Plextor M8V SSD Review: BiCS Flash Hits The Mainstream

Early Verdict

Plextor has a long line of value-class consumer SSDs, but it always seems to forget to price them accordingly. The other models came to market with 850 EVO pricing, and the version we tested today has the same price as the 500GB 860 EVO. If the price was in line with the name we could recommend this model for casual users, but you might as well get the best for the same price. The M8V doesn't hold that title.

Pros

  • +

    Mainstream SSD performance with a value title

  • +

    Good recovery performance after a heavy workload

  • +

    Stronger office workload latency than the MX500

  • +

    Great software if you use it

Cons

  • -

    Priced at Samsung 860 EVO levels

  • -

    Poor notebook battery life performance

  • -

    Not much of a value

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Features & Specifications

The M8V is Plextor's new value-driven SATA SSD that takes advantage of the latest in flash technology. Strong performance drives the SATA upgrade market, but soft pricing moves the products off the shelf. Today we see if Plextor's latest low-cost entry reaches the critical balance.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Chris Ramseyer
Contributor

Chris Ramseyer was a senior contributing editor for Tom's Hardware. He tested and reviewed consumer storage.

  • Sakkura
    It has to be a bit frustrating to write a review whose entire conclusion could change at the drop of a hat... err, a price.
    Reply
  • nibb0r
    128 GB -> 119.2 GiB
    256 GB -> 238.4 GiB
    512 GB -> 476.8 GiB

    These are just calculations. Please correct me if the actual drive capacities are different.
    Reply
  • derekullo
    As soon as I read the 70% Mixed Random Workload

    This immediately started playing

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKdcjJoXeEY
    Reply
  • littleleo
    Plextor has always positioned itself as a high quality/price product line. I remember when they were called TEXEL and were competing with Toshiba for the fastest CD-ROM. They never sold on price always quality and performance. Their quality maybe good but their performance doesn't really standout to justify the higher price in this product segment. They don't have the same advantages as they did from making CD-ROMs with SSDs.
    Reply
  • Loadedaxe
    Drop it $15 and it might be worth a look. Crucial and Samsung are much better value.
    Reply