Benchmark Results: Synthetic Benchmarks
3DMark Vantage shows Asus in the lead by a few points, but not by more than the normal margin of error. The elder board falls behind by a barely-noticeable amount.
MSI leads in PCMark, but a thorough check through BIOS and with CPU-Z didn’t reveal the source of this difference.
Gigabyte and Asus lead in Sandra’s CPU benchmarks, but differences this small could be coincidental.
The legacy motherboard leads in Sandra Memory Bandwidth by enough to explain its equally-insignificant win in some games.
79
Comments
Related Stories :
- AMD Launches 6 Core CPU-ready 890GX Mobo
- AMD 890GX Unveiled: Three Motherboards Compared
- AMD Releases Radeon HD 8970M Mobile GPU
- AMD Radeon HD 9970 Specifications Speculations
- AMD Announces Gaming-Series Radeon DDR3 Memory
- AMD Radeon HD 7990: Eight Games And A Beastly Card For $1,000
- AMD Radeon HD 7990 Benchmarks Leaked
- Report: Final AMD Radeon HD 7990 Specifications
- AMD's Radeon HD 7990 Malta Graphics Card Posted on Ebay
- Report: AMD Launching Radeon HD 7990 on April 24th; Shows Off Tomb Raider in Eyefinity 5x1
See more
Sponsored
All about Motherboards
Nice southbridge update AMD!
It is a shame you could not have added native USB 3 in there along with the SATA 3.0.
A bit more lackluster on the northbridge though.
Other than the DX10.1 update, I really see nothing new...
Nice boards.
Though honestly, I'm just awaiting a Quantum Force (Foxconn) X68 board to replace my Bloodrage. Good to see atleast someone is getting SATA 6Gb/s.
Come on AMD, give us some more juice. I don't know if my second system will be a desktop or laptop yet, and a good integrated GPU will help me decide (720p gaming on what will hopefully be a 50" plasma).
How about triple channel memory too? I'd think it'd help the GPU somewhat also.
I'm not against paying bucket loads for a motherboard (but I expect to get what I pay for).
One last thing...
DisplayPort. Give it. The faster nvidia/integrated adopt it, the faster Samsung/Dell etc. will put them on their monitors.
The industry adopted HDMI like it was nothing. DP has less licensing fees, but DP monitors are in the $500 range (granted, IPS panels etc.). We want $150 1080p DP panels please.
Horribly unexciting launch on AMD's part the only good part is that their other mobo's might come down a bit in cost hopefully.
I kinda agree there... Lackluster chipset launch.
Come on AMD, you can do it better.
Cheers!
I am not excited about this one.
Why still bothering with Ultra ATA? I like how MSI decided to trim the unnecessary in this mobo. I hope in the future a mobo manufacturer does this to the extreme. No IEEE-1394, no Ultra ATA, no floppy, no CD In, no MIDI, no PS/2 ports. You get the picture.
There are a couple things I like about the SB850. Obviously the native SATA 6.0, and also the integrated Gigabyte ethernet. No more crappy Realtek Ethernet.
The more time goes on, the more I realize a Server Mobo would be more ideal for my workstation.
Nothing to see here.
Very very unimpressive. Call me when you have a rv710 level northbridge on a 40nm process. That would hurt 5450? maybe, but 5450 is a joke to begin with, shoud've been redwood/2, would be pretty much the same die size and would allow gaming with old stuff like Wow, asian mmorpgs, etc
is a good MoBo to upgrade from AM2+ old Mobo...
Wait the 890X mobos's!
I wish AMD's product actually caught up with marketing. The on board graphic is far too weak to have "integrated gaming" that was promised to us when 690G was launched. They should put a 5450 in there or something.
Oh man...!?! I was really pulling for AMD here. Looks like they haven't improved anything over my 790FX board.
Bursts? Oh please. Hyperbole much? Especially when it refers to a bunch of soporific graphs with blanket-finish results!
Wouldn't an SSD (e.g. ioXtreme) have been a better way to test the effects of SATA 6GB/s?
Heh, Asus is borrowing cost saving tricks from it's ASRock division. I was expecting the new IGP to have at least 80 shaders and be DX11 in order to hybrid crossfire with a 4350/4550 or 5350 type card.
As an AMD fan, I find this disappointing. I would have expected more performance. I see no reason to change my 790gx board. SATA 3 looks nice on paper, but we don't have any drives that can use that bandwidth so what's the point of adoption right now?
Rofl with a lead that couldn't be noticed without testing software.
How about some overclocking tests?
I will wait for the 890FX
On a possible new build later this Spring/early Summer, I'm still waffling between a AM3 or 1156. The former offers lower cost and more PCIE lanes / better expansion; CPUs for the the latter offer much lower power usage and better performance (that I may not notice). I'm not sure this makes my choice any easier.