Shop for Computer Cooling Fans
|
CNPS7000B-AlCu LED CPU Cooler |
Compare the top 5 lowest prices by hovering your mouse over the product names on the left |
$30.35 |
|
Vanquisher CPU Cooler | $24.99 | |
|
CL-P0401 V1 CPU Cooler | $69.99 | |
|
HDT-S1283 CPU Cooler | $34.99 | |
|
Zalman CNPS9500 AM2 CPU Cooler | $55.99 |
The CPU Articles
- Getting Up to Speed: XP-TMC Adapter Socket from Upgradeware Unlocks...
- Bidding Adieu: P4 3.2 vs. Athlon XP 3200+
- Intel Rigs Up: P4 Series with FSB800
- High-Flying: AMD Athlon XP 3200+ Squares Off Against Intel P4 3 GHz
- Duel of the Titans: Opteron vs. Xeon
- VapoChill Puts a Pentium 4 with 800 MHz FSB within Reach
- Benchmark Marathon: 65 CPUs from 100 MHz to 3066 MHz
- Barton's Here: Athlon XP 3000+ vs. P4 3.06 GHz
- The Resurrection: Pentium III 1.4 GHz on Slot-1 Motherboards
- HyperThreading Threads Its Way into Application
PC Mark 2002
1:02 PM - August 11, 2003 by
Frank Völkel
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: dual, xeon, duo
Syndication:
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: dual, xeon, duo
Syndication:
Table of Contents:
PC Mark 2002
The additional L3 cache allows the dual Xeon to raise the relatively low memory performance (FSB speed, etc.). However, the P4 with 3.2 GHz and FSB800 is clearly in the lead in combination with the Intel 875P chipset. In this benchmark, the cache expansion causes an increase in memory performance of 6.9 percent.
Distributed Computing: SETI (Text Client 3.04)
In the SETI project, a 340 kB data packet is analyzed. The benchmark shows that the expanded cache of the dual Xeon system is very noticeable here. The performance increase is around 31.1 percent.
- Previous page MainConcept 1.3
- Next page CPU Benchmark: SPEC CPU 2000
