    Tanakoi said:
    You mean the Qatar 747? No one knows what will happen then, as it will depend on the current President, but if they transfer it to the Trump Presidential Library, it will remain the property of the US Government (The National Archives administers all Presidential Libraries) and would be present as a non-functional display, just as the Boeing 747 is on display in the Reagan Library.
    Corrected. Qatar. You're assuming all of the rules stay the same. You're imagining a sitting president won't modify the rules such that an ex-president can invoke the right to a large security detail and travel in the security of an ex-presidential jet once he's out of office? When Vance is Prez, he'll tell Donny he can't use the Q747? Let's see what happens....

    That said... the Gov't loan to Chrysler was a bit unlike anything that had come before it.. So in regards to Intel, there is precedent for the gov't helping out private business but taking measures to secure their interest.

    Personally, I'm in favor of the gov't taking a large interest in 'Sonoran HotDogs are Us' to insure it's good fortune, but I don't think I'll get the same treatment as a large corporation. note: I'm jesting... this is hyperbole... this is an exagerated hypothetical situation... a joke...
    Reply
  • ezst036
    Tanakoi said:
    From a strict economic viewpoint, such investments are a poor idea, but the view is different from a national security perspective. The US having to ask China to make the chips required for its smart weapons is probably not a good idea.
    The US government could just as easily ask AMD, Nvidia now has CPUs, could ask Tenstorrent, could ask IBM who still makes P.O.W.E.R. CPUs and I suspect there are many others I didn't think of at the moment. And it doesn't need to be single-provider, single architecture either.

    Fabbed in Taiwan is not China.

    There is no national security issue here.

    This is simply getting into bailout territory. Big companies should not be bailed out.
    Reply
  • Tanakoi
    SonoraTechnical said:
    You're assuming all of the rules stay the same. You're imagining a sitting president won't modify the rules such that an ex-president can invoke the right to a large security detail and travel in the security of an ex-presidential jet once he's out of office?
    I'm quoting the law. You're spinning fantasy narratives.
    ezst036 said:
    The US government could just as easily ask AMD, Nvidia now has CPUs
    Neither of them have fabs, now do they?

    ezst036 said:
    Fabbed in Taiwan is not China.
    According to China, Taiwan is a province of ... wait for it ... China. China reportedly is planning a full takeover of the island no later than 2027.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    ezst036 said:
    The US government could just as easily ask AMD, Nvidia now has CPUs, could ask Tenstorrent, could ask IBM who still makes P.O.W.E.R. CPUs and I suspect there are many others I didn't think of at the moment. And it doesn't need to be single-provider, single architecture either.
    Which of those has fabs again? Oh yeah... none of them.

    It's not about architecture as those tend to be part of the bid for making the products in the first place. It's about the manufacturing which legally has to be on US soil.

    That leaves one US owned manufacturer for leading edge production which is becoming more important. That's what all of this has been, and continues to be, about.
    Reply
  • ohio_buckeye
    The thing is, as has been said, Intel has fabs. From a national security perspective you don’t want to have to ask potential adversaries to give you chips. TSMC makes most of the CPUs for other companies like AMD, nvidia etc. So while they have good designs, Intel is a practical investment.
    Reply
  • Marlin1975
    Just came out Softbank is investing 2 billion into intel.

    Just when you think intel is not that bad off they need a 2billion cash infusion.
    Reply