- 440BX Motherboard Review - Summer 1999
- Early Athlon Motherboard Review
- Preview of Intel's Upcoming 'Camino'-Chipset
- Preview of VIA's upcoming Apollo Pro+ 133 Chipset
- Whitney, Intel 810 Chipset - Part II
- Whitney, Intel's 810 Chipset - Part I
- Motherboard Guide
- 440BX Motherboard Review - Fall 1998
- Slot 1 Chipset Comparison
- Socket 7 Board Review July 1998
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: intel, i820, chipset, review
Topics: Business, INTEL
Syndication:
Game Application Performance - AGP
We've already speculated that the i820's AGP 4x wasn't going to yield a huge performance gain in today's games. I've included results using Expendable Demo, Quake 3 Arena Test and Shogo. Each of these games was run at a resolution of 640x480x16. I used the lower resolution to keep the video board from being the bottleneck.

In Expendable the i820 has a minuscule lead over the i440BX platform. The VIA platform is over 8FPS slower the i440BX. This proves once more that VIA's AGP-implementation is still not up to speed with Intel's.

Under Quake 3 the i820 and i440BX run a tight race. The VIA platform stills holds a steady last place.

Nothing has really changed even with the Shogo results. Both the i440BX and i820 platforms perform almost identically. The VIA based system still tries to play catch up. Could the VIA board's performance be limited by their AGP implementation?
- Previous page Business Application Performance -...
- Next page AGP 4X Performance