AMD Rising: CPU And GPU Market Share Growing Rapidly

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • jaber2
    Does anyone proof read these at all?
    Reply
  • nitrium
    Pretty sure my next system will be an AMD one. Currently I'm still on a i5 760, but am looking forward to replacing it with a Zen+ sometime this year. That said, single thread performance is is still a key user experience metric (unfortunately many apps still aren't multithreaded) and AMD hasn't really been able to match Intel there. Hopefully AMD have addressed this one issue I have and will increase boost clocks to more closely match Intel's with Zen+. Have to wait and see.
    Reply
  • singuy8888
    Pretty sure Lisa Su said Crypto accounts for mid single digit(5%) of total 2017 revenue, not 10%.
    Reply
  • jpe1701
    20750948 said:
    Pretty sure my next system will be an AMD one. Currently I'm still on a i5 760, but am looking forward to replacing it with a Zen+ sometime this year. That said, single thread performance is is still a key user experience metric (unfortunately many apps still aren't multithreaded) and AMD hasn't really been able to match Intel there. Hopefully AMD have addressed this one issue I have and will increase boost clocks to more closely match Intel's with Zen+. Have to wait and see.

    I can't wait to see what they have come up with but if you're coming from an i5 760 it will be great. I have started using my 1700x pc as my main computer because it can handle so much more going at once than my 6700k and things don't feel any slower so they're not too far behind already.
    Reply
  • Arbie
    @Nitrium: The small difference in AMD vs Intel in single-threaded today is immaterial next to the huge difference we'd have with AMD out of the market. Somehow they rallied and gave us a leading-edge product in Ryzen. That forced Intel to finally produce some of what they could have done years ago, with overnight announcements of more lakes than Wisconsin. Who do you want to reward with your purchase? If the AMD product is even competitive (which it certainly is!), go with them.

    AMD needs and deserves our support. They may not be able to come back from the brink again. Just consider that, and the decision is easy.
    Reply
  • btmedic04
    20750948 said:
    Pretty sure my next system will be an AMD one. Currently I'm still on a i5 760, but am looking forward to replacing it with a Zen+ sometime this year. That said, single thread performance is is still a key user experience metric (unfortunately many apps still aren't multithreaded) and AMD hasn't really been able to match Intel there. Hopefully AMD have addressed this one issue I have and will increase boost clocks to more closely match Intel's with Zen+. Have to wait and see.

    IPC wise, current gen ryzen is comparable to broadwell (intel i5/7 5xxx series) so they're not too far off. Ryzen+ will pluck the low hanging fruit and increase clock speeds but yes, we have to wait till April to find out just how much further they go. Last summer I went from an i5 3570k to a Ryzen 7 1700 and overall the platform feels much smoother so I'm happy with my purchase.

    Its great to see amd getting off of life support and I really look forward to an Athlon 64 like golden age again
    Reply
  • nitrium
    20751073 said:
    AMD needs and deserves our support. They may not be able to come back from the brink again. Just consider that, and the decision is easy.
    I'm 100% value based consumer; bang for the buck is the only thing I care about. Zero brand loyalty - after all, we don't work for them! This is why I switched to AMD for my GPU needs to an HD7950, because nVidia priced its competing GTX 770 at a significantly higher price (and with a 1GB less memory!) - that has since been replaced with an R9 390 with the same rationale (the competing GTX 970 with its paltry 3.5 GB vs 8GB on an R9 390 for the same price). Ryzen has definitely made AMD extremely compelling in the CPU space. Unless Intel drastically reduces it's prices, or the upcoming i5 8650K is something special, it'll likely be an AMD system for me.
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    20751037 said:
    Pretty sure Lisa Su said Crypto accounts for mid single digit(5%) of total 2017 revenue, not 10%.

    Might have been a misunderstanding here. I edited the article and added the direct Su quote from the Seeking Alpha transcript.
    Reply
  • Math Geek
    20751107 said:
    I'm 100% value based consumer; bang for the buck is the only thing I care about. Zero brand loyalty,

    amen to that. not a single brand is loyal to me and takes advantage whenever they get a chance. an extra 10% ipc is not worth an extra 30% in price at all. bang for the buck is the only way to go. 90% of the performance for 70% the cost is a no-brainer no matter how you try to rationalize it.
    Reply
  • Nintendork
    @NITRIUM, stop thinking about IPC, Skylake/Kabylake/CoffeeLake only got 5% extra IPC over Ryzen.

    The main difference you could see on single thread was intel's better turbo.

    IPC
    http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/amd-ryzen-5-2400g-review,8.html
    Reply