AMD 890GX Unveiled: Three Motherboards Compared

Motherboard Features

AMD’s multi-monitor advantage comes from the way it separates PCIe and GPU functions to deliver sixteen PCIe 2.0 lanes to graphics cards (up to two) without sacrificing integrated graphics functionality. Its Catalyst driver package controls both onboard and discrete Radeon graphics controllers simultaneously, seamlessly managing multiple desktop configurations. The three boards in today’s roundup have another advantage over those of our recent H55 comparison, in that those products didn’t support DVI dual-link mode for extra-large displays.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
890GX Motherboard Features
Row 0 - Cell 0 Asus M4A89GTD Pro/USB3 Gigabyte 890GPA-UD3H MSI 890GXM-G65
PCB Revision 1.01G 1.0 1.0
Chipset AMD 890GX/SB850 AMD 890GX/SB850 AMD 890GX/SB850
Voltage Regulator Ten Phases Five Phases Five Phases
BIOS 0402 (02/09/2010) F3 (02/08/2010) V1.0B18 (02/22/2010)
200.0 MHz BCLK 200.7 MHz (+0.35%) 200.0 MHz (+0.0 MHz) 200.0 MHz (+0.0 MHz)
Clock Generator ICS 9LPRS477CKL Realtek RTM880N-793 Realtek RTM880N-793
Sideport DRAM H5TQ1G63BFR-12C 128MB DDR3-1600 H5TQ1G63BFR-12C 128MB DDR3-1600 H5TQ1G63BFR-12C 128MB DDR3-1600
Internal Interfaces
PCIe x16 2 (x16/x0, x8/x8) 2 (x16/x0, x8/x8) 2 (x16/x0, x8/x8)
PCIe x1/x4 1/1 3/0 1/0
Legacy PCI 2 2 1
USB 2.0 4 (8-ports) 4 (8-ports) 4 (8-ports)
IEEE-1394 1 2 None
Serial Port 1 1 1
Parallel Port None None 1
Floppy No Yes No
Ultra-ATA 133 1 (2-drives) 1 (2-drives) 1 (2-drives)
SATA 3.0 Gb/s None None None
SATA 6.0 Gb/s 6 6 5
4-Pin Fan 2 2 1
3-Pin Fan 2 2 1
FP-Audio Yes Yes Yes
CD-Audio No Yes Yes
S/PDIF I/O Output Only Both Output Only
Power Button No No No
Reset Button No No No
CLR_CMOS Button Jumper Only Jumper Only Jumper Only
Diagnostics Panel Pass/Fail LEDs Pass/Fail LEDs Pass/Fail LEDs
I/O Panel Connectors
P/S 2 1 1 1
USB 2.0 4 4 4
USB 3.0 2 2 2
IEEE-1394 1 1 None
Network Single Single Single
eSATA 1 None 1
CLR_CMOS Button No No No
Digital Audio Out Optical Optical Optical
Digital Audio In None None None
Analog Audio 6 6 6
Video Outputs DVI, HDMI, VGA DVI, HDMI, VGA DVI, HDMI, VGA
DVI Dual Link Yes Unverified Yes
Dual Monitor Yes Yes Yes
Mass Storage Controllers
Chipset SATA 6x SATA 6Gb/s 6x SATA 6Gb/s 6x SATA 6Gb/s
Chipset RAID Modes 0, 1, 5, 10 0, 1, 5, 10 0, 1, 5, 10
Add-In SATA JMB361 PCIe 1x eSATA 3.0 Gb/s JMB363 PCIe 1x eSATA 3.0 Gb/s None
Add-In Ultra ATA JMB361 PCIe JMB363 PCIe JMB368 PCIe
USB 3.0 NEC D720200F1 NEC D720200F1 NEC D720200F1
IEEE-1394 VT6308P PCI 2x 400 Mb/s TSB43AB23 PCI 3x 400 Mb/s None
Gigabit Ethernet
Primary LAN RTL8111E PCIe RTL8111D PCIe RTL8111DL PCIe
Secondary LAN None None None
Audio
HD Audio Codec ALC892 ALC892 ALC889
DDL/DTS Connect Unspecified Dolby Digital Live Unspecified

Unfortunately, while Gigabyte’s dual-link mode appeared to accommodate our lab's 2560x1600 display, loading the driver seemed to break this feature. This is most likely a driver bug, since AMD’s Catalyst 10.3 Preview package is not yet finished.

Another advantage today’s motherboards have over the Intel H55-based competition is the chipset’s additional PCIe 2.0 lanes, one of which supplies each of today’s motherboards with the same USB 3.0 controller at its full 5.0 Gb/s interface bandwidth. Intel’s chipset lanes run at half-speed, so that two lanes and a costly PCIe switch are required to reach the controller’s maximum throughput.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Thomas Soderstrom is a Senior Staff Editor at Tom's Hardware US. He tests and reviews cases, cooling, memory and motherboards.
  • outlw6669
    Nice southbridge update AMD!
    It is a shame you could not have added native USB 3 in there along with the SATA 3.0.

    A bit more lackluster on the northbridge though.
    Other than the DX10.1 update, I really see nothing new...
    Reply
  • anamaniac
    Nice boards.
    Though honestly, I'm just awaiting a Quantum Force (Foxconn) X68 board to replace my Bloodrage. Good to see atleast someone is getting SATA 6Gb/s.

    Come on AMD, give us some more juice. I don't know if my second system will be a desktop or laptop yet, and a good integrated GPU will help me decide (720p gaming on what will hopefully be a 50" plasma).
    How about triple channel memory too? I'd think it'd help the GPU somewhat also.
    I'm not against paying bucket loads for a motherboard (but I expect to get what I pay for).

    One last thing...
    DisplayPort. Give it. The faster nvidia/integrated adopt it, the faster Samsung/Dell etc. will put them on their monitors.
    The industry adopted HDMI like it was nothing. DP has less licensing fees, but DP monitors are in the $500 range (granted, IPS panels etc.). We want $150 1080p DP panels please.
    Reply
  • knowom
    Horribly unexciting launch on AMD's part the only good part is that their other mobo's might come down a bit in cost hopefully.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    I kinda agree there... Lackluster chipset launch.

    Come on AMD, you can do it better.

    Cheers!
    Reply
  • JohnnyLucky
    I am not excited about this one.
    Reply
  • falchard
    Why still bothering with Ultra ATA? I like how MSI decided to trim the unnecessary in this mobo. I hope in the future a mobo manufacturer does this to the extreme. No IEEE-1394, no Ultra ATA, no floppy, no CD In, no MIDI, no PS/2 ports. You get the picture.

    There are a couple things I like about the SB850. Obviously the native SATA 6.0, and also the integrated Gigabyte ethernet. No more crappy Realtek Ethernet.

    The more time goes on, the more I realize a Server Mobo would be more ideal for my workstation.
    Reply
  • jitpublisher
    Nothing to see here.
    Reply
  • Very very unimpressive. Call me when you have a rv710 level northbridge on a 40nm process. That would hurt 5450? maybe, but 5450 is a joke to begin with, shoud've been redwood/2, would be pretty much the same die size and would allow gaming with old stuff like Wow, asian mmorpgs, etc
    Reply
  • xkche
    is a good MoBo to upgrade from AM2+ old Mobo...
    Wait the 890X mobos's!
    Reply
  • Pei-chen
    I wish AMD's product actually caught up with marketing. The on board graphic is far too weak to have "integrated gaming" that was promised to us when 690G was launched. They should put a 5450 in there or something.
    Reply