Benchmark Results: Synthetic Benchmarks
3DMark Vantage shows Asus in the lead by a few points, but not by more than the normal margin of error. The elder board falls behind by a barely-noticeable amount.
MSI leads in PCMark, but a thorough check through BIOS and with CPU-Z didn’t reveal the source of this difference.
Gigabyte and Asus lead in Sandra’s CPU benchmarks, but differences this small could be coincidental.
The legacy motherboard leads in Sandra Memory Bandwidth by enough to explain its equally-insignificant win in some games.
Current page: Benchmark Results: Synthetic BenchmarksPrev Page Benchmark Results: Productivity Next Page Conclusion
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
Nice southbridge update AMD!Reply
It is a shame you could not have added native USB 3 in there along with the SATA 3.0.
A bit more lackluster on the northbridge though.
Other than the DX10.1 update, I really see nothing new...
Though honestly, I'm just awaiting a Quantum Force (Foxconn) X68 board to replace my Bloodrage. Good to see atleast someone is getting SATA 6Gb/s.
Come on AMD, give us some more juice. I don't know if my second system will be a desktop or laptop yet, and a good integrated GPU will help me decide (720p gaming on what will hopefully be a 50" plasma).
How about triple channel memory too? I'd think it'd help the GPU somewhat also.
I'm not against paying bucket loads for a motherboard (but I expect to get what I pay for).
One last thing...
DisplayPort. Give it. The faster nvidia/integrated adopt it, the faster Samsung/Dell etc. will put them on their monitors.
The industry adopted HDMI like it was nothing. DP has less licensing fees, but DP monitors are in the $500 range (granted, IPS panels etc.). We want $150 1080p DP panels please.
Horribly unexciting launch on AMD's part the only good part is that their other mobo's might come down a bit in cost hopefully.Reply
I kinda agree there... Lackluster chipset launch.Reply
Come on AMD, you can do it better.
I am not excited about this one.Reply
Why still bothering with Ultra ATA? I like how MSI decided to trim the unnecessary in this mobo. I hope in the future a mobo manufacturer does this to the extreme. No IEEE-1394, no Ultra ATA, no floppy, no CD In, no MIDI, no PS/2 ports. You get the picture.Reply
There are a couple things I like about the SB850. Obviously the native SATA 6.0, and also the integrated Gigabyte ethernet. No more crappy Realtek Ethernet.
The more time goes on, the more I realize a Server Mobo would be more ideal for my workstation.
Nothing to see here.Reply
Very very unimpressive. Call me when you have a rv710 level northbridge on a 40nm process. That would hurt 5450? maybe, but 5450 is a joke to begin with, shoud've been redwood/2, would be pretty much the same die size and would allow gaming with old stuff like Wow, asian mmorpgs, etcReply
is a good MoBo to upgrade from AM2+ old Mobo...Reply
Wait the 890X mobos's!
I wish AMD's product actually caught up with marketing. The on board graphic is far too weak to have "integrated gaming" that was promised to us when 690G was launched. They should put a 5450 in there or something.Reply