Intel's new platform for Nova Lake chips leaked, up to 48 PCIe lanes and all-new chipset — 900-series motherboards with LGA1954 socket arrive in late 2026
A new product category for next-gen Intel CPUs.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
We already know that Intel pins a lot of hopes on its Nova Lake processors and hopes that they will put it back on the map for high-end desktop CPU enthusiasts, but until today we did not know almost anything about the company's next-generation 900-series chipsets that will support Nova Lake CPUs. On Monday Jaykihn, a leaker who tends to know a lot about Intel's plans, published a table describing specifications of Intel's B960, Z970, Z990, Q970, and W980 platforms.
Intel 900 Series Chipset Specifications. pic.twitter.com/vJzhBQWk4oFebruary 9, 2026
Two things that strike the eye with the new family of chipsets is the lack of the H910 platform for entry-level PCs as well as the presence of the Z970 platform for inexpensive desktops with overclocking capability, which is an all-new category of platforms. For demanding users that plan to overclock their CPUs, Intel will offer its Z990 chipset (which supports overclocking using both multiplier and BCLK), whereas those who do not plan to overclock can go with the W980, which is officially positioned as an entry-level workstation solution and therefore supports vPro technology and manageability features. In addition, Intel will have the Q970 chipset for performance-mainstream desktops. Interestingly, the Q970 will be the only chipset that will not support memory overclocking among the 900-series chipsets.
| Row 0 - Cell 0 | B960 | Z970 | Z990 | Q970 | W980 |
Total PCIe Lanes | 34 | 34 | 48 | 44 | 48 |
Processor TB4/USB4 Ports | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
DMI Gen5 Lanes | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Chipset PCIE 5.0 Lanes | 0 | 0 | 12 | 8 | 12 |
Chipset PCIE 4.0 Lanes | 14 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
SATA 3.0 (6G Lanes) | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
USB2 Ports | 12 | 12 | 14 | 14 | 14 |
USB3.2 (20G) Ports | ~2 | ~2 | ~5 | ~4 | ~5 |
USB3.2 (10G) Ports | ~4 | ~4 | ~10 | ~8 | ~10 |
USB3.2 (5G) Ports | ~6 | ~6 | ~10 | ~10 | ~10 |
IA OC | No | Yes | Yes | No | No |
BCLK OC | No | No | Yes | No | No |
Memory OC | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
Processor PCIE 5.0 Slot Lane Config | 1x16 | 1x16 | 1x16 + 1x4 | 1x8 + 2x4 | 2x8 | 4x4 | 1x16 + 1x4 | 1x8 + 2x4 | 2x8 | 4x4 | 1x16 + 1x4 | 1x8 + 2x4 | 2x8 | 4x4 |
Processor PCIE 5.0 Storage Lane Config | 1x4 | 1x4 | 1x8 or 2x4 | 1x8 or 2x4 | 1x8 or 2x4 |
ECC | No | No | No | No | Yes |
Simultaneous Displays Supported | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
PCIE RAID 0/1/5/10 Support | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
SATA RAID 0/1/5/10 Support | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Intel vPro + Standard Manageability | No | No | No | Yes | Yes |
The range-topping Z990 and W980 chipsets will offer 48 PCIe lanes (including 12 PCIe 5.0 lanes from the chipset and 16 PCIe 5.0 lanes from the CPU), two Thunderbolt 4/USB4 ports supported by the processor, 5 USB 3.2 20 Gbps, and 10 USB 3.2 10 Gbps ports. By contrast, inexpensive B960 and Z970 will only support 34 PCIe lanes (including 16 PCIe 5.0 lanes from the CPU and 14 PCIe 4.0 lanes from the chipset), one TB4/USB4 port supported by the processor, two USB 3.2 20 Gbps ports, and four USB 3.2 10 Gbps ports, according to the leak.
Intel's 900-series chipsets are expected to support Intel's Nova Lake processors that are said to use the LGA1954 socket and pack up to 52 cores, including up to 16 high-performance Coyote Cove cores, up to 32 energy-efficient Arctic Wolf cores, and four ultra-low-power cores. In addition, the new CPUs are projected to feature Xe3 integrated GPU and media engine from the Xe4 GPUs.
