Chinese scientists claim carbon nanotube transistor breakthrough — AI performance boosts from Gate All Around design

Samsung
(Image credit: Samsung)

It is close to impossible to get into a Chinese semiconductor laboratory, but Chinese scientists are inclined to share the results of their work. Thus, our colleagues from TechXplore have found a paper from researchers at Peking University who claim to have built the industry's first tensor processing unit (TPU) featuring carbon nanotube transistors. 

Before we go into what was achieved, let us talk a bit about carbon nanotube transistors and why they are important. Carbon nanotube (CNT) transistors are essentially gate-all-around (GAA) field-effect transistors (GAA FETs) that can be applied to pretty much everything, and have all the things that one expects from a GAA transistor such as enhanced control over performance and power and reduced leakage currents. Samsung has been using GAAFETs with its 3nm-class process technologies for a while, but so far this production node has been used for fairly simple cryptocurrency mining chips. Intel uses GAA FETs for CPUs made on its 20A node, while TSMC will adopt GAA transistors with its N2 process technology that will enter mass production in the second half of 2025. 

TOPICS
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • bit_user
    The article said:
    Keeping in mind that we are talking about GAA FETs implemented using a 180 nm-class process technology, the practical applicability of this TPU is low, to say the least.
    Research tends to happen on much older nodes. The two key questions are:
    How do the CNT compare to similar CMOS transistors, on the same node?
    How well do they think the CNT will scale down to modern production nodes, both in terms of performance and manufacturability?
    Reply