Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Getting To Know Internet Explorer Again

Web Browser Grand Prix 3: IE9 Enters The Race
By

It's been a while since I've used Internet Explorer for any significant amount of time (a dozen years, to be exact). I switched from Netscape to IE for version 3, and then to Firefox at version 6. Internet Explorer simply wasn't an option in the past few years because I've been using Linux. Naturally, much of Microsoft's newest browser is consequently new to me. So, let's get to know Internet Explorer again.

Brand New User Interface

The default user interface layout of Internet Explorer 9 follows the recent minimalist trend begun by Chrome. Also like Chrome, the IE9 address bar and search bar have become one. The one bar handles searches through Bing (by default), as well as URLs.

UI staples like the menu bar, status bar, and even the title bar are absent. So are the favorites bar and toolbar. In order to save even more space, the tab bar is on the same row as the one bar. Below are side-by-side screenshots of IE8 and IE9 in their default views.

IE8IE8IE9IE9

Users who prefer the older UI layout have the option to change it substantially. The tab bar can be to moved to its own row below the one bar. You can also bring back the status bar at the bottom of the window. So too can the menu bar be restored below the tab or one bar. Finally, a toolbar/favorites bar can be added below the menu, tab, or one bar. Altogether, these changes make IE9 look a whole lot like IE8, sans the search bar, and tabs a few rows higher.

IE9 With Tab RowIE9 With Tab RowIE9 Full ViewIE9 Full View

Pinning Sites

Web sites can now be pinned to the taskbar, just like applications. To pin a site, simply drag a tab to the taskbar. The favicon of the site becomes the icon used in the taskbar. Launching the pinned site opens a separate Internet Explorer window. The blue elements in the UI even take on the primary color of the favicon to distinguish pinned sites.

As you can see in the screenshot above, pinning Bing to the Windows 7 task bar creates a custom Bing IE9 window. Unfortunately for Vista users, this feature is exclusive to Windows 7.

Pinning individual sites may be the intended purpose of this feature. However, up to seven other sites can be added to the pinned shortcut. Essentially, each pinned site is an instance of IE with its own home settings. The pinned site is the home page, but in Internet Explorer there is also something called home page tab groups.

Right-click on the favicon of the pinned site while in another tab and select Add as home page. Unfortunately, like IE8 before it, IE9 is restricted to a maximum of eight home tabs.

Even with this limitation, IE9 provides baked-in tab management, and that's a plus. This feature is useful of grouping tabs together for specific tasks, or its intended purpose of simply pinning favorite Web sites to the taskbar for quick access.

Compatibility 180

With Internet Explorer 9, Microsoft is reversing its previous stance on standards. Compliance with upcoming open Web standards, such as HTML5 and CSS3, are front-and-center in the development of IE9. Later on, we'll take a look at how well the company did in our section on compliance testing. I did, however, notice that my own blog now functions properly in the world's most widely-used Web browser. Below is a screenshot of my home page displayed in IE8 juxtaposed next to IE9.

Obviously, the IE9 image (on the right) is how it should be displayed, which is how it's displayed in nearly every other Web browser still in active development. A lot of time goes into making IE6-IE8 work acceptably. Web developers, let loose a collective "Hooray"!

Speed

Microsoft also made performance a top priority during the development of Internet Explorer 9. The brand new Chakra JavaScript engine promises dramatic improvements over IE8. When Microsoft released the IE9 platform preview, it smoked a lot of the benchmarks. But the platform preview was pre-alpha with absolutely no features enabled (not even back/forward). Just how much of that performance translates to a fully-functioning Web browser remains to be seen.

Enough talk. Let's see if Microsoft Internet Explorer 9 can walk the walk. On to the benchmarks!

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 244 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 20 Hide
    andy5174 , March 21, 2011 4:25 AM
    Will there be a " Web Browser Grand Prix 4: Firefox 4 Enters The Race " after Firefox 4's release (22 Mar)?
  • 19 Hide
    turboflame , March 21, 2011 4:34 AM
    I like how this article was released one day before Firefox 4 is released.
Other Comments
  • 3 Hide
    pirateboy , March 21, 2011 4:17 AM
    I wonder how much microsoft paid tomshardware not to include Firefox 4 RC1
  • 1 Hide
    cruiseoveride , March 21, 2011 4:18 AM
    Now everyone is going to switch from Chrome to IE?
  • 0 Hide
    bison88 , March 21, 2011 4:18 AM
    Nice comparison Adam. I think people don't give MS credit for IE9 because of their history with web standards and lack of competition with updating their browser since they destroyed Netscape so many years ago. Hopefully they have their head in the game and continue with a somewhat constant update cycle. Currently the transition from IE8 to IE9 was somewhat FireFox'ish with speed instead of waiting for another revision of the OS. The browser definitely surprised me, some quirks here and there that are definitely noticeable and the Chrome/FF influence is obviously present. I wish them luck as the competition heats up.
  • 20 Hide
    andy5174 , March 21, 2011 4:25 AM
    Will there be a " Web Browser Grand Prix 4: Firefox 4 Enters The Race " after Firefox 4's release (22 Mar)?
  • 1 Hide
    illuminatuz , March 21, 2011 4:28 AM
    i felt the speed once i switched from firefox to chrome and now chrome to IE..
    but there is no mention of any addon/extentions for IE..
    i mean there is no comparision on who's got nice addons and startup time "with" addons.. since users tend to use web browsers with addons knowingly or un-knowingly..
    it would be better if you include those two comparisions as well.. and who takes advantage of GPU and all..
  • -2 Hide
    winner4455 , March 21, 2011 4:29 AM
    Won't take that long for IE to lag behind.
  • 1 Hide
    illuminatuz , March 21, 2011 4:33 AM
    winner4455Won't take that long for IE to lag behind.

