Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Benchmark System

Radeon HD 7990 And GeForce GTX 690: Bring Out The Big Guns
By

We first benchmarked all the graphics cards in our VGA 2012 benchmark system. After that, we took a look at installation and operation in a closed case.

Benchmark System
CPU
Intel Core i7-2600K (Sandy Bridge), 32 nm, 4C/8T, 8 MB Shared L3 Cache, Hyper-Threading Enabled, Overclocked to 4.5 GHz
Motherboard
Gigabyte Z68X-UD7-B3, Intel Z68 Express, BIOS F10
Memory
4 x 4 GB Kingston HyperX DDR3-1600
CPU Cooler
Cooler Master TPC 800 with Noiseblocker eLoop B12-PS (PWM)
SSD
Kingston V200+ 480 GB
Power Supply
Corsair AX1200i Digital ATX Power Supply, 1200 W, 80 PLUS Platinum
Operating System
Windows 7 x64 Ultimate
Driver Catalyst 12.11 (Beta) and Catalyst 12.9        
GeForce 306.97 WHQL
Temperature
22 °C (held constant)
Closed Benchmark Case
NZXT Phantom 820


We're particularly interested to compare the performance of AMD's Catalyst 12.9 driver package to the more recently-released 12.11 beta driver, which the company claims should be much faster in a number of games.

Unlike many of the graphics card reviews you read, we're conducting our testing today in a closed chassis. After all, it can't be that easy to dissipate more than 500 W worth of heat, and we want to know what effect that has on real-world thermals and acoustics.

Display all 143 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 25 Hide
    twinshadow , November 8, 2012 8:47 AM
    if you are spending 1000$ dollars on a video card paying a Power bill is not an issue
  • 24 Hide
    abbadon_34 , November 8, 2012 7:57 AM
    wow, microstuttering is a now a non issue , at least AMD
  • 21 Hide
    Anonymous , November 8, 2012 6:43 AM
    thanks for the in depth analysis with adaptive V-sync and radeon pro helping with micro stutter.

    not to take away anything for the hard work performed; i would have liked have seen nvidia's latest beta driver, 310.33, included also to see if nvidia is doing anything to improve the performance of their card instead of just adding 3d vision, AO, and sli profiles.
Other Comments
  • 7 Hide
    mayankleoboy1 , November 8, 2012 5:40 AM
    IMHO, the GTX690 looks best. There is something really alluring about shiny white metallic shine and the fine metal mesh. Along with the fluorescent green branding.
    Maybe i am too much of a retro SF buff :) 
  • 12 Hide
    tacoslave , November 8, 2012 6:03 AM
    i wept
  • 18 Hide
    hellfire24 , November 8, 2012 6:04 AM
    your test system is sexy!!!!!!!
  • 20 Hide
    willyroc , November 8, 2012 6:05 AM
    You can't really go wrong either way with these generally insane(so to speak) cards.
  • -7 Hide
    amuffin , November 8, 2012 6:34 AM
    Is it just me or do the 7970X2 and 7990 coolers look so fast and fugly? :heink: 
  • 21 Hide
    Anonymous , November 8, 2012 6:43 AM
    thanks for the in depth analysis with adaptive V-sync and radeon pro helping with micro stutter.

    not to take away anything for the hard work performed; i would have liked have seen nvidia's latest beta driver, 310.33, included also to see if nvidia is doing anything to improve the performance of their card instead of just adding 3d vision, AO, and sli profiles.
  • 18 Hide
    esrever , November 8, 2012 6:45 AM
    can we get some quadfire benchmarks too? :D 
  • -6 Hide
    RazorBurn , November 8, 2012 6:55 AM
    AMD's Dual GPU at 500+ Watts of electricity is out for me.. Too Much Power and Noise..
  • 7 Hide
    mohit9206 , November 8, 2012 6:56 AM
    2 670's in sli is better than spending on a 690 and 2 7950's in Xfire is better than spending on a 7990. this way you save nearly $300 both ways
  • 24 Hide
    abbadon_34 , November 8, 2012 7:57 AM
    wow, microstuttering is a now a non issue , at least AMD
  • 10 Hide
    ojas , November 8, 2012 8:02 AM
    Good read!

    But, would have liked to see 680s in SLI, to see how they scale now compared to the 690.

    Also, would using two single GPUs in CF/SLI make a difference to the micro-stuttering charts? iirc, the PCIe controller is tied to the CPU for SB/IB chips? So that would mean no 3rd party bridge in between the two GPUs as in the case of the 7990 and 690. Would that make a diff?

    How do you manage to isolate the cards' power consumption at load (idle is simpler)? And noise too: how do you block out the case fans and CPU cooler?
  • 1 Hide
    Anonymous , November 8, 2012 8:07 AM
    The radeon pro is saving AMD's butt

    But In the end, 690 was slower than 7990 average framerate but with Radeon Pro, it is the 7990 which is slower right?

    So yes it's better than without, but the 690 is faster, as smooth, and use a built in technology

    AMD really need to work on it's crossfire technology
  • 12 Hide
    blazorthon , November 8, 2012 8:08 AM
    amuffinIs it just me or do the 7970X2 and 7990 coolers look so fast and fugly?


    I don't think they look "fast and ugly", although I do think that the HIS model could do with some more finesse.
  • 10 Hide
    FormatC , November 8, 2012 8:17 AM
    Quote:
    How do you manage to isolate the cards' power consumption at load (idle is simpler)? And noise too: how do you block out the case fans and CPU cooler?
    The noise was measured with the open benchtable, not in case (no extra case fans and an ultra silent fan on the hidden CPU cooler)

    For the power consumption: 3 current clamps with monitoring ;) 
  • 17 Hide
    Novuake , November 8, 2012 8:42 AM
    Interesting, AMD has a winner at the top tier! That hasn't happened in a while. CODOS to that.
  • 25 Hide
    twinshadow , November 8, 2012 8:47 AM
    if you are spending 1000$ dollars on a video card paying a Power bill is not an issue
  • 6 Hide
    blazorthon , November 8, 2012 8:47 AM
    NovuakeInteresting, AMD has a winner at the top tier! That hasn't happened in a while. CODOS to that.


    Technically, HIS has a winner, not AMD because AMD didn't launch a 7990/7970X2 reference;)
  • -5 Hide
    blazorthon , November 8, 2012 8:54 AM
    twinshadowif you are spending 1000$ dollars on a video card paying a Power bill is not an issue


    Actually, the only person who I ever recommended a GTX 690 to wanted it specifically because of its low power consumption literally being enough to pay for itself compared to his previous graphics setup due to his high cost for power. Some people looking for such high end cards most certainly do care about power consumption.
  • 18 Hide
    FormatC , November 8, 2012 8:56 AM
    1 kW/h in Germany: 0.25 Euro (approx. 0.34 USD)
    This IS an issue. ;) 
Display more comments