Microsoft Intros Pluton Processor, Intel and AMD To Use Xbox Security Approach for PCs

Microsoft Pluton Processor
(Image credit: Microsoft)

EDIT 11/17/2020 10:45am PT: The article has been corrected to clarify that the Pluton processor is separate from the AMD Secure Processor:

In response to a new wave of attacks that have compromised standard approaches to Windows security, Microsoft announced its Pluton security processor that will reside inside of future consumer chips from both AMD and Intel – but it's built using a technology that Microsoft and AMD pioneered with the custom processors for Xbox game consoles. It also leverages a standard feature found on AMD's EPYC server processor chips. Now Intel will adopt a similar approach to help secure PCs. 

Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • JfromNucleon
    The title is somewhat misleading, it implies that Intel is copying it when it isn't but is rather in a "partnership".
    Reply
  • jkflipflop98
    It won't take long for this to become a vulnerability itself. It's just adding a whole bunch more points of failure into the system to be attacked. Someone somewhere is going to figure out some edge-case vector and then you're fried.
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    JfromNucleon said:
    The title is somewhat misleading, it implies that Intel is copying it when it isn't but is rather in a "partnership".

    A "partnership" to adopt a security technique that AMD developed and has used since 2013 - and currently uses in several of its shipping lines of processors. Fair to say Intel is adopting the same approach - the title does not state 'copying.'
    Reply
  • JfromNucleon
    PaulAlcorn said:
    A "partnership" to adopt a security technique that AMD developed and has used since 2013 - and currently uses in several of its shipping lines of processors. Fair to say Intel is adopting the same approach - the title does not state 'copying.'
    Oh wait, seems the title changed or something cause when I came to this article it said something like "Intel copies AMD" but yeah ok I get that argument, didn't realize AMD used it for that long
    Reply
  • eye4bear
    Am I the only one who DOES NOT want Microsoft software controlling their PC processor which is running a Linux operating system because they do not trust Windows on their PC?
    Reply
  • setx
    eye4bear said:
    Am I the only one who DOES NOT want Microsoft software controlling their PC processor which is running a Linux operating system because they do not trust Windows on their PC?
    Exactly. It's a joke to trust your system security to MS. I hope that this "security" co-processor can be completely disabled by BIOS (some hardware kill switch would be better, but little hope there).
    Reply
  • kal326
    setx said:
    Exactly. It's a joke to trust your system security to MS. I hope that this "security" co-processor can be completely disabled by BIOS (some hardware kill switch would be better, but little hope there).
    There will have to be something available to either bypass when using other OSes or support within other OSes.
    AMD has been using something similar in Epyc for a while and DC gear and other OS support is widespread.
    Reply
  • neojack
    so it's like a v2 of the existing TPM chip ? (that is disabled anyways if secure boot is disabled) am i right ?
    Reply
  • d0x360
    So they could block unproved programs or modification to programs if the publisher says no.. Yeah it would actually fix cheating in games on pc but it would also probably block mods for tons of games.

    Gta online as an example... There are mods that don't help rockstar make money and they are roleplay servers which use a mod to allow private servers. That could be easily banned by this chip



    Anyone remember palidum? They tried to do this with Intel like 17 years ago or so and people revolted. Haven't heard a peep about this.
    Reply
  • d0x360
    eye4bear said:
    Am I the only one who DOES NOT want Microsoft software controlling their PC processor which is running a Linux operating system because they do not trust Windows on their PC?

    No but considering you can remove anything you want via powershell your lack of trust makes little sense.
    Reply