Framework Laptop 13 (Intel Core Ultra) review: Familiar formula, now with Core Ultra and a 2.8K display

Framework’s CPU upgrade doesn’t offer much more performance, but the 2.8K display option is great.

Framework Laptop 13 (Intel Core Ultra)
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Framework continues to be the only game in town for true upgrades and modularity in the laptop world.

Pros

  • +

    Repairability and configurability is unmatched

  • +

    New 120 Hz, 2880 x 1920 display option

  • +

    Pre-built and DIY configurations

Cons

  • -

    2.8K display robs battery life

  • -

    Runs slightly warm and the fan is loud

  • -

    Backwards compatibility constraints limit the scope of future design changes

  • -

    Can get pricey with port and customization options

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

When it comes to the best ultrabooks, most of us have resigned ourselves to the reality that the path for future upgrades is minimal. At most, laptop manufacturers allow you to swap out the RAM, SSD, Wi-Fi card, and perhaps the battery (if you can find a replacement part). However, Framework takes a vastly different approach, allowing you to replace just about anything inside (and outside) to your heart's desire. Even the standard port allotment is configurable to your tastes, allowing you to create a laptop that suits your needs.

The latest take on that formula is the Framework Laptop 13 (Intel Core Ultra Series 1), of which we received the DIY Edition to review. In true do-it-yourself fashion, you’ll need to install the RAM, storage, and operating system. Luckily, Framework makes it a painless process and even provides you with the necessary tools to upgrade your system easily. This time around, Framework has also introduced a new display 2880 x 1920 display option with a 120 Hz refresh rate, which is a big improvement over previously available displays.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Brandon Hill
Senior Editor

Brandon Hill is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware. He has written about PC and Mac tech since the late 1990s with bylines at AnandTech, DailyTech, and Hot Hardware. When he is not consuming copious amounts of tech news, he can be found enjoying the NC mountains or the beach with his wife and two sons.

  • bit_user
    I don't care how good it is or what it costs. I'm not buying a laptop without physical buttons on the track pad. Period.

    Ideally, there'd be 3 buttons.
    Reply
  • slightnitpick
    bit_user said:
    I don't care how good it is or what it costs. I'm not buying a laptop without physical buttons on the track pad. Period.

    Ideally, there'd be 3 buttons.
    I was going to the comments section to make the same observation.

    I hope someone in the extended Framework community has though of making this option (you can swap the track pad in and out like any other feature). I'd also like more port availability on the 16" model, or through a hub "dongle" that plugs in like the current plugs but just sticks out a bit.

    Do you know of any laptop companies which currently offer buttoned track pads?
    Reply
  • Notton
    slightnitpick said:
    Do you know of any laptop companies which currently offer buttoned track pads?
    Lenovo Thinkpad, X1 Carbon, T14, T16, P15, etc.
    Asus TUF F15, A15
    Reply
  • cyrusfox
    Disappointing showing for Meteor lake here on this platform, bested in Single thread by prior gen and killed by the XPS QUALCOMM comparison.
    This is Frameworks 4th Intel iteration and its a poor showing of battery life regression here, even with a bigger screen (You can achieve higher refresh rate and lower power consumption thanks to VRR which this has). Would love to see another battery comparison on 13th vs 14th gen with the screen being identical.
    Battery regression is not new for Framework, which showed regressions also from 11th to 12th gen . Only 12th to 13th gen showed battery life improvements (6.7%). Encouraging that the big issues are being ironed out though (Continuous power consumption HDMI card). Also somehow Intel is beating ryzen on battery on framework: Forbes review
    With the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U inside, the Framework 13 ran for 6 hours and 21 minutes. But Intel’s Core Ultra 7 155H outlasted it, staying alive for 6 hours and 33 minutes of video playback.

    Congrats, Intel: you finally landed a win!
    With Qualcomm and M1-M4 on the scene destroying x86 on battery life, I truly hope Framework will embrace Lunar lake even though it is antithesis of reparability (Ram on package with CPU). Otherwise I hope Arrowlake is competitive with power.

