Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus now comes in 8-core variants

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus 8-core details
(Image credit: Qualcomm)

Qualcomm's Snapdragon X Elite and X Plus chips launched in laptops earlier this summer, showing up primarily in high-end machines with premium price tags. At IFA in Berlin, the company is introducing a lower-end version of the Snapdragon X Plus with 8 CPU cores instead of the usual 10 cores on that chip. The company suggests the change will lower prices, with laptops featuring the 8-core version starting at $799.

Crucially for Qualcomm's marketing of the chips, it maintains the same 45 NPU tops as the 10-core X Plus and the higher-end X Elite models, allowing the company to claim similar AI performance.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

  • Notton
    Classic, confuse the uninformed customer into buying the wrong thing.
    At least the part number is different, unlike RTX4070 with GDDR6.
    Reply
  • jlake3
    I really wish Qualcomm would improve their naming, but ESPECIALLY their GPU naming. Use some actual model names, or at least “N-core Adreno Graphics”.

    The architecture supposedly has 6 shader blocks and 4.5Tflops in its top configuration, and 3.8Tflops is almost exactly 5/6ths of that, implying those are 5-core GPUs at the same clock speed.

    2.1Tflops doesn’t map as smoothly, but 3-cores at same clocks would be 2.25Tflops, so that’s maybe a 3-core config with a downclock?

    1.7Tflops is even more messy, but I’m guessing that it’s 3 cores at an even lower clock, since 2 cores at flagship clocks would only be 1.5Tflops?
    Reply
  • MartinBarcelona
    the article does not mention Watts consumed, including peak and iddle, thats fair more interesting point to know than Ghz's comparisons
    Reply