Core i7 Incompatible With Performance DDR3 Memory
Next news- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (13) |
- Share
Performance DDR3 memory that requires a voltage higher than 1.65V may permanently damage Core i7 CPUs.
It looks like Intel’s upcoming Core i7 platform will have tight limits on the maximum DIMM voltages that can be safely used. According to information uncovered at the Inquirer, motherboard manufactures have been told by Intel that DDR3 memory when set to use voltages higher than 1.65V can burn out the CPU of upcoming Core i7 platforms.
Images of an unreleased Asus X58 motherboard in its apparent retail packaging show a sticker placed across the DIMM slots stating “According to Intel CPU SPEC, DIMMs with voltage setting over 1.65V may damage the CPU permanently. We recommend you install the DIMMs with the voltage setting below 1.65V.” According to the Inquirer, Asus had said it is safely running memory kits at 1.7V in its labs, but beyond that voltage you are on your own.
When Tom’s Hardware contacted Intel on the matter, Intel told us that it could not comment since details regarding Core i7 platform overclocking have not yet been made public. Intel did say however that it feels that knowledgeable overclockers will be pleased; a statement that agrees with early reviews of the Core i7 platform.
What we do know about Intel’s upcoming Core i7 platform is that it does not use a Front-Side Bus, making CPU overclocking essentially independent of the RAM. According to Fudzilla however, CPU and memory voltages on the Core i7 platform are synchronous, creating a potential limit for extreme overclocking if the CPU can only handle 1.65V safely.
What this also means is that consumers wishing to use current generation performance DDR3 memory with a Core i7 system may be in for a disappointment. Much of the performance memory currently available use a voltage greater than 1.7V, such as Patriot’s Viper 4GB 2000 MHz DDR3 memory that operates at 2.0V. It is expected that memory manufactures will release DDR3 memory kits designed for the Core i7 platform with some manufactures already announcing such plans. For example, A-Data’s recently announced a tri-channel DDR3 memory kit that operates between 1.65V to 1.75V and offers a latency setting of 7-7-7-20 2T for DDR3-1333+.
Unlike Intel’s Core 2 platform, the Core i7 platform uses triple channel memory, meaning memory kits designed for the Core i7 platform will come with three memory sticks instead of two. This fact alone might help prevent consumers from accidentally buying memory kits incompatible with Core i7 systems. Intel is expected to release the Core i7 platform in November for the upper mainstream, performance and enthusiastic markets.
Source : Tom's Hardware
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- Any i7 adopters out there?
- Core i7 Build
- I've got new machine (I7+ Asus P6T etc') and my temp' is too high!
- Evaluate my extreme performance build for doing Work!
- AMD pushes out three more triple-core chips!!
- Intel to drop overclocking for mainstream Nehalems
- Memory speed:CPU FSB - need clarification
- Maximus II formula vs Rampage formula
- XFX 790i SLI nForce Motherboard (LGA 775) - MB-N790-IUL9
- Tom's Ultimate RAM Speed Tests - whats wrong?
- First Build, First Post, Need HELP!!!
- Need help on next RAM purchase
- First build in several years plus some questions
- New Extreme Rig Rethought
Best offers
|
16GB Cruzer USB Flash Drive | $79.99 STAPLES More info |
|
16GB Ultra II SDHC Card | $89.99 STAPLES More info |
|
512MB PC800 RDRAM RIMM Dual Channel... | $25.95 UpgradePCSolution.com More info |
|
16GB Memory Stick PRO Duo Card | $79.98 OneCall.com More info |
|
4GB Cruzer Titanium Plus USB Flash Drive | $35.00 MemorySuppliers More info |
High-Density DDR3: Five Dual-Module 8GB Kits Compared
A high-end capacity formerly reserved for servers and DDR2-based desktops (back when memory was dirt-cheap), 4GB modules are finally available for desktop DDR3 users. We test five 8GB dual-channel kits you might want to consider if 8GB makes sense. Read More
-
LGA 1156 Memory Performance: What Speed DDR3 Should You Buy?
