Tom's Hardware Verdict
Incredible overclocking capability drives our recommendation of HyperX Gaming’s HX429C15PB3AK4/32 kit to our most-enthusiastic enthusiast readers. But we'd need to see a higher XMP rating to expend our recommendation to those who don’t overclock manually.
The best-overclocking 32GB kit we've tested
Compatible with leading motherboard-based RGB utilities
RGB control requires compatible motherboard-based utility
Comparatively high price for its DDR4-2933 rating
Ultimate value depends on overclocking skill and compliant hardware
Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.
Industry-standard DDR4 RAM speeds go all the way up to a 2666MHz. So labeling an enhanced-performance kit at merely DDR4-2933 hardly seems the best way to get attention in the crowded high-end memory space. But the results we saw from Kingston/HyperX's HX429C15PB3AK4/32 when we dropped the kit into our test bench certainly got our attention--to the point that we can heartily recommend this kit to every overclocking performance enthusiast who can afford it. But at nearly $500 as we wrote this, you're going to have to really crave impressive speeds to splurge on this kit.
We see Kingston as one of the “old guard” brands of the consumer DRAM industry. Great service and a level of quality control that usually negates the need for great service are hallmarks of such brands. Recently introduced gaming-brand initiatives have demonstrated attempts to break away from those stodgy reputations, but the DRAM coming from these daughter brands--like Kingston's HyperX--has typically been rather mundane by the standards of our most enthusiastic readers. But this particular kit goes a long way toward changing our minds about that.
Appearing quite similar to HyperX Predator DDR4 kits, such as the recently-reviewed DDR4-3333, the difference between those kits and the one we're looking at here is visible at the top of the module, where translucent plastic replaces the standard black tops here. Advertised data rates are also slower, with DDR4-2933 and DDR4-2666 XMP profiles. And the highest automatic configuration for non-XMP motherboards is set at an unimpressive DDR4-2400. An XMP timing set of 15-17-17 at DDR4-2933 is a little slower than the 14-15-15 we’d prefer. But as we're about to see, that leaves superb capacity for overclockers and timing tweakers to play.
Featuring infrared synchronization to keep all four modules displaying the same color scheme with proper timing, this kit's RGB color control is compatible with vendor-specific software, including Asus' Aura, Gigabyte's RGB Fusion, and MSI's Mystic Light. Users without such software and compatible motherboards are left to the default Rainbow wave. Unfortunately, memory lighting isn’t addressed by Kingston's own HyperX NGenuity lighting software, which works with the company's RGB peripherals.
Test & Comparison Hardware
We’re comparing Kingston’s HyperX Predator RGB directly to our most recent lighted modules, using MSI’s Z370 Godlike Gaming motherboard and the hardware from its review. Overclocked to 4.80 GHz, Intel’s Core i7-8700K works with MSI GTX 1080 Toshiba/OCZ RD400 SSD to minimize other system bottlenecks.
From the factory specs, Corsair’s Dominator Platinum SE appears to be the clear leader at DDR4-3466 CAS 16, but that kit’s lighting is merely monochromatic. Adata’s XPG Spectrix D40 looks like the closest competitor to HyperX Predator RGB, given the minimal split in data rates and RGB capability of both kits. We could still be in for some surprises though, since our review of the Ballistix Tactical Tracer RGB kit showed it to be more-overclockable than the Spectrix D40.
Overclocking & Benchmark Results
Spoiler: The HyperX Predator RGB overclocked well enough to return the DDR4-4000 column to our timings optimization table. Shown are the lowest primary timings at which each kit was completely stable over a variety of data rates.
