/ Sign-up

Six-Core Intel Xeon 7400 Shipping September 15

By - Source: Tom's Hardware | B 10 comments

When the going gets tough in the enterprise server sector you need big processing power. Larger and more complex database systems, scientific computation and web servers demand more and more power every other day.

More power usually ends up meaning more physical hardware taking up more space. This is something that Intel is working hard towards minimizing – increase the processing power and reducing the footprint.

The last of the Penryn class enterprise processors is on the way. Boasting a huge 16MB L3 cache. This is Intel’s first step beyond four cores. The new Xeon 7400 (Dunnington) will have six cores and be the first using the new monolithic design - multiple cores on a single die. The Xeon 7400 will be socket compatible with Xeon 7300 boards which will allow for simple upgrades with little downtime.

The Xeon 7300 series were high-wattage as well, some pushing 130 watts. The new 7400 series is targeting a much lower wattage, however no solid data has been available – upon its actual release we should start to see what kind of numbers are out there in real world application.

Previous 7300 series Xeon processors weighed in at four cores and a hefty 8 MB cache and a very large price tag that ranges between $2,200 to $2,600. As no solid pricing information has been released regarding the new 7400 series, one could expect the 7400 come in little more than current 7300 pricing while 7300 series take a price slash. It would be logical to expect pricing around $2,600 to $2,800.

Enterprise processor markets have never had consistent pricing like the consumer processor market, so finding the right deal can be a lot of work for smaller businesses that wish to save a few bucks. Larger entities tend to worry more about what it can do for them as opposed to the sticker price.

Since this will be the last of this server era from Intel, it may not see much daylight as large entities are already planning their road map towards Nehalem, especially due to the architecture’s scalability. On a side note - if rumors continue to hold true, we should be seeing the Core i7 (Nehalem) line rolling out by the end of this year.

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the News comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

This thread is closed for comments
  • 0 Hide
    alvine , September 4, 2008 10:28 PM
    t would be logical to expect pricing around $2,600 to $2,800.

    =O Holy shi for that money you can build high end system
  • 1 Hide
    mtyermom , September 4, 2008 11:44 PM
    Alvine=O Holy shi for that money you can build high end system

    These are for enterprise server application (major datacenters) and NOT for gaming PCs...

    So these prices, especially compared to the price and processing power of the previous generation (7300), are not that surprising.
  • 3 Hide
    jimmysmitty , September 5, 2008 12:11 AM
    ^Yep and mainly because the silicon used for these CPUs is of the highest quality available. They basically are the most reliable CPUs out there.

    Avery server CPU is this way and cost much more, even AMD and IBM server CPUs.
  • Display all 10 comments.
  • 1 Hide
    The_Blood_Raven , September 5, 2008 2:51 AM
    Ah, but can it play Crysis?
  • 0 Hide
    scurvywombat , September 5, 2008 4:23 AM
    I was hoping that joke would hit later rather than sooner.
  • 1 Hide
    martel80 , September 5, 2008 9:00 AM
    Alvine=O Holy shi for that money you can build high end system

    When one minute (or hour or even day) of the system operation is worth its price (like it is in enterprise), then the price itself is one of the least concerns.
  • 1 Hide
    JonathanDeane , September 5, 2008 2:28 PM
    martel80When one minute (or hour or even day) of the system operation is worth its price (like it is in enterprise), then the price itself is one of the least concerns.

    I agree, I was working for a company and our tools went down for something like 3 days (software patch issue I believe, but I was never told the actual reason) and for each of these 3 days they told me they where losing something like 2-3 million dollars. Mind you this was not that huge of a company.
  • 2 Hide
    Mucke , September 5, 2008 2:35 PM
    Buy two Denebs; more power for less money!
  • 3 Hide
    crockdaddy , September 5, 2008 4:51 PM
    I happen to think the Crysis jokes are wholly appropriate lol. To think its almost a year since release and most machines still can't run Crysis with all the bells and whistles turned on. Which belies the point as to why no one bought the game in the first place. Vote me down as you will but its true.

  • 0 Hide
    Reynod , September 10, 2008 3:37 AM
    crockdaddy that is moreso because the graphics power has not been available to push Crysis along.

    My Crysis CD is sitting here waiting too ...

    Runs like crap on a Q6600@3Ghz with a 9600GT.

    Plus I am trying to get rid of all my Nvidia cards ... before they all fail anyway. No point in overclocking an NVidia card when we know all of the 7 series and up are failty.

    Better to have 2 X 4850's (or 4879's) or an X2 version ... so the story goes.