How Well Will Mass Effect 3 Run On Your PC?

Minimum Detail (No Dynamic Shadows, No AA)

Minimum detail means we turn off dynamic shadows and in-game AA. If you own an entry-level discrete card, you'll probably want to think about running Mass Effect 3 at 1024x768.

The Radeon HD 6450 is able to deliver more than a 30 FPS minimum, but the GeForce G210 DDR2 struggles. To be fair, you could buy a DDR3-equipped GeForce G210 for about the same price as the Radeon HD 6450. But based on these results, we wouldn’t expect it yield playable performance.

The GeForce GT 440 DDR3 and Radeon HD 6670 DDR3 have no problem here, so let's increase the resolution to 1280x1024:

AMD's Radeon HD 6450 and Nvidia's GeForce GT 210 spend significant time under 30 FPS, knocking them out of the running. But the GeForce GT 440 DDR3 and Radeon HD 6670 DDR3 manage continue pushing playable numbers.

At 1680x1050, the GeForce GT 440 DDR3 and Radeon HD 6670 DDR3 almost manage a 30 FPS minimum frame rate. However, as the frame rate over time chart shows, both cards rarely dip under 30 FPS at all.

You might be able to find a GeForce GT 440 GDDR5 for about the same price as the AMD card, and its faster memory would likely make a quantifiable performance difference. Unfortunately, we only have the DDR3-based model of the GeForce available for testing.

At 1080p, the GeForce GT 440 and Radeon HD 6670 are no longer playable. We snuck in the GeForce GTX 550 Ti and Radeon HD 6770, though, and those cards do very well. Our next step is to increase the graphical load.

Create a new thread in the US Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
110 comments
    Your comment
    Top Comments
  • shin0bi272
    So wait this console based game thats running on the unreal 3 engine plays well on a pc with a quad core and even a moderately good graphics card? Im shocked!

    Dont get me wrong though Im still excited to play it... just not expecting it to be graphically demanding.
    23
  • Sud099
    why the hell they don't initially develop games for PC and then port to consoles like Battlefield 3
    23
  • rmpumper
    I really hope that the highest setting in ME3 demo are like med-high in the full game.
    20
  • Other Comments
  • slicedtoad
    I'm hoping the full game has more customization. Either way, it'll be fun.
    18
  • shriganesh
    Why the hell article like these don't appear in the RSS feeds!!!
    -14
  • bak0n
    I'd be really shocked if there are many people out there running Intel 2500k's with geforce 220's or radeon 6450's.
    17
  • bartholomew
    Can't wait to get this game. :D
    6
  • mildsend
    I have phenom x4 9550 with 9800gt can i run this game at moderat setting at 1366x768 resolutions ?
    -11
  • rmpumper
    I really hope that the highest setting in ME3 demo are like med-high in the full game.
    20
  • shin0bi272
    So wait this console based game thats running on the unreal 3 engine plays well on a pc with a quad core and even a moderately good graphics card? Im shocked!

    Dont get me wrong though Im still excited to play it... just not expecting it to be graphically demanding.
    23
  • spp85
    Radeon HD 5770/6770 still Rockzzz.........
    9
  • spp85
    Quote:
    I have phenom x4 9550 with 9800gt can i run this game at moderat setting at 1366x768 resolutions ?

    You can play medium to high settings on that resolution
    7
  • Sud099
    why the hell they don't initially develop games for PC and then port to consoles like Battlefield 3
    23
  • Th-z
    For anyone who's familiar with ME lore, is the method how reaper ships attack earth surprised to you?

    To me it's more like Hollywood cliche than true ME lore, at least from the ideas of ME1. Despite the problem, I'm still interested in the game, because the story, characters, acting, and cinematography are still one of the best in video games.
    7
  • LongpastPNR
    Th-zFor anyone who's familiar with ME lore, is the method how reaper ships attack earth surprised to you? To me it's more like Hollywood cliche than true ME lore, at least from the ideas of ME1. Despite the problem, I'm still interested in the game, because the story, characters, acting, and cinematography are still one of the best in video games.That's not how a hyper advanced machine race wipeout an organicaccording to the ME loreNot a game to showcase graphical , but the acting, character, and story, theThe game won't support game pad, not that I want to play with a pad personally, but it's hard to imagine a game came out in 2012 and a big stud io doesn't support it. while small indie studios can provide multiple control scheme.

