Next-Gen 3D Rendering Technology: Voxel Ray Casting

Conclusion

Real-time 3D rendering is in a particularly exciting phase of its evolution. With the arrival of GPUs that are more and more programmable, a lot of approaches that have been out of the question up until now are reappearing, as developers try to solve the problems at hand. 

Voxel octree ray casting is an especially promising technique for drastically increasing the geometric complexity of the games of the future. Obviously, it’s all still in the experimental stage, and Olick's demonstration at SIGGRAPH is more of a feasibility demonstration than anything else. A lot of questions remain unanswered.

One of those questions, which will be decisive for the future of the technology, has to do with the editing tools with which graphic artists will have to work. Olick says he expects an evolution of the system currently used for MegaTextures, which lets artists apply buffers to add details to a texture. Such a system, instead of modifying the normal map, would directly modify the geometry with this technology. But for now, everything is still in the conceptual stage and as we know, making nice demos is far from being the hardest part. They then have to be turned into a finished product that’s sufficiently stable and efficient.

Still, it’s very interesting to see a model animated using several million polygons (seven million in the initial model, done with ZBrush) at 60 frames per second on a present-generation card. These early results are extremely promising when you think about the hardware that will be available by the time games that actually use the technology hit the market. Given the development times for games nowadays, and considering how id Software doesn’t plan to release Rage before next year, we’d probably have to wait three or four years before this type of rendering hits retail shelves.

Create a new thread in the US Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
47 comments
    Your comment
  • DjEaZy
    ... the 'matrix' is near... by this rate of progress...
    4
  • doomtomb
    This stuff is pretty interesting but a little over my head. The only thing I really care about is when we will start seeing this in our games.
    3
  • curnel_D
    This technology sounds a TON more promising than Ray tracing.
    2
  • the_krasno
    This is awesome, the people that can really gain something here are amateur filmmakers that can't afford the giant rendering farms big studios have! :)
    2
  • the_krasno
    the_krasnoThis is awesome, the people that can really gain something here are amateur filmmakers that can't afford the giant rendering farms big studios have!

    I meant independent, not amateur. Sorry.
    0
  • Anonymous
    personally i like raytracing, except for the performance issues. if you've ever tried doing a little 3d rendering, ray tracing is very good, makes things look very real if done properly. again i know it is slow
    1
  • liquidsnake718
    Very interesting stuff, I do understand how limiting cubes or voxels can be limited in terms of depth and height(same height per distance) as polygons have that advantage where the triangle gives us just that, an angle that can be measured in terms of height and distanve. We have a vanishing point with a triangle as well.....

    Iwonder if they can impliment both polygons and advanced cubes with different sizes for the initial layers creating a more fluid and complexed scenario or landscape........
    -2
  • JonathanDeane
    Interesting but voxels will have some extreme performance and space constraint hurdles to overcome before they become the main rendering of any game. I just downloaded a small demo http://www.advsys.net/ken/voxlap/voxlap03.htm its a little over 500K for the whole works but after you hit the genall batch file (it speeds up loading) the thing occupies about 120MB's of space for this simple game. Something like Quake 3 would have been a multi DVD file...
    0
  • mlopinto2k1
    Pretty cool stuff.
    -2
  • amdfangirl
    Better put off upgrading my computer... again :P
    -2
  • Anonymous
    In the regular resolution 12x12 you get 144 cells instead of 122 as stated in the text
    -2
  • fatedtodie
    Based on John Carmack's record if he says it is bad... you should do it, seeing as anyone with a memory will recall the time he said multi-core was a waste of time and we should continue the Ghz race (even those the Ghz race achieved Moore's Law).

    John Carmack is a dinosaur and will try any new technology if paid enough (see his changing his mind on multi-core to "help" on the xbox 360).

    Please get an expert that isn't a moron.
    -5
  • bin1127
    “pixel” is a fusion of the terms “picture” and “element,”, learned something new.

    But i wouldn't want destructible walls. How am i going to camp when all the walls are gone?
    -3
  • manwell999
    Since when does a tree have attached children?
    It's unfortunate that the example of MRI scan example was used. Medical software must avoid the habit of naming branches in tree structures as children, lest an error message is displayed accidentally to a patient such as "Out of memory allocating children, child process aborted." Which would be a lawsuit if scanning a pregnant female. But this bad coding practice is quite common.
    -4
  • zak_mckraken
    @manwell999 : lawl
    -8
  • JimmiG
    fatedtodieanyone with a memory will recall the time he said multi-core was a waste of time and we should continue the Ghz race


    Well, back in the day, everyone was talking about higher GHz as the solution to everything. Even Intel did:
    http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1026758/desktop-chips-hit-15ghz-2010
    "LUCKY PUNTERS WILL BE ABLE TO BUY 15GHZ INTEL CHIPS, containing a billion transistors, by the end of the decade, said Pat Gelsinger, Intel veep and CTO in his keynote at the Intel Developer Forum in Tokyo today. Gelsinger also predicted that PDAs will hit 5GHz in the same timeframe. It's unlikely the chips will use the existing Pentium 4 architecture which is reckoned to only be good up to around 10GHz. "

    Then Intel hit the thermal/power wall some time in 2004-2005, before even making it to 4 GHz. This of course signaled the end of such optimism. If that hadn't happened, higher clock speeds would still have been the best way to make faster CPUs. That makes all code run faster, not just code that is carefully optimized to extract parallelism. Multi-core CPUs for desktops and laptops initially came around not because it was the best choice for improving performance, but because it was not possible to further increase clock speed.
    1
  • precariousgray
    Here's what I saw.

    That example should give you an intuitive idea of one of the advantages of using trees.
    -1
  • kikireeki
    What happened to Normal Mapping?
    -1
  • JonathanDeane
    kikireekiWhat happened to Normal Mapping?


    Hmmm maybe using a skin of voxels on top of a polygon mesh would be good for facial animation stuff, that sounds interesting to me or a mesh of polygons on top of the voxels for deformation purposes. Ok my mind is officially fried you may all proceed to LOL at me :)
    -1
  • spiketheaardvark
    I wish the article discussed how such a system would handle transparent objects and refracted light sources , such as an image of a glass of water.
    0