    lol
    maybe not!!
    and FFS why doesnt that "submit my comment" button not working in IE!! I am using chrome for that ;(
  • 19 Hide
    turboflame , March 21, 2011 4:34 AM
    I like how this article was released one day before Firefox 4 is released.
  • 7 Hide
    dimamu15 , March 21, 2011 4:37 AM
    duck it, i stick to firefox.
  • 1 Hide
    Scanlia , March 21, 2011 4:38 AM
    Is there a wrong picture on the efficiency page? The 40tabs graph comes up as GUIMark 2?
  • 1 Hide
    IzzyCraft , March 21, 2011 4:38 AM
    The 40 Tabs chart is wrong for Efficiency Benchmarks: Memory Usage And Management it shows flash vector charting.

    pirateboyI wonder how much microsoft paid tomshardware not to include Firefox 4 RC1

    Then they would have to include every random nightly build of every browser? Comparing the latest release is fair you'll always get one browser or two that is near a new stable version but that's just how it works.

    winner4455Won't take that long for IE to lag behind.

    depends in Microsoft moves up an update schedule that doesn't just include making the browser more secure and fixing bugs. IE8 was pretty snappy back when it was first out it got old in like 3 months compared to other browsers though.
  • 0 Hide
    adamovera , March 21, 2011 4:43 AM
    pirateboyI wonder how much microsoft paid tomshardware not to include Firefox 4 RC1

    We only test final products in the WBGP.
    andy5174Will there be a " Web Browser Grand Prix 4: Firefox 4 Enters The Race " after Firefox 4's release (22 Mar)?

    turboflameI like how this article was released one day before Firefox 4 is released.

    Where are ya'll getting a set date from?
    illuminatuzi felt the speed once i switched from firefox to chrome and now chrome to IE..but there is no mention of any addon/extentions for IE.. i mean there is no comparision on who's got nice addons and startup time "with" addons.. since users tend to use web browsers with addons knowingly or un-knowingly..it would be better if you include those two comparisions as well.. and who takes advantage of GPU and all..

    We add/modify tests every time with the WBGP. We're already looking into those suggestions.
    ScanliaIs there a wrong picture on the efficiency page? The 40tabs graph comes up as GUIMark 2?

    Doh! Fixing that now.
  • 3 Hide
    andy5174 , March 21, 2011 4:51 AM
    Quote:
    Where are ya'll getting a set date from?


    http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.planning/browse_thread/thread/d7cd3c9e9650b1b3
  • -2 Hide
    molo9000 , March 21, 2011 4:53 AM
    Wait a second. Did they really include Safari? Who uses Safari for Windows?
    (I'm assuming they tested the Windows version of Safari, because why would you compare browsers for different systems?)

    I'm sticking with Opera on my Windows machine and Safari on my Mac.
  • 4 Hide
    Benihana , March 21, 2011 4:54 AM
    To be honest I did not read this article, because you're using the "latest and greatest" browsers, but somehow jumped a day early and didn't wait for FF4. Maybe you mentioned it in the article, but if not, then was it really so bad to wait an additional 1-2 days to do this?
  • 0 Hide
    DjEaZy , March 21, 2011 4:58 AM
    ... don't know... but this all is not my experience... why there is no firefox 4.0 RC2 ????
  • 0 Hide
    jezzarisky , March 21, 2011 5:01 AM
    adamoveraWhere are ya'll getting a set date from?



    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/16/mozilla_ship_firefox_4_22_march/

    Although most websites link to this website, so perhaps it was nothing more than a rumor.
  • 0 Hide
    andy5174 , March 21, 2011 5:11 AM
    Quote:
    Wait a second. Did they really include Safari? Who uses Safari for Windows?
    (I'm assuming they tested the Windows version of Safari, because why would you compare browsers for different systems?)

    I'm sticking with Opera on my Windows machine and Safari on my Mac.

    Opera sucks balls in memory management and lacks handy add-on such as Tab Mix Plus (which is same for Chrome). I would definitely move to Opera if it has these 2 issues fixed.
  • 0 Hide
    luc2k , March 21, 2011 5:12 AM
    https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/4/Beta

    This article looks like a case of premature e.. something.
  • -3 Hide
    adamovera , March 21, 2011 5:12 AM
    andy5174http://groups.google.com/group/moz [...] 9e9650b1b3

    On the 16th he said RC1 would become the final code on the 22nd, but they released an RC2 since. I don't believe them anymore. Where is an official announcement or press release? RC1 was supposed to be here in November 2010. WBGP3 was going to feature FF4 at the end of 2010, then again at the end of this Feb. IE9 gave a date, so WBGP3 was made to coincide with its release. IF Firefox 4 launches tomorrow, it's purely coincidental. We stopped holding the WBGP series up for FF4 when MS officially gave their IE9 release date.
Display more comments