Qualcomm launches global antitrust campaign against Arm — accuses Arm of restricting access to technology

Qualcomm
(Image credit: Qualcomm)

Qualcomm has accused its longtime partner, Arm Holdings, of unfair business practices, taking the matter to U.S., Europe, and South Korea regulators. The allegations claim that Arm limits access to its technologies and changes licensing models in a bid to harm competition, according to Bloomberg. Arm denies the accusations.

Qualcomm has reportedly filed secret complaints against Arm with the European Commission, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and the Korea Fair Trade Commission. Qualcomm argues that Arm's open licensing approach helped build a robust hardware and software ecosystem. However, this ecosystem is under threat now as Arm moves to restrict that access to benefit its chip design business, namely compute subsystems (CSS) reference designs for client and datacenter processors and custom silicon based on CSS for large-scale clients.

Qualcomm has presented its case to the EC, U.S. FTC, and Korea FTC behind closed doors and through formal filings, so it does not comment on the matter now. Arm rejected the accusations, stating that it is committed to innovation, competition, and upholding contract terms. The company called Qualcomm's move an attempt to shift attention from a wider commercial dispute between the two companies and use regulatory pressure for its benefit.

Indeed, the antitrust complaints align with Qualcomm's arguments in a recent legal clash with Arm in Delaware. Qualcomm won that trial, as the court ruled that the company did not break the terms of its architecture license agreement (ALA) and technology license agreement (TLA) by acquiring Nuvia and using its IP in its Snapdragon X processors for client PCs. Arm said it would seek a retrial.

However, Qualcomm seems to want to ensure that it will have access to Arm's instruction set architecture and technologies by filing complaints with antitrust regulators.

Bloomberg reports that before the Delaware court ruling in December, Qualcomm filed a formal competition complaint with the EU authorities, alleging that Arm was trying to limit license access while attempting to compete more directly. Arm has acknowledged receiving the filing and is preparing a reply. Qualcomm also reportedly met with FTC officials in Washington and then raised similar concerns with South Korea's regulatory body. Among the issues cited are withheld technologies and violations of existing agreements.

“Arm remains focused on enhancing innovation, promoting competition, and respecting contractual rights and obligations," an Arm representative said in a statement to Tom's Hardware. "Any allegation of anti-competitive conduct is nothing more than a desperate attempt by Qualcomm to detract from the merits and expand the parties’ ongoing commercial dispute for its own competitive benefit. Arm is confident that it will ultimately prevail in this dispute.”

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • TerryLaze
    Huh?!
    Qualcomm argues that Arm's open licensing approach helped build a robust hardware and software ecosystem. However, this ecosystem is under threat now as Arm moves to restrict that access to benefit its chip design business
    Isn't that common practice?!
    rar did that and zip did that and divx did that and h265 and and and, how are you possibly going to sue against something like that?
    It's their IP, unless ARM had a statement in their licensing contracts that said all licenses will be forever free access then that's it.
    Tell them to use risc-v...
    Reply
  • setx
    I hope that complains would be rejected so Qualcomm would need to abandon ARM asap.
    Reply
  • Pierce2623
    TerryLaze said:
    Huh?!

    Isn't that common practice?!
    rar did that and zip did that and divx did that and h265 and and and, how are you possibly going to sue against something like that?
    It's their IP, unless ARM had a statement in their licensing contracts that said all licenses will be forever free access then that's it.
    Tell them to use risc-v...
    This is 100% blame shifting. They’re trying to get attention off the fact that they’re using a Nuvia acquired license that was specific to server chips and have now tried to move their cellphone chips under that license too, to greatly reduce they payment agreements they already had in place with ARM.
    Reply
  • DS426
    I think Qualcomm is attempting to go after ARM now that they are both licensing and manufacturing their own chips; it creates a weird situation for existing and future partners and customers.

    I say leave Qualcomm and go full RISC-V; if ARM is fine with making things this bitter for some of their longest running and biggest customers/partners, go elsewhere. Qualcomm has the resources to build whatever they need to from the ground up without any interference or disputes with ARM.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    Qualcomm already won everything important in court this seems to be more about the future than anything else. This leads me to believe they don't have high performance RISC-V in the pipeline, don't think the switch will be smooth and/or perhaps the performance simply isn't there yet. With Arm's parent company buying Ampere there's very obvious concern to be had and Qualcomm likely sees themselves in a good position after the court victories.
    Reply
  • Mr Majestyk
    DS426 said:
    I think Qualcomm is attempting to go after ARM now that they are both licensing and manufacturing their own chips; it creates a weird situation for existing and future partners and customers.

    I say leave Qualcomm and go full RISC-V; if ARM is fine with making things this bitter for some of their longest running and biggest customers/partners, go elsewhere. Qualcomm has the resources to build whatever they need to from the ground up without any interference or disputes with ARM.
    That will take many years to accomplish. They cannot stop working on ARM, they have chips in the pipeline. Also does RISC-V come anywhere near close to performance of the SD Elite X let alone what gen 3 will bring or what Nvidia will bring in ARM. Then you have to get OS support and is Microsoft interested in doing so and if so, how long for a highly polished OS for RISC-V?
    Reply
  • palladin9479
    This stuff always happens. ARM generated a lot of goodwill buy "not being chipzilla". Of course now that they are leading a large lucrative market, they start acting like chipzilla.
    Reply
  • LordVile
    Pot calling kettle black this sounds like
    Reply
  • jp7189
    How easy is it really to move from ARM's ISA to RISC-V? I assume the vast library of software will have to run through a translation layer if there even is full feature parity between the two.
    Reply
  • DS426
    Mr Majestyk said:
    That will take many years to accomplish. They cannot stop working on ARM, they have chips in the pipeline. Also does RISC-V come anywhere near close to performance of the SD Elite X let alone what gen 3 will bring or what Nvidia will bring in ARM. Then you have to get OS support and is Microsoft interested in doing so and if so, how long for a highly polished OS for RISC-V?
    Whoops, I meant to say leave ARM and go full RISC-V, but obviously you knew what I mean against that typo.

    Yes, it would take years for ARM to wind back down from manufacturing, and no, I don't think they would do that. I'm just saying it has left their ISA licensees in a weird spot.

    I assume in theory, a RISC-V CPU could have similar performance and efficiency metrics as the same ARM CPUs -- someone just has to bring it forward. That said, no, it's still certainly a trailing ISA in terms of OS and software vendor and community support. Still, it takes a vision, taking on some risk, and making an investment for these sorts of things to come to fruition in the long run. I think Qualcomm is seeing the writing on the wall now and therefore investing for a new, more indepedent future.
    Reply