    ME1 was Great ! ME2 was a big big let down and ME3 will be far to hollywood and dumbed down beacuse of the Mcdonalds and Facebook gen sad really.
    7
  • Anonymous
    There are a few other settings but they are not in the game. You have to use the configuration tool that's in the "Binaries" folder in the game's folder. Not sure if there is a shortcut to this tool somewhere (right-click on the game in Origin?)
    Most of these settings are at the max value by default though, so it's mostly useful for low-end machines, to disable additional eye-candy. One exception is Anisotropic Filtering which seems to be disabled by default (not sure).
    0
  • Duzzi
    2 x Radeon HD 6850 1 GB GDDR5 in SLI (page 2 Test System And Benchmarks)... or maybe it was crossfire? :D
    4
  • badtaylorx
    this does not bode well for the game.....they're not pushing the envelope...they're PULLING it!!!
    2
  • Onus
    As many comments as there were about what a GT440 with GDDR5 might do, I can't help but wonder about a HD6670 with GDDR5; how much better it might have been.
    Another one is the HD7750. If similar to the HD6770, it looks like it would handle this game pretty well.

    I really like the FPS over time chart you are now using in these reviews.

    Unfortunately, as good as it looks (especially with the multiple ways to play), if Origin is a requirement, it appears to be a "pass."

    And, I'll bet there are LOTS of people with an i5-2500K and a HD6450; professionals who needed the CPU horsepower and added the GPU for movies or to add monitors (e.g. developers who aren't [yet] gamers, and Wall Street gamblers using multiple screens).
    -1
  • amk-aka-Phantom
    1) Whoever complains about the Reapers attacking Earth like they do instead of orbital bombardment - don't forget they want to HARVEST the humans, not just kill them. That much was made clear in ME2.

    2) Yeah, graphics are not such a big improvement... I'm still outraged with low resolution armor textures. Faces are made really well (ESPECIALLY Wrex's face! So high-detailed!), but bodies...

    3) Multiplayer is FUN as hell. I recommend.

    4) Origin is easy to use, doesn't slow down your PC like some idiots claim and makes inviting people to multiplayer very easy. I like it. As far as "spying" goes, to hell with paranoia, all my info that I don't want to share on teh internets is simply not on my computer :P

    6) My country gets N7 Collectors' Edition at half the price :kaola: Great DLC "From Ashes" (DO NOT LOOK IT UP, major spoilers!) is included for free, as well as a bunch of extra weapons.

    7) Mass Effect 3: Playable On A Wide Range Of Hardware

    Mass Effect 3: made by BioWare's worst console/Apple fanboys team (Casey Hudson, Mac Walters, Preston Watamaniuk, Chris Priestly, etc.) who can't understand PC gaming for $h!t. Fixed...

    ...And I still love the series; it's that good.
    10
  • Murissokah
    Graphics are not the main issue with console ports. PC's will play at much higher resolution an can force filters such as supersampling that will make a wolrd of difference over the crappy console graphics.

    The controls and level design are what really suffer in the process. Things like Skyrim's quick list (troublesome and completely unnecessary when you have a keyboard) really take away from the experience. It also hurts to see a game such as crysis, which had a beatiful and believable enviroment get limited by the console's rendering capacity and turn into a much inferior level design that keeps the player confined in small areas. I hope we don't get that treatment again.
    11
  • Anonymous
    I Give up!!!!

    This has shown me whatI have been thinking for a while now, how pants AMD performance really is....

    a 2500k, literally CRAPS all over my Phenom x6 @ 4GHZ

    Screw it, moving to intel i7 2600k, refuse to play AMD any more....

    Anyone want a x6 and Asus Crosshairs iv, going for a steal!
    -4
  • bucknutty
    LongPastPNRME1 was Great ! ME2 was a big big let down and ME3 will be far to hollywood and dumbed down beacuse of the Mcdonalds and Facebook gen sad really.

    I agree ME1 had a great story, ME2 had no story other than find some guy, or girl to help you, then help do some thing so he is loyal to you. Its like 40 hours of character development and 8 hours of story.
    4