Jaguar Shores is the successor to Intel's Falcon Shores AI accelerators — Gaudi ASICs and Xe-HPC GPUs united in a single lineup
Will it launch in time to compete against AMD and Nvidia?
While the industry anticipates the launch of its next-gen dedicated Gaudi 3 ASICs followed by Falcon Shores, both pushed into 2025; Intel has already revealed Jaguar Shores as the next successor in this lineup, per HPCwire. However, we aren't sure if Jaguar Shores will combine the CPU and GPU into a single platform, as was initially planned with Falcon Shores.
, The report says that Intel's Habana Labs division - probably unintentionally - revealed this codename during a technical workshop at the SC2024 conference. When I inquired for more details, Intel refused to comment, but that's expected since most specifications are likely not finalized by now.
For the uninitiated, Intel's current lineup includes dedicated ASICs termed "Gaudi," whose third iteration - Gaudi 3 - has been pushed back to 2025 and competes against Nvidia's last-gen Hopper-based H100. Intel's HPC and AI GPUs are side by side, and Ponte Vecchio currently sits in the world's third-fastest supercomputer, Aurora.
Intel merged these two families into a disaggregated XPU (CPU+GPU) codenamed "Falcon Shores" to further streamline its AI offerings. However, those plans have been axed, and Falcon Shores will arrive in a GPU-only configuration by late 2025. With that context in mind, we cannot say much about the design choices behind the upcoming Jaguar Shores.
Jaguar Shores is likely a GPGPU (General-Purpose GPU)—akin to Nvidia's B100, B200, and B300 chips—fabbed using an Angstrom-grade node (Intel 18A/14A). HPCwire suggests that Intel teased a Falcon Shores successor last year, slated for a 2026 launch. But will it be able to compete against Nvidia's Rubin chips by then?
Admittedly, Intel's AI accelerators pale in contrast to AMD and Nvidia, and the future of AI in the company still looks bleak. The data center is the bread and butter of Intel's financials. This likely influenced its decision to reserve an X3D-esque server cache even though Intel Foundry is more than capable of manufacturing it for the mainstream market. But not all is doom and gloom since the latest Granite Rapids CPUs with upwards of 128-core signal a potential resurgence for Intel, at least in servers and workstations.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.
-
JayNor Intel's Aurora placed first in top500 for the mixed precision performance. Those Ponte Vecchio chips were spec'd by Rick Stevens to emphasize the AI processing capabilities, and he intentionally excluded the FP64 matrix processing was implemented by AMD in Frontier.Reply -
bit_user
So, you're saying its XMX cores don't do any fp64?JayNor said:Those Ponte Vecchio chips were spec'd by Rick Stevens to emphasize the AI processing capabilities, and he intentionally excluded the FP64 matrix processing was implemented by AMD in Frontier.
Even if we consider just vector fp64, here's how AMD's last two generations compare with Intel and Nvidia @ base clocks.
ProductNode (Compute Die)fp64 TFLOPS (vector)AMD MI250XTSMC N6
28.2AMD MI300XTSMC N5
81.7Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550TSMC N5
29.5Nvidia H100TSMC 4N (N5-derivative)
33.5Nvidia B200TSMC 4NP
40.0