All about Motherboards
 Latest Motherboards articles
All Motherboards articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

crazy : Interactive Boogy Pick one of the 3 songs, hit on the correct keys matching this boy's dance moves.
violent : Interactive Buddy Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
Ads

Sponsored links

Software and Accessories

Previous Next
10:50 AM - 06/10/2008 by Thomas Soderstrom

ASRock has a slightly different version of its OC Tuner application for each motherboard. Features for the X48TurboTwins-WiFi include system health and hardware monitors plus overclocking and voltage controls.

x48 motherboard comparison

The System Health monitor also includes an adjustment for automatic CPU fan speed control.

x48 motherboard comparison

CPU speed detection shows power savings settings in action, when enabled.

x48 motherboard comparison

ASRock’s overclocking utility provides FSB, PCIe and CPU multiplier adjustments on one menu and voltage control on another.

x48 motherboard comparison

In addition to its own overclocking utility, ASRock includes McAfee Virus Scan on its installation CD.

Accessories
Documentation & Software Motherboard Manual
Motherboard Driver CD
Hardware 1x 80-conductor Ultra ATA cable
1x Floppy Cable
4x SATA Data Cable
1x WiFi Antenna
1x 4-pin to SATA power adapter
1x WiFi Card (Internal Mini USB)
1x Slot Cover for WiFi antenna hole
1x S/P-DIF out to HDMI pass-through cable
1x I/O Panel Shield

The X48TurboTwins-WiFi includes only four SATA data cables, which will get used up quickly by anyone looking to enable the rear panel “eSATA” connectors via internal bridging. On the other hand, ASRock is the only brand we know of to include a cable for connecting the motherboard’s internal S/P-DIF output to a graphics card, which adds HDMI audio capability to certain GeForce models.

x48 motherboard comparison

Talkback
nihility 05/31/2008 10:23 AM
Hide
-5+

I thought the major concern with overclocking was doing it with 4 GB or 8 GB of memory installed and with quad cores.
Buying an overly expensive high end motherboard but installing a 65 nm dual core processor and just 2 GB of RAM seems a very odd combination to me.

Anonymous 05/31/2008 6:10 PM
Hide
-0+

@ni

Not so odd if you want to get the base foundation set up and then wait for lower prices on higher performance parts later on down the road.
A quad core (3.0 GHz x 4) chip is coming down the pike by years end and DDR3 prices are on the slide. Building an E8400 / 2 GB base machine is exactly what I did to finally migrate from my 5 year old P4 Extreme Edition / Intel 875 based rig.

That's the beauty of the X48 platform; longevity.

Anonymous 06/01/2008 12:45 PM
Hide
-0+

The ECS offering has supposedly been out for around a month, but I can't find it for sale ANYWHERE!! can't even find a price. I used to turn my nose up at ECS products. Our company used Asus boards exclusively thinking they were a higher quality product. Evey one of our Asus boards failed within 4 years. This may be because the Chinese have studied the American business model... Make a product that is designed to either fail or need parts within a calculated period of time. ECS are much cheaper, and so far seem more stable than the Maximus Formula board we purchased recently. The Asus BIOS is for people who like to toy with settings. Unfortunately their BIOS has become complicated beyond their programmers ability too write stable code.

Anonymous 06/01/2008 6:09 AM
Hide
-1+

Glad to see that gigabyte's board was so much more energy efficient than Asus', or any other board for that matter... especially while overclocking

Fedor 06/01/2008 9:53 AM
Hide
-0+

Arcolyte - lol. Did you fall asleep and dream up another page of the review which had power consumption whilst overclocking? :p

For the record I'm using my first Gigabyte board (X38-DQ6) and overall I'm pretty happy with it, but having said that I haven't used Asus in at least 5 years. With these comparisons it often comes down to features since performance is pretty near (although the low memory speeds achieved by the Gigabyte surprised me!).

Anonymous 06/01/2008 5:19 PM
Hide
-0+

" Intel covers all of its CPU VRM MOSFET?s with sinks. Our apologies for the alphabet soup that made up the last comment. " -> You could've gone with " Central Processing Unit Voltage Regulator Module Metal?Oxide?Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistor's " , so it's ok =)

frodbonzi 06/02/2008 5:01 AM
Hide
-0+

I wonder how the Asus' Rampage Formula stacks up here? It supports DDR2 or DDR3 and is part of the RoG line... X48 as well...

xanxaz 06/02/2008 10:00 PM
Hide
-0+

asrock rocks....lol...although i'll keep my gigabyte... as i dont know where to say this, it's better say it here... your main page is eating my cpu cycles... between 25% up to 50% cpu utilization while viewing your site? please cut down in animated ads... running a c2d at 3.6 and still lags while surfing... dah... it's just your site... os is it me? i think it's the ad on the top right corner that is causing that...

wozeus 06/16/2008 7:54 PM
Hide
-0+

I see that Newegg has ECS X48T-A for under $200. Looks like it's a great deal...going to get one.

Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links