Page 1:Who'se Got Game For Under $150?
Page 2:Testing Methodology
Page 3:Test System And Benchmarks
Page 4:Benchmark Results: 3DMark Vantage
Page 5:Benchmark Results: Crysis
Page 6:Benchmark Results: Aliens Vs. Predator
Page 7:Benchmark Results: Far Cry 2
Page 8:Benchmark Results: World In Conflict
Page 9:Benchmark Results: DiRT 2
Page 10:Multitasking Benchmark
Page 11:Conclusion: Three Processors Stand Above The Sub-$150 Crowd
In our final benchmark, we're going to do things a little differently. We're going to measure Crysis benchmark performance during the creation of a .RAR file and this should show us the game performance we can expect out of these processors for multi-tasking applications.
These results are interesting in that we can see that the Core i3 processors take a much harder performance hit during multitasking usage models compared to true quad-core options. Indeed, even the budget Athlon II X3 445’s performance is close to that of the Core i3 when running concurrent applications. This is likely because Hyper-Threading isn't as effective as an additional physical CPU core when multiple threads are executed. It's an interesting experiment, and in this case, the Phenom II X4 940/945 shows a definite advantage over all of the other sub-$150 CPUs.
- Who'se Got Game For Under $150?
- Testing Methodology
- Test System And Benchmarks
- Benchmark Results: 3DMark Vantage
- Benchmark Results: Crysis
- Benchmark Results: Aliens Vs. Predator
- Benchmark Results: Far Cry 2
- Benchmark Results: World In Conflict
- Benchmark Results: DiRT 2
- Multitasking Benchmark
- Conclusion: Three Processors Stand Above The Sub-$150 Crowd