Modded M3 MacBook Air outperforms the more expensive M3 MacBook Pro — supercharged cooling solution delivers big performance

SVALT Cooling Dock DHCR
(Image credit: SVALT)

It's no secret that Apple's speedy M3 Macbook Air runs hot, even hitting 114 degrees Celcius, which results in heavy performance throttling. However, YouTuber MaxTech discovered that the Macbook Air's performance problems can be easily remedied with just a couple of modifications (albeit expensive ones). By utilizing a DHCR cooling dock from SVALT in conjunction with thermal pads, MaxTech improved the M3 Macbook Air's performance by nearly 50% in select circumstances and outperformed the more premium (and much cooler) M3 Macbook Pro.

The DHCR cooling dock is a multi-purpose device explicitly designed to hold and cool a Macbook simultaneously. It features a "direct heatsink coupling" that has the laptop vertically. At the same time, the lid is closed and maintains surface contact around the bottom area of the computer where the M3 chip is located. The dock's cooling system functions by cooling the outer chassis, which keeps the M3 chip cool inside.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
3D Mark Wildlife Extreme
DeviceConfigurationScoreBenchmark
M3 Macbook AirStock8,083 pointsOne Run
M3 Macbook AirStock5,916 points20 minute stress test
M3 Macbook AirClamshell Mode4,198 points20 minute stress test
M3 Macbook Air Clamshell Mode w/ SVALT Cooling Dock7,309 points20 minute stress test
M3 Macbook AirClamshell Mode w/ Thermal Pads and SVALT Cooling Dock8,062 points20 minute stress test
M3 Macbook ProStock8,090 pointsOne Run
M3 Macbook ProStock7,933 points20 minute stress test

Max Tech found that the SVALT cooling dock can substantially increase sustained performance. In 3DMark Wildlife, the dock almost doubled the Macbook Air's performance, from 4,198 points in clamshell mode (lid closed) to 7,309 points, just 800 points shy of what the M3 MacBook Air can do in the same benchmark when not heat soaked. It is also roughly 600 points shy of the M3 MacBook Pro.

To get the M3 Macbook Air to Macbook Pro performance, Max Techsed a pair of thermal pads placed in between the M3's internal cooling solution and outer shell to boost performance. With these two modifications working together, Max Tech achieved 8,062 points of sustained performance, beating the MacBook Pro in the same test conditions by roughly 100 points.

Max Tech's discovery demonstrates how different the MacBook Air's cooling solution is from that of the MacBook Pro. Although both laptops share identical specifications, including the same M3 chip, the MacBook Air's fanless-cooling solution results in substantially lower sustained performance.

The good news is that users can modify their M3 Macbook Airs to get around this problem, as Max Tech has demonstrated. Even if you went with just the thermal pads, the M3 MacBook Air gains back most of its sustained performance loss. But SVALT's DHCR cooling dock is convenient if you use your Macbook Air as a desktop replacement — hooked up to one or two monitors. Another plus is that you don't need to modify the Macbook to use it. The only potential problem most people will have is its price, which totals $279.

Aaron Klotz
Freelance News Writer

Aaron Klotz is a freelance writer for Tom’s Hardware US, covering news topics related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

  • Neilbob
    It doesn't have enough curvy corners, it's more than half an inch thick, it has far too much practicality, it's not shiny enough and it costs less than $500. None of these things resonate with the average Apple consumer.
    Reply
  • Notton
    That is weirdly expensive for a slab of cast aluminum and a sheet of thermal pad.

    You can get a 120x120x20mm flat aluminum heatsink for what... $10?
    A 120x120x2mm thermal pad is likely going to cost around $20.
    If that's not enough, point a $10 USB fan at it?
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    i said it in a past thread about M3.....Apple's never cared for cooling their chips.
    Form is their #1 priority and they have always had lackluster cooling that if you modded would gain more performance than stock.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    I love how people think Apple's Air design is a design fault instead of a proper design choice. Why would you buy a Pro variant if the much cheaper Air variant could perform just as well? The lack of active cooling is product segmentation.
    Reply
  • brandonjclark
    Started.. To.. Watch.. The... Video..... But... I... Just... Couldn't... Deal... With.... How... This.... Max... Guy... Talks....
    Reply
  • lenslens007
    When the original Air came out I stress tested it for 8 hours/day and when I turned it off I noticed the fan turned off immediately which would result in a thermal shock. It failed after 7 days. Also you would have to be careful not to block the cooling path with cloth - an easy thing to do when using a laptop. I presume that nowadays the cooling is well designed and throttling is properly implemented. However, messing with the thermal characteristics in previously untested ways is a risky proposition.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Even if you went with just the thermal pads, the M3 MacBook Air gains back most of its sustained performance loss.
    Presumably, the reason Apple didn't do this was to avoid burning people's laps? Also, it seems to me like a more direct-coupling between the CPU and laptop shell could make the PCB more prone to damage in a fall.

    I wonder if there's some way you could build a big vapor chamber with enough flex to avoid the "physical coupling" problem. If it were a large enough in area, that could reduce the risk to laps.
    Reply
  • M0rtis
    bit_user said:
    Presumably, the reason Apple didn't do this was to avoid burning people's laps? Also, it seems to me like a more direct-coupling between the CPU and laptop shell could make the PCB more prone to damage in a fall.

    I wonder if there's some way you could build a big vapor chamber with enough flex to avoid the "physical coupling" problem. If it were a large enough in area, that could reduce the risk to laps.
    From what I understood, the heatsink is just soaking up the heat that is getting transferred from the chip to the aluminium back panel anyway so that area is pretty hot and is just as likely to burn the users lap
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    Apple resolve the bad motherboard issues with heat. How many dead macbook because the motherboard it's corrode with humidity.
    Now without fan at 100°c don't have any issues burn the user and make the humidity not a problem anymore.
    Apple products are perfect...
    Reply
  • bit_user
    M0rtis said:
    From what I understood, the heatsink is just soaking up the heat that is getting transferred from the chip to the aluminium back panel anyway so that area is pretty hot and is just as likely to burn the users lap
    If you improve heat conduction between the SoC and the case, then the case will get hotter. They say the the SoC throttles less, so that means it's churning out more heat. That heat is going somewhere (i.e. the case).
    Reply