    I am seriously considering a framework purchase but if they are not more performant, or more efficient on the same chip (See comparison to zenbook with OLED which is not a power efficient display) as well as being the more expensive option as configured ($800 more than the Asus $1300 vs $2100) makes justify such a purchase impossible. Want to support the framework eco system but that is a bit too rich and big of a chasm for my ideals.
    Reply
  • TheSecondPower
    Having used Apple's haptic touchpad at work, I don't want to go to a hinged trackpad again. Every laptop should have a haptic touchpad.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    cyrusfox said:
    Disappointing showing for Meteor lake here on this platform, bested in Single thread by prior gen
    I think this is not news, given that Intel is still selling Raptor Lake as the HX laptop SoC. Performance-wise, Meteor Lake seems like a bit of a dog. IPC didn't improve much and clockspeeds are lower than Gen 13, which pretty much leaves efficiency as the main grounds for competition.

    So, the real question I'd have is how they compare on efficiency. The battery life tests only get you part way towards answering the efficiency question. One would also need to know the size (i.e. in Watt Hours) of the respective batteries.

    cyrusfox said:
    I am seriously considering a framework purchase but if they are not more performant, or more efficient on the same chip (See comparison to zenbook with OLED which is not a power efficient display) as well as being the more expensive option as configured ($800 more than the Asus $1300 vs $2100) makes justify such a purchase impossible. Want to support the framework eco system but that is a bit too rich and big of a chasm for my ideals.
    Yeah, I keep stuff a really long time. That means I don't feel so bad about buying a non-modular laptop.

    Also, I like to build PCs and I'm very particular about all of the details. So, I don't see myself ever reusing a Framework compute module in a mini-desktop chassis, or something like that.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    TheSecondPower said:
    Having used Apple's haptic touchpad at work, I don't want to go to a hinged trackpad again. Every laptop should have a haptic touchpad.
    By "hinged", do you mean like where the entire pad is a big clickable button? I don't like those, either. When I've had those clickable trackpads, I would always just hit the discrete buttons.
    Reply
  • slightnitpick
    TheSecondPower said:
    Having used Apple's haptic touchpad at work, I don't want to go to a hinged trackpad again. Every laptop should have a haptic touchpad.
    https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/next-laptop-may-have-haptic-touchpad-and-thats-good/
    With haptic touchpads, clicks are registered equally across the whole surface.
    Aah, no. That's what I hate about clickable pads. Trying to select or drag on the pad and accidentally clicking instead.
    Reply
  • TheSecondPower
    slightnitpick said:
    https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/next-laptop-may-have-haptic-touchpad-and-thats-good/
    Aah, no. That's what I hate about clickable pads. Trying to select or drag on the pad and accidentally clicking instead.
    Apple's touchpads are pretty reliable. I can click and drag across the whole screen with a lower likelihood of a mistake than my likelihood of right-clicking while trying to left-click the buttons under the touchpad.

    In fact, I think I can click and drag more reliably on the haptic touchpad I use for work than on the touchpad with two buttons on my personal laptop. And for physical buttons that's the best-case match up.
    Reply
  • TheSecondPower
    bit_user said:
    By "hinged", do you mean like where the entire pad is a big clickable button? I don't like those, either. When I've had those clickable trackpads, I would always just hit the discrete buttons.
    Hinged trackpads are as you described. I think Apple stopped using them circa 2014 in favor of "force-touch" trackpads which I believe are generically called "haptic". These don't move, they just simulate a click when pressed with a little force. (And they simulate well; I used one for months before learning that the trackpad wasn't physically moving and clicking.) They don't require lifting a finger before clicking like tap-to-click, they just take a little force, perhaps about as much as pressing a light physical button. I usually turn off tap-to-click on any trackpad because it's too common that a tap is registered by mistake.

    It did take me a few days to get used to a haptic trackpad. Clicking feels really similar to tap-to-click so my muscle memory wanted to lift and tap, which doesn't work.

    I'm disappointed in how uncommon those are. If Apple still made hardware with Linux drivers I would probably buy a Mac but Asahi Linux is too limited.
    Reply