Page 1:Antivirus Need...and Greed
Page 2:Contenders: AVG And GFI
Page 3:Contenders: Kaspersky And McAfee
Page 4:Contenders: Microsoft And Symantec
Page 5:How We Tested: Configuration
Page 6:How We Tested: Benchmarking
Page 7:Application Installation
Page 8:Boot Time
Page 9:Standby Time
Page 10:PCMark 7 Results
Page 11:PCMark 7 Results, Continued
Page 12:Web Page Load Time
Page 13:Scanning Time
Page 14:Do Antivirus Suites Have A Big Impact On Performance?
The funny thing about standby time as a performance metric is that it’s commonly cited, yet infrequently relevant. Think about it. How often do you actually command your system to enter standby mode and then sit around waiting for it to happen? You don’t. Much more often, your system will slip into standby or hibernation as a result of power saving during prolonged idle time—when no one is present and waiting for the process to complete.
Still, standby is generally held up as another indicator of system impact, so we ran the tests.
Here we see a bit more differentiation than in our boot time results. Again, GFI turns in the best score of the group, still somehow beating our clean configuration. Now, though, McAfee and Microsoft also slip in ahead of our AV-free system. Symantec barely registers a slight impact, and Kaspersky and AVG come in close together at the back of the pack.
Despite there being a 28% variance from first to last place in this group, we’re not sure how much emphasis to place on this as a statement about overall performance. A positive or negative range of only nine seconds on a relatively slow system disk is fairly minor no matter how you look at it.
- Antivirus Need...and Greed
- Contenders: AVG And GFI
- Contenders: Kaspersky And McAfee
- Contenders: Microsoft And Symantec
- How We Tested: Configuration
- How We Tested: Benchmarking
- Application Installation
- Boot Time
- Standby Time
- PCMark 7 Results
- PCMark 7 Results, Continued
- Web Page Load Time
- Scanning Time
- Do Antivirus Suites Have A Big Impact On Performance?