We’ve seen how faster memory scales on Phenom II, Core 2, and Core i7 for LGA 1366. Now it’s time to analyze the impact of different memory speeds on a Core i7-870-based LGA 1156 platform. We test from DDR3-800 to -1600 at tight and loose latencies. Read More
-
Value DDR3 For Intel's P55: Six 4GB Kits Rounded Up
The exceptional value of LGA 1156-based platforms demands memory modules equal in value. Testing Newegg’s six cheapest 4GB dual-channel kits revealed some surprisingly good parts. We're comparing them today, with a definitive winner you'll want to see. Read More
All performance charts
- Samsung makes industries smallest DDR chips
- DRAM Prices on the Downward Trend
- Samsung Introduces SSDs for Low-Priced PC Market
- how much memory ddr3
- toms hardware core i7
- why is some memory for core i7
- asus x58
- what ddr3 for core i7
- core i7 memory voltage
- memory voltage i7
- what is ddr3 toms hardware
- ddr3 memory core i7
- core i7 memory voltage
- triple channel memory installing
- triple channel memory performance
- ddr3 4gb memory
- motherboard with intel and ddr3
- intel core i7 toms hardware






Hah? suck Intel with those synchronous voltage. Phenom has a better overclocking then.
^
I wouldn't trust any thing from Inquirer.
I might still buy it.But if Deneb is close,I will probably go for them since they will probably support DDR2 and DDR3,aswell as possibly better overclocking.But i7 will have triple channel...we'll see.
it still will be the fastest chipset/chip/memory we can get our hands on So yes you will still buy it!! lol j/k!
I only believe it (inquirer) because the picture speaks for itself.
If you read that lnked article in beginning, its a 2.93 overclocked on air to 4.1ghz!! thats aweosme! ITs gunna smoke AMD! sorry I gota X26000+..with a 4870 and X2 is trying to keep up with the 4870 everywhere
Actually the JEDEC standard specified DDR3 to be at 1.5 volt with the usual 5 or 10% tolerance. So called performance memory is just ordinary memory running at a higher voltage and sold at a higher (artifical) price. If intel sticks to the specifications the memory manufacturers might actually be forced to stick to the standards too. I really hope they do.
Actually the JEDEC standard specified DDR3 to be at 1.5 volt with the usual 5 or 10% tolerance. So called performance memory is just ordinary memory running at a higher voltage and sold at a higher (artifical) price. If intel sticks to the specifications the memory manufacturers might actually be forced to stick to the standards too. I really hope they do.
This is only partly true. Go buy some really fast RAM and ALSO buy the slower version of the same thing and you know what?... In a lot of cases the slower version will become unstable and crash your system much sooner that the higher speed part would at the same speed and/or voltages.
This is because the faster 'performance' RAM kits have chips with fewer imperfections that have been QCed further. The chips that aren't as pristine go to the slower parts. Its not really a new concept...cpus and graphics cards go the same way.
You are mainly paying for the better chips and the tighter QC...otherwise we'd all buy crap RAM and crank the voltage. We can't though because there is more to it than that.
true. every chip is different than the one next to it on the wafer.
so they all get tested, ranked, and sold accordingly.
^ I wouldn't trust any thing from Inquirer.
Amen.
Agreed.
Yet if i take a look at the DDR3 market all i see is modules that consume significantly more power once you cross the 1333 barrier while most 1066 modules stick to the specifications. Buying a DDR3 module for three times the price of a DDR2 module of the same size while the module doesn`t even stick to the specifications and might not run on all boards is totally unacceptable for me. Right now DDR3 is not onlay way too expensive, it is not even within specifications. And as if that wasn't enough, it doesn't really perform.
Damn, i was hoping the future memory i bought for my future 790i board would be compatible with the new i7 motherboards, if i ever decide to upgrade to the i7 that is. Is this a bad time in building a rig, any takers?
The Inquirer? oh wow, what has Tom's come to? O_O
The Inquirer almost always lies anyways.
Well, if that's true, we could be talking of another RIMM-alike fiasco. Or even worse: a burned up processors parade, lol.
Esop!