Ex-Microsoft exec unearths first-ever copy of Windows 95, in pristine condition and hidden from view since its release

A cropped photo of the first-ever copy of Windows 95 taken from the production line, by currently-retired, then-Microsoft VP Brad Silverberg.
A cropped photo of the first-ever copy of Windows 95 taken from the production line, by currently-retired, then-Microsoft VP Brad Silverberg. (Image credit: @bradsilverberg on Twitter)

Seen by some as the most important operating system ever made, Windows 95 took the world by storm when it was released 29 years ago on July 14, 1995. It turns out that some current and former Microsoft employees still have their copies, including then-VP Brad Silverberg, who possesses the first-ever copy of Windows 95 off its production line.

According to an attached receipt, Brad Silverberg's copy was acquired on July 14, 1995, just after 5 PM. Just three days ago, he posted a photograph of this historical copy of Windows 95 on Twitter in response to a larger thread started by Dave Plummer, a former developer and Software Development Manager at Microsoft.

So, what makes Brad Silverberg's copy of Windows 95 so notable? Besides being the first in history to be taken off the production line (though seemingly kept as a collector's item since), its historical value is a direct analog to the historical value of Windows 95 itself. For those who couldn't use computers at the time, Windows 95 marked the beginning of many intuitive accessibility features we take for granted in computing today— including the debut of Windows Start Menu, modern Taskbar, and Plug and Play compatibility with most peripherals.

Windows 95 is the point at which Windows starts becoming recognizable as the dominant PC operating system that most of us are still using today, even if more recent versions have been open to plenty of criticism. The biggest missing features of Windows 95 compared to its immediate successor are USB support and .NET Framework support. Still, at the time, neither of these things were even close to ubiquitous, so it didn't matter as long as Microsoft could provide an "easy" version of Windows.

Before Windows 95, using computer systems running prior versions of Windows (like Windows 3.5) or MS-DOS wasn't all that far removed from running a more complex Unix or Linux operating system. While Linux and its ilk are considered much more accessible today, they still require more technical know-how to set up and start using than modern versions of Windows, particularly since Windows 95 did most of what was needed to make an easy-to-use home computer.

Besides Brad's posting of the first copy of Windows 95, other highlights of the original Twitter thread include Dave Plummer's shrink-wrapped copy of Windows 95 "Special Edition," which is otherwise identical to the regular Windows 95 but in a special box given only to journalists, developers, and other attendees of the launch events. Brad, meanwhile, also highlighted an old photo from the RTM launch party of Windows 95.

And yes, that is a partying man being covered with whipped cream while carrying a bottle of alcohol in each hand. As Brad and perhaps even Windows 95 epitomizes, the more things change, the more they stay the same.

Christopher Harper
Contributing Writer

Christopher Harper has been a successful freelance tech writer specializing in PC hardware and gaming since 2015, and ghostwrote for various B2B clients in High School before that. Outside of work, Christopher is best known to friends and rivals as an active competitive player in various eSports (particularly fighting games and arena shooters) and a purveyor of music ranging from Jimi Hendrix to Killer Mike to the Sonic Adventure 2 soundtrack.

  • mitch074
    The first version of Windows 95 didn't support USB (nor AGP, for that matter), you had to install a patch or upgrade to OSR 2.x. Windows 95 brought hardware auto detection and peripherals Plug'n'Play.
    The task bar/start menu was pretty much lifted from the GEM graphical interface. It also brought "real" 32-bit user space support to the masses.
    Reply
  • SSGBryan
    OS/2 would like a word......
    Reply
  • NedSmelly
    It’s crazy to reflect on how much hype surrounded the Win95 release. People queueing up at night for an operating system. An OS. I even recall people buying it and not knowing what it was for.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    NedSmelly said:
    It’s crazy to reflect on how much hype surrounded the Win95 release. People queueing up at night for an operating system. An OS. I even recall people buying it and not knowing what it was for.
    The same thing happened with Win 10, just online.

    Day 0, Hour 0 of the initial Tech Preview, there were people doing the peepee dance, trying to make their download start sooner, or go faster.
    Reply
  • DSzymborski
    They really had a marketing blitz for Windows 95. And it was an important OS, too, because it was a proto-modern OS that was a big leap up for the masses. You can, of course, find OSs that implemented some of the big upgrades first, but none that had the same effect in usage among the general public. Back in the early 1990s, PCs were still described as "IBM compatible" and Windows was just another OS. Windows 95 is what basically blew much of the rest of the OS market out of the OS market.
    Reply
  • Rokinamerica
    Giddyup:
    7CMv607U5w8View: https://youtu.be/7CMv607U5w8?si=fscWwEpHmCs1LzSd
    Reply
  • adamboy64
    Rokinamerica said:
    Giddyup:
    7CMv607U5w8View: https://youtu.be/7CMv607U5w8?si=fscWwEpHmCs1LzSd
    Thanks for sharing this.
    Amazing relic from the time where computers were more like our friends.
    Reply
  • ghdavid
    I have worked at Microsoft since February 1989. On the shelf behind me is the box of Windows 3.0 that Bill Gates carried on stage at the launch event in New York on May 22, 1990.

    Box of Windows 3 autographed by Bill Gates
    Reply
  • jabliese
    They missed the most important feature of Win 95, it had a very good chance of running all day without needing a reboot.
    Reply
  • TheyCallMeContra
    mitch074 said:
    The first version of Windows 95 didn't support USB (nor AGP, for that matter), you had to install a patch or upgrade to OSR 2.x. Windows 95 brought hardware auto detection and peripherals Plug'n'Play.
    The task bar/start menu was pretty much lifted from the GEM graphical interface. It also brought "real" 32-bit user space support to the masses.

    I specifically said W95 didn't have USB support...why are you restating this as if I said otherwise? Apologies if I'm misunderstanding the intent here.
    Reply