Trump wants to kill the CHIPS Act — says chipmakers are coming to the USA to avoid tariffs
‘Your CHIPS Act is a horrible, horrible thing.’

During President Trump’s first address to the joint session of Congress since taking office in January 2025, he said to the present senators and representatives, “You should get rid of the CHIPS Act, and whatever is left over, Mr. Speaker, you should use it reduce debt or any other reason you want to.” He also said during the televised speech that the CHIPS Act was a “horrible, horrible thing” and that the US has given “hundreds of billions of dollars, and it doesn’t mean a thing; they take our money, and they don’t spend it.”
The CHIPS and Science Act was a bipartisan bill approved during President Joe Biden’s term, and it allocated $52 billion in subsidies to companies, with Intel getting the largest award at nearly $7.9 billion. The total funding includes an additional $75 billion in low-interest loans. Other companies to get allocation from the federal government include TSMC, Micron, Samsung, Texas Instruments, and GlobalFoundries. The total awarded amount has reached $33 billion — meaning these are signed contracts that the government would likely have difficulty backing out of — and the Biden administration finalized the disbursements before it left office.
However, these subsidies aren’t cash payments that will be deposited in a company’s account immediately after receiving notice of the award. Instead, they are paid in tranches once an awardee has hit certain milestones. This is why Intel was frustrated with the delay in CHIPS Act payments, as it only received a total of $2.2 billion of the planned $7.86 billion as of January 2025.
There were rumors that Donald Trump opposed the subsidies his predecessor championed even while he was on the campaign trail. However, these weren’t substantiated then. Now that Trump is back in the White House, he prefers to impose tariffs instead of spending money to encourage chipmakers to build their semiconductor factories within the U.S.
Just hours before his speech, the U.S. imposed 25% tariffs on goods from Canada and Mexico. Trump also doubled the tariff rate placed on Chinese goods to 20%. This is why he’s pointing out that many companies announced investments within the country during the first few months of his presidency. According to Trump, a total of $1.7 trillion in semiconductor spending was announced since he came into power, citing figures from SoftBank ($200 billion), OpenAI and Oracle ($500 billion), Apple ($500 billion), and TSMC ($165 billion). We should note, though, that TSMC has already invested $65 billion in its Arizona fab and that it’s adding $100 billion more to expand it.
The tariffs that the White House is putting on goods — especially those coming from China, where many electronics and computer hardware come from — have likely spurred big companies to start moving their manufacturing operations into the U.S. Smaller companies like ASRock are also slowly moving out of China to avoid the worst of the tariffs. It will take time to move and set up manufacturing bases and supply chains, though, especially for things as complicated as chips. So, it's possible that the average consumer could have to deal with increasing prices while we wait for the factories within our borders to start churning out the chips, computer parts, and other electronic equipment we buy.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.
-
Jame5 have likely spurned big companies to start moving their manufacturing operations into the U.S
Spurred, as in motivated.
Spurned is to reject with disdain. If it caused them to spurn moving their manufacturing to the U.S. It means they are actively moving it elsewhere instead. -
redgarl By "CHIPMAKERS", they are simply implying "TSMC"...Reply
I would not be surprised to see this recommendation of killing the chip act actually coming from TSMC to POTUS to kill Intel. -
bit_user Trump is applying 1950's-era thinking to this problem. Yes, it matters where these things are physically made, but it ultimately matters even more who has the IP! Some of that CHIPS funding was set aside for new R&D, a lot of which is being done by startups. If those startups can't get funded, then we could lose out on the IP development needed to sustain the pipeline of semiconductor technology.Reply
On a related note, does anyone know whether DARPA funding has been cut?
https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/u-s-darpa-responds-to-chinas-gallium-export-controls-awards-raytheon-three-year-contract-to-develop-new-types-of-transistors -
bit_user
CHIPS seemed to me like it was pretty well-designed not to be simply corporate welfare. Meanwhile, the 2019 tax cuts are being extended and increased, much of which does directly benefit corporations and with far fewer (if any) strings attached.ezst036 said:... corporate welfare.
But I'll take it. I'm sick of seeing the lobbyists win. -
George³ There are many and all kinds of government aid programs that are being investigated for suspension, in order to reduce government spending in the United States. Just because such an investigation is happening, does not mean that they will necessarily be stopped. But it is possible that it will happen, or at least that the funds will be reduced, after proving that companies did not actually spend as much money on operations as they claimed. And companies always lie about their costs.Reply -
bit_user
He didn't announce an investigation. His objection is ideological. He prefers to use tariffs as an incentive, rather than subsidies.George³ said:Just because such an investigation is happening, does not mean that they will necessarily be stopped.
Based on the funding cuts that have happened so far, I think it's safe to say that any CHIPS money not yet allocated is effectively gone. The only question is what will happen to the funds that have actually been committed.
Also, as reported yesterday, the team responsible for ensuring that milestones have been reached and that the funds are being properly spent just got hit with a 40% reduction in staff.
https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/trump-purge-hits-chips-act-office-two-fifths-of-staff-to-be-terminated-reportThat's not a move you'd make, if you truly believed the funds simply needed better oversight.
That would be a crime.George³ said:And companies always lie about their costs. -
JRStern This is not thought through. Yeah, I know that doesn't surprise a lot of people.Reply
I already said recently, I'd have chosen non-cash ways to implement the Chips Act too, but just tariffs won't do it. Nations on the other side of the tariff wall will implement their own and trade with each other, because the US will remain about the highest-cost place of doing business for the foreseeable future. Nobody will design and make chips in the US and sell them outside our borders. IOW heads right for the worst case. SMH -
bluvg At the risk of being told not to stray off topic into politics when the very topic at hand is inextricably political, I will nonetheless attempt to comment as apolitically as possible given the topic:Reply
This type of uncertainty from one 4-year administration to the next leaves manufacturers operating over much longer timelines holding the bag. I can only imagine the frustration on their part; it's entirely damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't: the money was provided in tranches based on milestones for the precise reason of accountability and addressing govt waste and fraud, and now the accountability problem is "they weren't spending it fast enough"? I can only imagine the frustration and head shaking among the manufacturers.
This makes good, responsible decision-making nearly impossible, even for companies with the best-faith efforts and intentions regarding US operations. -
ex_bubblehead People in this thread are treading mighty close to the line here. There are already some ejections for crossing the line into politics and there will be more if the current line is continued. Cut out the politics of ANY kind and stick to the non political side of the story or this thread will be locked and violators sanctioned as deemed necessary.Reply