|Lowest Stable Timings at 1.35V (Max) on MSI Z370 Godlike Gaming (BIOS A.40)|
|Row 1 - Cell 0||DDR4-4000||DDR4-3733||DDR4-3200||DDR4-2666||DDR4-2400|
|HyperX Predator RGB HX429C15PB3AK4/32 (4x 8GB single-rank)||19-20-20-40 (2T)||18-19-19-38 (2T)||15-16-16-32 (1T)||13-14-14-28 (1T)||11-12-12-28 (1T)|
|Adata XPG Spectrix D40 AX4U300038G16-QRS (4x 8GB single-rank)||X||X||15-16-16-32 (1T)||13-13-13-28 (1T)||12-12-12-28 (1T)|
|Ballistix Tact. Tracer RGB BLT4K8G4D26BFT4K (4x 8GB single-rank)||X||X||16-19-19-38 (2T)||13-16-16-32 (1T)||12-14-14-28 (1T)|
|Dominator Platinum SE CMD32GX4M4C3466C16W (4x 8GB single-rank)||X||X||14-14-14-28 (2T)||12-12-12-28 (1T)||11-11-11-28 (1T)|
While it took the better part of a day's overclocking to get there, we were able to bring the HyperX Predator RGB DDR4-2933 kit gradually up to its ultimate overclocked frequency, always suspicious that it wouldn’t reach the next multiplier. A specific sticking point with this motherboard was its inability to configure a bootable set of advanced timings for the DDR4-3866 setting, which meant we had to use a lower multiplier while gradually increasing base clock until we had reached so high a data rate that we were reasonably certain the DDR4-4000 setting would work.
DDR4-4080 is the highest data rate we've achieved on this motherboard with a 32GB kit, surpassing even the DDR4-4040 previously reached with our DDR4-3866 test kit. The board can run two single-rank DIMMs a little faster, but that would have gotten us to only 16GB.
That huge overclock helps the Predator kit slaughter its competition in the Sandra Memory Bandwidth test, sticking it to the fastest runner-up by 13%. Those who wish to live the wild life of overclocking need fear no evil from its second-place timings, though the lack of any revolution at DDR4-3200 or DDR4-2400 brings us back to reality in the Sandra Latency chart.
Our benchmarks attempt to represent both oddball extremes and ordinary scenarios. F1 2015 and 7-Zip are extraordinarily impacted by memory performance, and show the huge benefits possible with faster DRAM such as the overclocked HyperX Predator RGB, while Metro LL Redux and Blender CPU Render are typically only harmed by very slow configurations.
Most users will stick with XMP settings however, which makes the baseline settings here very unfortunate for such a capable, expensive kit. The pricing is a more realistic representation of this kit's capabilities than its specifications. Corsair's 32GB Vengeance LPX 2933, for instance, sells for over $100 less--though that kit does lack lighting.
We started out with the word “incredible” in our title, and it’s important to remember that the original meaning of that word is “not credible”. We’d love to think that every kit HyperX Gaming ships will have similar overclocking capability. But we're also fully aware of the possibility that we received an extraordinary review sample.
Frankly, either is possible. But we were encouraged upon closer inspection to see that our set uses the same Hynix H5AN8G8NMFR-UHC DRAM ICs that other reviewers and consumers have reported. We still wonder how typical this performance performance is. But since what we achieved is so impressive, we encourage every overclocker who wants a fast RGB 32GB DDR4 kit--and can afford this model's nearly $500 asking price--to try out this kit, push it to its limits, and report your findings in our response thread below.
MORE: Best Memory
MORE: All Memory Content
Intel will spend $25 billion on manufacturing its new chips at TSMC: Report
CXMT unveils China's first homegrown low-power memory - new LPDDR5-6400 adopted by Chinese smartphone makers Xiaomi and Transsion
Nvidia's Next-Gen GPUs are rumored to be codenamed 'Rubin,' arrive in 2025
You have the timings mixed up in the chart for the hyperx 2400 and 2666. Good review as usual. Thank you.Reply
Thanks for the notification, I'm opening the spreadsheet to see where the copy error occurred :)21104643 said:You have the timings mixed up in the chart for the hyperx 2400 and 2666. Good review as usual. Thank you.
Edit: Spreadsheet looks fine, it must have happened on the web side. Opening to fix it now.
Edit2: Recopied, re-pasted, verified the correct data was published, done. Thanks again!
So you're saying the Hynix chips beat Samsung B dies..... Any other memory kits that have the same Hynix chips and might be sleepers?Reply
I want to see this on the ryzen x470/370 platformReply
I want to see this on the x470/370 platformReply
That's hard to say, since I don't know how this specific firmware responds to those specific timing sets. They all appear to be configured slightly differently, and we're just happy that this one performed well.21104777 said:So you're saying the Hynix chips beat Samsung B dies..... Any other memory kits that have the same Hynix chips and might be sleepers?
Those look very nice. I just wish RAM wasn't so ridiculously expensive right now. I'd totally get a 4 x 8GB set of these.Reply