Although Intel has reaffirmed Nova Lake will arrive before the end of the year, the company hasn't shared any details about the processors yet. Before we see them, we expect to see a minor range of Arrow Lake Refresh chips.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
-Fran- The Z990 vs Z970 segregation is absolute garbage. Completely disgusted by Intel locking bifurcation of lanes under that arbitrary split.Reply
What a bunch of clowns.
Regards. -
rluker5 Z990 having 28 gen 5 lanes off of the CPU is quite good.Reply
The DMI being the same bandwidth as Alder Lake is a bit of a disappointment though.
A motherboard really doesn't need to use the chipset lanes that much with up to a graphics card and 3 SSDs with full gen 5, but they might wind up using mostly chipset lanes anyways so it would be good to give a close eye to the specs before a purchase.
Also Z970 is cut down real bad with connectivity. Almost in half across the board, like if you needed the rumored 2 chiplet Nova Lake beast to get full mobo connectivity. This could be a circumstantial confirmation of that rumor. -
hotaru251 intel increasing lanes on consumer platform means AMD might increase em in future as wellReply -
User of Computers What a platform! I appreciate the mid-tier option finally having overclocking support. This platform is going to absolutely rip!Reply
This is why Intel changes sockets so often, to take advantage of new technologies that really make it better for everyone. -
magbarn Reply
Aren't they basically copying AMD's market segmentation with X870/X870E?-Fran- said:The Z990 vs Z970 segregation is absolute garbage. Completely disgusted by Intel locking bifurcation of lanes under that arbitrary split.
What a bunch of clowns.
Regards. -
thestryker Reply
It's basically just the Bx60 chipset with unlocked core overclocking. That means it'll just carry a slight cost increase (otherwise why have a B series) to provide a cheaper alternative to fully utilize unlocked CPUs. Intel could have just not done this (as they have forever) and required buying the higher end chipset for said functionality.-Fran- said:The Z990 vs Z970 segregation is absolute garbage. Completely disgusted by Intel locking bifurcation of lanes under that arbitrary split.
What a bunch of clowns.
Regards.
My only question is really why Intel is even bothering at this point. However there have been rumors that Intel won't be making this generation of chipset in house. Intel rarely increases costs on chipsets so this might just be a margin play.
No matter what this isn't something to be upset by since it only provides functionality that didn't exist before. -
thestryker Reply
It's a really bad change in my book as this was the biggest platform advantage Intel had over AMD. It was definitely part of why I went Intel over AMD this last time as you can max out a PCIe 4.0 SSD on Z890 and not worry about any bandwidth constraints on any other chipset connected devices. The same will not be possible on Z990 with PCIe 5.0 drives.rluker5 said:Z990 having 28 gen 5 lanes off of the CPU is quite good.
The DMI being the same bandwidth as Alder Lake is a bit of a disappointment though.
Of course maybe they know something we don't in that it's possible AMD won't release new chipsets with PCIe 5.0 interconnect so it doesn't matter. I've assumed with the increased core counts expected with Zen 6 this would be something AMD would be keen to address though. -
-Fran- Reply
It seems you don't know what Bifurcation means.magbarn said:Aren't they basically copying AMD's market segmentation with X870/X870E?
Regards. -
-Fran- Reply
Lane bifurcation has always been part of most motherboards within the same chipset family. AMD nor Intel, up until this point, have NOT made a different chipset series by locking bifurcation. AIBs are the ones (again, up until this point) segmentating bifurcation in their motherboards, or just use whatever options AMD or Intel give them. It's the same thing as with ECC support (proper).thestryker said:It's basically just the Bx60 chipset with unlocked core overclocking. That means it'll just carry a slight cost increase (otherwise why have a B series) to provide a cheaper alternative to fully utilize unlocked CPUs. Intel could have just not done this (as they have forever) and required buying the higher end chipset for said functionality.
My only question is really why Intel is even bothering at this point. However there have been rumors that Intel won't be making this generation of chipset in house. Intel rarely increases costs on chipsets so this might just be a margin play.
No matter what this isn't something to be upset by since it only provides functionality that didn't exist before.
This is just an pretty friggen petty way to segment what little is left of a good platform and that angers me.
Get ready for people getting the Z970 board and wonder why some of their CPU-driven M.2 slots aren't working when they install the video card.
Regards.