Sam Altman is talking to TSMC about AI chip venture

Robot hands look into a crystal ball with silicon wafers
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

One of the most unexpected stories from last week was that OpenAI's chief executive Sam Altman allegedly plans to build an AI processer that will design AI chips and produce them in-house. The Financial Times on Tuesday revealed some additional information about the venture: While Altman is indeed looking to develop his own alternative to Nvidia's AI and HPC GPUs, he's apparently talking to TSMC about chip production.

Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, is allegedly in talks with both TSMC and Middle Eastern investors to start a new chip venture aimed at reducing OpenAI's dependence on Nvidia (or rather, Azure datacenters running Nvidia's H100 that Microsoft procures in massive quantities) and fulfilling its growing need for processing power. 

The structure of Altman's new venture remains uncertain and we still don't know whether it will be a subsidiary of OpenAI or an independent entity. However, it's clear that OpenAI will be the primary customer of the venture regardless, indicating a close operational relationship.

TOPICS
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • jp7189
    This makes so much more sense than the story of Altman trying to build his own fabs.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    jp7189 said:
    This makes so much more sense than the story of Altman trying to build his own fabs.
    It's not necessarily one or the other. Maybe he wants to do some kind of partnership with TSMC on specialized fabs for AI chips. His backers could provide funding and perhaps OpenAI could provide AI tools or special guidance towards specific process enhancements that would benefit their chips. In exchange, they could get some exclusivity window on early production or something.

    I'm just saying there are other sorts of arrangements than the conventional fabless chip company model. The sums of money that have been reported definitely seem like more than you'd need just to do custom chip design, which is why I suspect there could be more to it.
    Reply