Google Fiber forces the competition to offer faster internet speeds — study shows up to 50% download speed increases in Mesa, Arizona

Google Fiber
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

Ookla, a connectivity intelligence firm known for its Speedtest.net service, says that Google Fiber has increased the Internet speeds in the markets it enters through competition. According to its GFiber Case Study, the median download speeds across all wired internet service providers in Mesa, Arizona, grew by 50% a year after GFiber expanded in the area in March 2023.

Many users are enticed to switch to GFiber when it enters an area because of the superior speeds that it delivers. For example, Google started offering a $250/month 20 Gbps service in late 2023, which, although expensive, is one of the fastest services you can get. Because of this, other internet providers must increase the quality and reliability of their offerings, or else they risk losing market share.

Aside from delivering good performance in a market it has just entered. Ookla also showed that GFiber remained consistent even if it has already been in the market for several years. When comparing Google’s internet service with another competitor in Salt Lake City, Utah — a market that GFiber has been serving since 2016 — the results reveal that Google offers a 38% higher download speed, 1,200% better upload speed, and a 26% shorter latency.

These results weren’t commissioned by Google but rather formed as part of Ookla’s case study to show the data and insights that customers can get from using its service. However, the data provided by Speedtest.net would also help consumers determine which internet service provider offers the best solution in their area, allowing them to make the most of their money.

Nevertheless, we expect to see internet speeds improve in the coming months—with or without the presence of GFiber. That’s because the FCC announced in 1Q24 that the benchmark for broadband speeds now sits at 100 Mbps download and 2 Mbps upload. So, internet providers must be able to deliver these speeds at a minimum if they want to offer broadband service. There’s even a report that the agency is targeting a 1 Gbps download and 500 Mbps upload speed, although no timeline has been given for that yet.

This report shows the positive impact of a reliable, high-quality internet provider on the overall internet speeds of the market, highlighting the importance of competition. Because the new entrant, GFiber, is giving its customers superior speed, many users of other providers are enticed to switch. This forces them to step up their game, thus benefiting all consumers—whether subscribed to Google or not.

TOPICS
Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • jeremyj_83
    This isn't surprising at all. Chattanooga, Tennessee was the first really well know case study for this. Back in 2008 Chattanooga was having problems with ISPs offering faster or more reliable services. In 2009 the Stimulus Package included money for broadband internet expansion. The city took the money and made their own Metro Internet service since none of the private ISPs were going to do anything. They were offering 1Gbps service to customers for $80/month back in 2011 or so. Since this is a public utility, customers only have to pay for maintenance and upgrade since profit margin isn't a thing. Now Chattanooga has one of the most reliable and cheapest internet services in the country. This created a boom for companies needing reliable internet access to move into the city which created extra jobs. This also forced the private ISPs to offer faster speeds at cheaper prices to compete. However, those private ISPs also didn't want the Metro Internet to expand further than the current metro area so they lobbied (bribed) politicians in Nashville to make it illegal for public internet to expand beyond its current area. I also believe that the law says that there can be no new public ISPs either. Right now you can get 1Gbps service there for $68/month or 2.5Gbps service for $98/month. For reference I recently got 1Gbps service from AT&T and it is $80/month for 2 years where I live.
    Reply
  • DS426
    I wonder how many folks subscribe to GFiber's 20 Gbps d/l service and then get frustrated when they can't reach those speeds on their devices, lol. Surely they give a disclaimer up front that it depends on the customer's network hardware capability?
    Reply
  • jeremyj_83
    DS426 said:
    I wonder how many folks subscribe to GFiber's 20 Gbps d/l service and then get frustrated when they can't reach those speeds on their devices, lol. Surely they give a disclaimer up front that it depends on the customer's network hardware capability?
    I wonder if that is the same cost for companies as well. If you can get that type of speed then doing backups to S3 or Blob storage is really fast and easy.
    Reply
  • Makaveli
    Once you go fiber almost impossible to back to cable. Made the switch in 2018.
    Reply
  • King_V
    Makaveli said:
    Once you go fiber almost impossible to back to cable. Made the switch in 2018.
    Depends on the cable. Where I am, I can get Verizon FiOS, and Comcast. Both offer 300Mbps. With FiOS it's symmetrical, with Comcast it's, uh, not.

