U.S. enacts law to exempt select fabs from environmental reviews
Fabs are funded under the CHIPS & Science Act.
President Joe Biden has enacted a law that exempts certain U.S. semiconductor manufacturing facilities, funded under the CHIPS & Science Act, from undergoing additional federal environmental assessments, reports Reuters. This move is intended to speed up the approval process and prevent potential delays for projects already in progress.
The new legislation prevents fab projects from being subjected to extra reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 1969. Proponents of the legislation argue that these projects already comply with existing federal, state, and local environmental regulations, and the added NEPA reviews could have delayed them for years. Some environmental groups oppose the law, however, arguing that NEPA reviews are crucial for ensuring the safety of workers and communities potentially exposed to hazardous materials used in semiconductor production.
Under the new law, passed by the House of Representatives on Sept. 24, the Department of Commerce has the authority to act as the lead agency for any semiconductor project that qualifies as a significant federal action under NEPA. This centralizes oversight and simplifies the review process when the Department of Commerce approves or regulates a project. The act also lets the DoC rely on prior environmental studies, planning documents, and decisions made by federal, state, or tribal authorities. As long as these studies meet federal standards, they can be used in place of new reviews, preventing unnecessary duplication of efforts.
There are multiple conditions that fab projects must comply with to avoid NEPA review:
- Construction of the fab started or starts before December 31, 2024.
- The project is funded in the form of a loan or loan guarantee, but not a direct grant from the federal government.
- The financial assistance provided in the form of grants and excluding any loan or loan guarantee comprises not more than 10% of the total estimated cost of the project.
The first requirement is one many chipmakers are likely to fulfill, as multiple fabs, including large projects in Ohio and Arizona, are already underway. The remaining conditions will be far more difficult to achieve. Chipmakers need substantial financial assistance to build expensive fabs in the U.S.
Additional exclusions exist for projects on sites with similar construction or expansion. The sites are owned or leased by the company receiving federal financial aid. This means that companies like Intel and TSMC will not need to wait for additional environmental reviews when they expand their Arizona and Ohio sites.
Although there are now exemptions from federal environmental reviews, the White House assures these fabs will continue to meet key ecological standards, including clean water, air quality, and endangered species protections. Also, individual states have environmental regulations that will complicate the process. For instance, Micron's planned campus in New York is an exception to the new rules, as the company still needs to adhere to the permitting processes mandated by the Clean Water Act, along with various state-level environmental laws.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
-Fran- This smells stupid, but not without a smidget of merit. The red tape some environmental agencies use as a method of (almost) extorsion is not unheard of. Middle ground if better than full exemption.Reply
What chemicals and other potentially dangerous waste do these fellas produce?
Regards. -
DS426
Yeah, I'm thinking the same; there's enough red tape and government bureaucracy to slow down what already takes years of planning, permitting, construction, testing, and ramping up equipment for these vital projects. Moreover, I expect that federal executive agencies are executing the law, not creating it.-Fran- said:This smells stupid, but not without a smidget of merit. The red tape some environmental agencies use as a method of (almost) extorsion is not unheard of. Middle ground if better than full exemption.
What chemicals and other potentially dangerous waste do these fellas produce?
Regards.
At the same time, I don't like seeing a lot of carve-outs as that tends to screw the little guys. -
umeng2002_2 No one wants poisonous chemicals spilled everywhere, but Federal regulators go way too far a lot of the time. SpaceX launches are held up by quail eggs or burned frogs or some nonsense like that.Reply -
USAFRet When relaxing environmental regulations, be careful what you wish for.Reply
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/cuyahoga-river-caught-fire-least-dozen-times-no-one-cared-until-1969-180972444/ -
AkroZ In 70's China have some environmental laws, they invited notably japanese semi-conductor companies to build factories.Reply
Some of thoses companies paid the local government to have more "lax" inspections.
A village and their lake becomes bio-hazard with deaths, the village has been evacuated and cost to contain the pollution have been heavy.
Surely a desktop worker on commerce who approved an economic project is fully competent to known if a factory will pollute or not the environment. -
thestryker
If there's a positive it's that construction has to have started by the end of this year so it's fairly targeted at Chips Act recipients.-Fran- said:This smells stupid, but not without a smidget of merit. The red tape some environmental agencies use as a method of (almost) extorsion is not unheard of. Middle ground if better than full exemption.
What chemicals and other potentially dangerous waste do these fellas produce?
Regards.
I'm not sure about what sort of chemical waste they produce, but the manufacturing process is chemical heavy. I know they try to maximize reuse (probably primarily for monetary reasons), but it's still got to have a fair amount of storage/disposal. Hopefully with the narrow timeframe it'll minimize the negative outcomes because the potential seems endless.
GN did a fairly in depth interesting documentary piece revolving around Intel's Arizona fabs which go into manufacturing a bit:
IUIh0fOUcrQView: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUIh0fOUcrQ -
USAFRet
Without getting political, Congress and Senate enact it, the President signs it.caseym54 said:Biden can enact laws now? I thought that Congress had some say in that.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/2228/text -
JTWrenn We need to stop picking and choosing who we check and instead revamp the regulatory system to be actually functional. Right now it is either non existent or just their to exact pay off which also makes it non existent for the rich.Reply
Regulations are important because greed causes corruption, but if the system doesn't work then it is just a tool of the rich to push down competition. This just sounds like the equivalent of turning off all your security when you can't get a program to run rather than getting it to all work properly. -
JTWrenn
If you click the link under "enacted a law" it takes you to the bill that went through congress. That said, I do believe you are technically correct that Presidents do not enact laws by themselves.caseym54 said:Biden can enact laws now? I thought that Congress had some say in that.