    But, when Verizon upped my monthly rate and, despite being a customer for a decade, refused to budge on it (even though new customers were getting less), I switched to Comcast.

    Only AFTER the cancellation with Verizon did they send me an email saying they'd go back to my previous monthly rate. But, they lost me for a year on that.

    They've done that again recently. Actually, had $39.99/month, then in November bumped it to $43.99. Two months ago, it became $49.99. Weirdly, though, that's what they're charging new customers as well.

    Still, two hikes in a year, totaling a 25% jump, is a bit off-putting, and, depending on what Comcast is offering now, I might switch to them again for a year.
    Reply
  • TCA_ChinChin
    jeremyj_83 said:
    This isn't surprising at all. Chattanooga, Tennessee was the first really well know case study for this. Back in 2008 Chattanooga was having problems with ISPs offering faster or more reliable services. In 2009 the Stimulus Package included money for broadband internet expansion. The city took the money and made their own Metro Internet service since none of the private ISPs were going to do anything. They were offering 1Gbps service to customers for $80/month back in 2011 or so. Since this is a public utility, customers only have to pay for maintenance and upgrade since profit margin isn't a thing. Now Chattanooga has one of the most reliable and cheapest internet services in the country. This created a boom for companies needing reliable internet access to move into the city which created extra jobs. This also forced the private ISPs to offer faster speeds at cheaper prices to compete. However, those private ISPs also didn't want the Metro Internet to expand further than the current metro area so they lobbied (bribed) politicians in Nashville to make it illegal for public internet to expand beyond its current area. I also believe that the law says that there can be no new public ISPs either. Right now you can get 1Gbps service there for $68/month or 2.5Gbps service for $98/month. For reference I recently got 1Gbps service from AT&T and it is $80/month for 2 years where I live.
    They rolled out a public utilities ran 1Gbps right now in Knoxville, TN and its pretty sweet for only $65/month. Knox utilities might be crap in a lot of ways, but their public fiber is a godsend. Makes it so that other companies in the area offer cheaper rates too so even if you don't go with the public utility fiber, you can get better prices. Unfortunately rollout has been rather slow, but it seems to be making decent progress now.
    Reply
  • jeremyj_83
    King_V said:
    Depends on the cable. Where I am, I can get Verizon FiOS, and Comcast. Both offer 300Mbps. With FiOS it's symmetrical, with Comcast it's, uh, not.

    But, when Verizon upped my monthly rate and, despite being a customer for a decade, refused to budge on it (even though new customers were getting less), I switched to Comcast.

    Only AFTER the cancellation with Verizon did they send me an email saying they'd go back to my previous monthly rate. But, they lost me for a year on that.

    They've done that again recently. Actually, had $39.99/month, then in November bumped it to $43.99. Two months ago, it became $49.99. Weirdly, though, that's what they're charging new customers as well.

    Still, two hikes in a year, totaling a 25% jump, is a bit off-putting, and, depending on what Comcast is offering now, I might switch to them again for a year.
    When DOCSIS 4 becomes the standard, we might finally have symmetrical cable internet speeds.
    Reply
  • Sluggotg
    Do we really want Google to take over the internet service provider business? They own the browser market, they have the most popular Email service. They own Android. They make their own Cell Phones. They are expanding their control of the Computer/Phone/Internet.
    I hope they put pressure on the current ISP's but if they take over that part of the market, it could get very ugly. No Competition is not good.
    Reply
  • svan71
    Lol I'm on Xfinity 1200 down and a pathetic 40 up in 2024.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    Really wish I had fiber option...tired of being charged too much for crap speeds by the monopoly in my area ;/
    Reply